Jump to content

Electify Your Train Switches

  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

#76 re465


    Posts: 1
    Joined: 05-September 10
    Member: 13081

Posted 21 April 2012 - 10:49 AM

View Postdlp4341, on 03 August 2010 - 07:35 AM, said:

Posted Image
simplest solution would be to get back the 70026, 12V Remote Control Switch Motor
as 9V version ;)
I have tried too a lot all kind of solution, 90-100% of legos mades.
With/without PF, 1 micro-motor too!
Go and check out, maybe you find some ideas.

Edited by re465, 21 April 2012 - 11:09 AM.

#77 Hanso


    Posts: 113
    Joined: 06-September 11
    Member: 20274
    Country: Netherlands

Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:57 AM

Hi Folks,

I am new to this Forum, so maybe I am telling you nothing new. But I have also created an automated switch, in two flavours:

1) PF controlled

2) Mindstorms controlled (as you can see, it has also a feedback mechanism)

Attached File  Wissel Aansturing (Mindstorms).jpg   53.92K   32 downloads

Together with a small group of colleagues, I am building a fully automated train layout. We will use about five NXT controllers, and the software will be written in the programming language Microsoft C#. Two trains will run in parallel, the computer should prevent collisions.

We have been at Lego World 2012 in Zwolle (The Netherlands) with a first version of the train layout: it runs with one train only, and the switches were not functional yet. You can find an impression here: http://www.youtube.c...SiouxNETonTrack.

Edited by Hanso, 04 January 2013 - 07:11 AM.

#78 Mark Bellis

Mark Bellis

  • PaB price investigator

    Posts: 569
    Joined: 17-August 06
    Member: 910
    Country: England

Posted 05 January 2013 - 03:57 PM

The new LEGO PF Servo Motor will be out as a single-item set in March this year.
That means this simple solution will be available without buying too many 9398 Crawler sets:

Posted Image

Just a 9V supply and a 1-way switched supply is enough to drive the LEGO PF Servo Motor as it returns to the centre position when C1/C2 power is removed.
I drive the servo with a standard PF battery box and pole reverser switch (one way and centre only, the other way disabled with plates blocking the lever).
I tested it successfully with several lead added so I know it will work 2 metres from the control panel.
The PF pole reverser switches make a control panel quite easily and the extra little switch allows the user to set the polarity for pairs of facing points (which is why I petitioned for it to be added).

In the picture the mast foot clamps the point slider casing to the motor mechanism, keeping the end of the rack in the lever shoe under high torque.
The lever raises the red piece when the point is set curved.
The mechanism is designed to minimise the profile close to the track, to accommodate large train overhangs that would knock a yellow lever out of place.
This solution is designed for best reliability in places you can't see or reach over a 2-day show, such as a fiddle yard under the station (hence the stanchion).

The NXT would not provide more than C1/C2 with the standard NXT-to-PF converter lead but the PF lead could be hacked to add a 9V supply for several servo motors if necessary, or a bridge rectifier could be added to each lead if single motor sub-system autonomy was required.
I dare say an easier PF Servo Drive solution for the NXT may present itself in the future.  I can see NXTs driving PF Servos being popular for robotics.
For the moment the easiest no-mod NXT solution is to use a PF IR Receiver and for the NXT to drive it (or several of them) with an IR Link sensor (which are on January sale at LS@H).

More mechanism pics in this folder.

This is simpler than my previous solution, which used either PF, monkey or 71427/43362 gearmotors but more gears:
Posted Image

This previous solution fell foul of a sticking switch point.  It stuck just a bit more than the torque of the white clutch gear.  The clutch gear would eventually wear out, which is why I went for the servo motor solution instead - more torque, no wear-out mechanism and open-loop deterministic position - it ticks all the boxes!

Mark J E Bellis - 8mm Scale LEGO Railways, Scenery and Technic. Visit My Brickshelf.  My LEGO Technic BB-8 Droid
Posted ImagePosted Image  Posted Image

#79 vladich


    Posts: 2
    Joined: 29-December 14
    Member: 132303

Posted 29 December 2014 - 08:02 PM

Just built a very simple EV3-based solution with my kids: https://www.youtube....h?v=9sfbBJVvj9o

Posted Image

It uses one big EV3 motor (I think you can use a medium size motor as well, although I didn't try it) and a simple cranckshaft mechanism.

#80 toxicbananna


    Posts: 49
    Joined: 22-January 12
    Member: 24747
    Country: Singapore

Posted 03 March 2015 - 05:02 PM

hey guys.. been reading up these post and was wondering if modififying the switch track to create lesser friction, will it damage the track?

I look at my switches and it looks like if you pull the base out, it will not seems to stick back. any ideas?

#81 Lazarus


    Posts: 593
    Joined: 22-May 12
    Member: 28748
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 03 March 2015 - 07:43 PM

No it wont damage the track, but you may need to glue the base plate you pull off back on.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users