Piratedave84

As I have said before; if a claim is made, it must be tested!!!! Vote: Tammy (Tammo) Sorry for my lack of participation today; super swamped!

I was really busy today and will also be tomorrow; sorry for the lack of participation. In due time it shall be revealed that my conttibutions speak volume as to my non-scumminess!! I understand how my actions here may have been perceived as scummy but I can assure you that I am not scum. More on that later!

Coffee came out of my nose!

As soom as a scenario/play is made, Sara is always the first to ask "Who's who, give us names! we must lynch person X" In my Yoda scenario yesterday she was very keen on identifying Yoda (who was subsequently cleared)

This is all really messed up; I trust Oscar more than Shadell an believe Shadell to be full of ... Manure!! I choose to: vote: Shadell (Shadows)

There is also a valid theory that Yoda was merely using his lunch on Oscar and if that is the case, then his coming out and claiming publicly to be Yoda would sort of vindicate him for the time being. This would however not explain the Matilda-exclusive conversation. I'll give Yoda a few hours

I don't wnat to take away from the Shadell/Cult-leader/Psych craziness and I think we should proceed with a lynch of Shadell BUUUUUUUUT I have another element to bring forward. I used my lunch on Oscar last night and saw that someone else had targetted him, for the time being we shall call this person "Yoda" (because we loooove code names ) I turns out that Yoda was out and about targetting Oscar, I asked Yoda in private why he had targetted Oscar and it was quite a while before I got an answer (most likely seeking advice from his scum buddies); the answer was, at the time, satisfactory. Then I found out that Yoda had in fact been in communication with Matilda, only Matilda since this ordeal began, and when asked about it, no answer was provided. We know we had a scum result on Matilda from an investigation, based on this I can only assume that Yoda targetted Oscar for assassination. Since these events, we have found out that Oscar was in fact bulletproof and so this to me explains the lack of kill last night. Yoda, do you care to explain why you: 1) Targetted Oscar? (you told me in private, so if you got nothing to hide, say it here) 2) Failed to explain to both myself and another person why you were in contact with Matilda, only scummy Matilda. Your play!

Given the circumstances, taking an unconditional stand for someone is very odd. Most of us tend to agree with one party over another but what has been said leads me to beilieve that most individuals are actually reluctant to take side and will just vote agains the person they "believe the less".

Who said word processor? I said and meant "other window" as in other firefox window, using the actual reply function of the forum. I am overreacting? I thought I was not, maybe I am in your eyes; i feel that i should defend myself when grilled, a normal reaction in my opinion! The way I understand this is that the hunter would turn up as town if killed; so this means that the person may be dead already. Maybe Shadell got to her before us and therefore has free reign ...

please elaborate; In private I asked you about your beef with Daisy which you told me ( and here in thread) was because he was a dick, you also said you would like to see what your result on Daisy meant and that lynching her would be a good way to find out. I also asked what your thoughts were on Oscar; you said I could maybe ue my Banana on him as you, him and Shadell were likely targets for a night kill on night 2. (I used it on Oscar) We also discussed his take on Oscar being town, which you seem to think is legit and on someone looking for their borther and what it could mean. I fail to see where I went scummy here. In public I already explained why I was so rash yesterday; as for today, I fail to see what makes me scummy to your eyes seeing I explained everything I did/said.

1) I said I did not read back before posting, that I am guilty of; I did not know it was there in the first place. 2) I did not know that, I thought it was to emphasize, I only used boards once in another dream. My apologies if I am not a writeboard guru! This: I find it funny and quite disconcerting that both yesterday and today I am being chopped to pieces for benign things when we clearly have bigger fishes to fry! I understand why Katie would want to divert attention from her after being under scrutiny for some time, but Cece I don't get. As I have just pointed out!

Not waiting, if you need to know; I had written a post yesterday in window "A" then I updated window "B", Matilda was already dead. My post was therefore invalid and I deleted it or at least I thought. This morning, I sat at my computer and refresh Window "A" to write my post and the sentence was still there. I am totally guilty of using 2 windows at the same time and of not having re-read what I wrote. Are you for real? This is not rocket science: 1) I cannot edit posts; God sais so, its in the rules, look it up 2) I fear using asterisks; earlier today Oscar aluded to the fact that using asterisks to quote a word is commonly used in writeboards which are themselves often used by scum, hence asterisks are bad. Aye!

I know .... I read back after hitting "post" and realized that! (it was left over from a post I intended to make last night) I can't edit my posts and now fear using asterisks ... apologies

All caught up! Now this first: Overreaction, yes, softly pointed, not in my opinion! Let me give you some background info; Oscar and I had been talking for a while and I had volunteered information I found which I thought may be of interest, the conversation went on; then I went in thread only to find out that he had called me out in thread for something we were trying to figure out behonf the scene, it REALLY rubbed me the wrong way, I felt betrayed. I think this is now behind us (Oscar and I at least) and I hope you can also forgive my outburst as this is not my usual self. On to the topic at hand, why not lynch Shadell? We have a scum result, the way I see it we have to lynch him; in my opinion there are enough curve-balls in this game these events that God could not have possibly have inserted a cult as well. Bare in mind, this is my take on it; the possibility still exists that there is in fact a cult but I am willing to gamble and lynch Shadell today. Lynch the confirmed scum.

Welllllllll what do you know!!! Matilda is dead! We still have a few hours to figure how we are going to deal with the cult and whom our lynch target will be; these developments have really taken a toll on my understanding of the events that have transpired today. I need to do some serious re-reading and note taking!

Addendum; is that better! Note to self: asterisks are bad!

* I targeted So, if there is a cult, is it essential for us to keep Shadell alive or can we get rid of this cult by ourselves?

Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy today; Targeted you with my banana :s and saw Ginny looking at you!

Wah! This is so ..... Scummy! I don't think any town member in their right mind would in fact keep a scum result from us; it makes no sense! Oh scooter what have you done!

And torches!!! Lynch mob, yay!!!

Maybe this does not make sense, maybe you forgot the the "lunch business" was debunked early enough yesterday by daisy, maybe you will notice that the analysis was confrimed as accurate, maybe you will see that there are no "one-time blocking action" Here is Daisy's analysis of the lunch situation: Maybe you are scum! Have a nice day!

Ahem! I NEVER ASKED FOR THE NAME! Where are you all getting this! Lord almighty! Does anyone not feel that finding out who or at least narrowing down who the killer is help us in any way shape or form? Who is to say that this killer is helping town? Her 2 kills of townies are probably pure luck, my impression is that her kills were targeted towards unhelpful silent players. Believe what you will; I am not scum, I am merely here to help and I thought my voicing my observations would do just that. Oscar has stopped talking to me after I tried to sort things out. For me that says a lot! Who is to say Fozzie Bear is town? Who is to say Oscar is town? Who is to say that what Oscar is claiming is in fact not a machination to confuse us!? I will not be back here until later, in the meantime please consider everything that has been said. Do you really think Oscar let that "her" slip intentionally? Please! Then when I called him on it he went apeshit on me!

It seems defensive yes; when called out by an analytical player such as Oscar who has probably scrutinized every post I made since confirming, I feel it is essential to be defensive and agressive. Nothing; I was seeking advice from an experienced player who told me to "pay more attention"; when I did I get called out and grilled! Oh well! Investigate me, tonight! You'll see!

Oscar, your calling me out and grilling me I find to be misguided. I never asked to know who the killer was, I was trying to see if I was on the right track with my theory of "the killer is a female" which I find is now apparent is right based on your over reaction to a very simple PM. As far as not voting for Walter; I get the whole wanting to extend the day principle but I feel that if we start to split the vote to much, as is starting to happen, then we will get nowhere! What if the day killer is scum?

Here is what I said in paraphrase-ish mose since I can't quote my PM: I said it made me believe that Oscar knew that the Vig or SK was a female character. I then asked if i was reading too much into it or if it was a genuine error. I concluded by saying it was suprising to me that he would let that slip.