Piratedave84

I've now seen Michael drop in a few times ... and leave, this only adds to the suspicious-ness of his post. I have been advocating for it and will put my money where my mouth is: Vote: Michael (badboytje88) Let's face it, based on previous behaviour, it is FAR more likely that Michael is scum based on his behaviour since day one than Bristol. I can only imagine the face-palming going on behind the scenes if Micheal posted that as a "rogue"!!! If this was a team effort/strategy .... speechless

Barbara will call you crazy and gice you shit for saying that!!! I agree with you that we can also test the claim by lynching Michael who let's face it it lying. I will be proactive here and answer this question ahead of time: "why would scum accuse an innocent knowing they will be lynched tomorrow!" It could very well be that there is in fact a scum watcher or a scum investigator that found out Bristol had a role/action; sacrificing a goon to take out a PR is an acecptable sacrifice/gamble IMO!

I said this to you in private earlier today, but I will repeat it here: How about saving a towny from death and lynching a scum? Not that this would serve you any good, but in my book if Bristol is town and it can be asserted that Michael is scum ... then lynching the accuser makes more sense ... no? He won;t answer .... I asked virtually the same questions earlier and no answer as of yet. Very scummy; drop a bomb and leave!

I started my post as the PM was being sent to me ... could not have read it before hand! I addressed your recent concerns via PM.

Michael tells us that the faction he is part of can convert; can you? What is transpiring here is that there are possibly 2 neutral factions (both thieving factions), a scum faction, an SK and a town faction? HIGHLY unlikely! Michael does not want to tell us who is his accomplice (which has the diamond BTW) but did tell us it was not you and you are not willing to tell us who the other thief is. We can deduce that there are at least 4 thieves and that it is possible their ranks will grow. Michael, can you and your friend elaborate on the win condition of your party? Does it corroborate any information provided by Barbara? Actually just tell us if it's similar or not, it should be sufficient for now.

But why? Why would you organise for town? What's in it for you? Listen if the majority of "town" supports you, so be it and I shall abdicate; you seem very confident of ever being lynched, people like to sheep ... I don't ... If people wnat to side with you that's fine by me but in the long run you have your win condition which does not include us and we have our win condition that does not include you; we will need to part ways so let's not get too attached!!!! Michael tells us you are not part of his faction which seems can do conversions so this tells me you are lying and are not neutral in any way shape or form.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! How interesting!!!! Should this prove to be true and not a aploy by scum to target an innocent, we must lynch Bristol as it is almost impossible for the jewel to have changed hands! Your statement however raises eyebrows; you said that you and a buddy came together which means you knew each other from the get-go which in turns makes Barbara's search for other thieves kind of superfluous ... and a lie! This could also mean that by an INSANE amount of luck, you met up with the other thief by chance which means that there are 3 thieves: Barbara, person X and yourself. Would you care to address these concerns?

Which is it? Jewel thief or Master Criminal? You saying "kill me and you wont have any information" makes you look as self-centered and narcissistic as Jonathan ... what? are you the neutral town pillar now? Who is to say you are helping us anyways ... I feel you are trying to use your "vast experience" to confuse everybody ... I still don't feel easy about you or your "friends" Oh, sorry I had forgotten that the 2 previous days were taken out of the space time continuum and that we should not take them into account today! My apologies!!! WTF really? It seems you are willing to contribute today and have at least posted semi-valid points ... and then this ... what a non-towny thing to say! maybe after 2 days of near lynch wwe will take you up on that! We shoud take this list, and anything Barbara says, with a grain of salt .... a BIG grain of salt. The "results" from them (the 2 MC or thieves) merely means that the person targetted did not have the jewel on them which in turns means that there is a very real possibility that some of the "cleared" list are still scum or neutral. Now can aynone confirm with certitude that we still have a town investigator? this would enable us to certify that some individuals on the list are in fact clear. Alternatively we could simply lynch one of the "semi-cleared" persons to test the theory! I am still enclined to lynch Barbara, neutral or scum there is no way keeping her alive will help us in the long run. Alternatively, I am not opposed to lynching Holly as her posting/voting habit have made her stand out from the crowd.

True true, this was written in haste; I retract my statement! Although 2 other have said the same thing .... Just sayin'

Quite useful today are we? Do not think your 2 near-lynches will be forgotten; might I remind you that several people have voiced concerns over your behavioir which you have yet to answer to/correct!

This!

Knowing his style of play ... It would not suprise me that he used that tactic. It is also possible that he was some sort of flavor-cop or a watcher ! there's nothing wrong with sharpening our forks and dipping our torches in gasoline .... you know just to be ready! Good eye!! I had not caught that!!!!!

... I'm going to pretend you did not just say that and simply point ... over .... here

Lossing our cop/day investigator sure sets us back as far as finding scum but our conviction of a scum and the murder of a second one makes me SUPER happy and hopeful for the future. My theory is that Matthew was the SK when Mr.Necksnap is our vig ... but then again who is to say who's who!!!!! I made a promise to Jonathan that should he die I would post a PM he sent me; it is NOT (unfortunately) investigation results and goes as follows: DISCLAIMER: DO NOT SHOOT THE MESSENGER What do you make of this?

But PIerre was not a "dead man" at the time of the original post and at that time your vote did matter; besides what makes Michael so suspicious to you? Who is to say that there are other neutral thieves? the fact the the self-proclaimed thief said so himself .... hardly convincing argument IMO! Also the fact that Pierre is scum or not depends much more, if not entirely, on wether or not Jonathan lied .... not Barbara ... well maybe Narbara as a part in it but not merely as much as Jonathan ... Also ... 500th post!!!!!

Hello town? is everyone asleep? As it currently stands we will not accomplish a lynch today .. which would be a bad thing ... If my calculation are right, we need one more vote before the day ends to lynch PIerre ... anyone ... anyone?

The way I intended for the message to be was more in the lines of you both should be voting for the person you feel is scum rather than "with the group". That having been said, I understand why you are voting as you are and I respect it; it is true that the "fluff" is distracting from the main issue. Yeah it's possible that it does but I still cannot believe that people are willing to vote for Mary when we have a much more suitable lynch candidate in the form of either Barbara, Pierre or even the unknown "tracker". IMO if mary was really scum, she would be trying aling with her team to save her megablocks more ardently than she is; watch this, should she be lynched she will flip town. Mary's attitude towards her lynch make me believe she is Vanilla. All that being said, I will again change my vote to Pierre, I think Stacy made a very good point and I am willing to change my vote back if it means we can get answers. Pierre's lynch would enable us to sort out whom between Jonathan and Barbara is telling the truth and to then scrutinize the "liar" tomorrow. Unvote: Alice (RumbleStrike) Vote: PIerre (CallMePie)

Your vote does count and it may j Sorry about that!!! Why vote for michael if you don't think he should be lynched!? How does that make sense? "Hey! Look at me voting for this guy who I'm suspicious of but we should not lynch!! Let's sceutinize him but not vote for him!" WTF! Votin is not mandatory and if you are just gonna vote "but not to get a lynch" then withhold your vote! ^ that by the way was a double post ... And this is a triple post!!! As said above... WHYYYYYY! Why not vote for who you think is scum rather than stick with the group!

This puzzles me: Jonathan you make a strong case against Pierre and said like 47 times you thought he was scummy; why not vote for him??? Re-reading the rules and the last statement by Bob, it is not too late to change votes and vote for the person you feel is scum.

Thomas did say that either Barbara or Pierre had to have killed Scott but yet he has voted for Mary. Why? We still have a few hours to discuss the lynch and our suspicions so let's do that!! I dont get why so many people have voiced suspicions over ither players and yet have voted for Mary ... Are we still on the whole "I forgot my number" deal because frankly in the face of the Jonathan-Barbara-Pierre-mystery tracker business, forgetting your number or acting lost is not really a big deal ...

What I meant here was: Vote: Alice (Rumblestrike) It is true that we lost sight of this; was it not said though that 3 people targetted Scott, Barbara, Pierre and ? Based on what you are saying though we should be lynching either Barbara or Pierre, right? then whu not vote for one of them?

Frankly I skimmed your reply at first reading something like "bla bla bla lies lies lies" but then after I posted I actually read the story ... It's believeable and I am enclined to return to my original vote Unvote: Pierre (CallMePie) Vote: Alice (Rumblesteike)

Hum... This is an interesting turn ... Good grief, I have flashbacks from a dream called "EB mafia" where Jonathan was like "vote for such.... Wait no... Here's a development vote for person B .... NOOOO, dont vote for either" arghh You do bring up some good points though but your quotes seem a bit overly "sanitized IMO" Also why not vote for Jonathan then? Your font size was considerably bigger than the default EB size!

A couple of hours to consult his scum budddies!!!

Triple post Stoopid phone!!! Unvote: Alice (Rumble Strike) Vote: Pierre (CallMePie)