Captain Genaro

I have not tried to look helpful. I have tried to be helpful, and by your standards failed. Yesterday you asked me to come out and tell the world who I suspected and I did so. You have called on me to be more helpful and I am doing the best I can with the limited experience that I have. I'm not asking for your sympathy, I'm simply trying to explain why I am not as helpful as some of the other members. I will point out that I have not been lazy; I have followed along and posted every day. I have been completely honest and have not told a single lie. If you can find any inconsistencies in what I have said, please bring them to our attention. I have no information from private conversations and I lack a night action. All I have to go off is what people say during the day. I'm somewhat new to this business so I am not very good at finding scum based off the day threads (unless it is something obvious). If you'll note, I was suspicious of Daisy from Day 1 and voted for her on that day. I have consistently voted for the scum and never tried to defend any of them. If I am scum, then I'm doing a pretty poor job of helping my team. On Day 2, we needed 12 votes to lynch Walter. I was the 11th vote for him. There were only 12 votes for him so had I voted elsewhere, he would not have been lynched and the scum would not have suffered their first loss. I also used my lunch, which was a donut, on Oscar. Out of my own free will, I contacted him to let him know that I used my lunch on him. I have not tried to hide anything from anyone Sorry if this is unorganized but I don't have the time right now to organize it and I want to get my two cents in before anyone else votes for me without getting to hear my defense.

Two people I have suspected have convinced me (at least for the time being) that they are not scum. Katie is now the only one of my original suspects who I am not convinced of their towniness. Katie seems to be one of, if not, the last person to be fully convinced of Oscar's loyalty. I know that this is not enough to lynch someone, but she has also promised to show us an analysis. On Day 4, she said that she had written up her opinions and thoughts and would post them at a later time. She never did. Instead, she voted for Tammy and jumped on the Wild Dragon bandwagon. Vote: Katie (PsyKater) I understand that you are busy, I'm busy too, but you cannot promise to tell us what your thoughts are, claim to have a nice speech prepared, and then get cold feet. Will God accept this format or does He require parenthesis instead of a dash?

Is that your answer to my question? Could you please be a little more clear as to why you are not targeting him for his uselessness? Unless something else comes up or someone convinces me otherwise, I think that my vote will go towards Wild Dragon. As far as I can tell, he has contributed nothing, consistantly placed his vote after a majority had been reached, and has not pointed a single hoof at anyone.

Why isn't Wild Dragon on this list?

I'm not trying to be defensive, I just thought that someone might ask me about it later if I didn't say anything then. I'm also sorry to offend Bunsen but I did want to hear from the accused to see if that would clear things up. Besides, I prefer Beaker (I know, I'm just rubbing salt in the wound). I'm also sorry about misreading what Tammy was saying about the mortician being a day action. Did she say that it was a one-time action? Simple. It could be inferred that Shadell contacted you and warned you not to use your governor action. She knew she was going down and didn't want to take you down with her. Or you could have been bluffing about the whole governor action and you were forced to make up an excuse not to use it when it became clear that Shadell would be lynched. May I ask what convinced you that Shadell was scum? Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to claim that you are scum or that I would like to see you lynched at this point. I'm simply trying to put pieces of the puzzle together.

Are you telling us that you did not get your night action result until the middle of the day? While I never suspected you until now, you seem to be digging yourself into quite the hole with too many inconsistencies and lies for me to believe you Vote: Tammy (Tamamono) I would have voted for you sooner but I wanted to see your response as to why you did not tell us about your night action results.

Tammy, why did you wait until now to tell us this story? Why didn't you tell us earlier today about your mortician role and your results? If you knew since last night that Shadell was janitored (I don't even think that's a word ) you should have told us first thing what her true affiliation was.

Are you implying that we should lynch people who are not suspects or are you just trying to get me to contribute more? If you want to know, I have not contributed as much as some of you would have liked because I have had nothing to add. I was suspicious of Daisy from Day 1 and I voted for her instead of Trisha. By the time I showed up on later days, it seemed that there were other issues which had taken presidents over my issue with Daisy. I probably should have stated that I did not like Daisy on these other days and that is my mistake. Now that Daisy is gone, I suspect Katie, Wild Dragon, and Dansmith. While I don't know her playing style, Katie has not been helpful and has focused her suspicion and accusations towards Oscar. Apart from Day 1 when he didn't vote at all, Wild Dragon has been the last or second to last voter who simply followed the crowd. In my opinion, he has contributed even less than I have. I don't like the way that Dansmith was unconditionally defending Shadell the other day and threatened to his governor action (if he even has one) to prevent the lynch. He only backed down when it appeared that Shadell was doomed. Beyond what I have already stated, I don't have any evidence to incrimidate any of the people who I suspect.

I can think of two reasons why Shadell was missing. 1) The scum want us to remain in the dark 2) Oscar really was framing Shadell and needed Shadell's alignment to be kept dark to prevent his lynch today. Considering how helpful Oscar has been in finding two scum and leading the lynch against them, I am leaning towards the first reason. Daisy, getting in fights with Fred really does not help your claim, especially since you seem to be focusing on insulting him instead of disproving him. Also, if you are a vanilla townie, as you claim, why were the glasses in your room? You're disputing Oscar's claim about the moustache but I haven't heard you dispute the glasses. To add on to this, your posts on day one before the lie detector was found to be fraudulent were rather odd.

Opps, sorry about that. When I was quoting Dave, I must have deleted his quote marks and replaced it with yours since he quoted you in his statement. I'm really sorry about that. Just an FYI for all of you, I was attempting to quote Dave, not Mike.

I believe that I am the person that you are referring to as "Yoda." To answer your questions. 1) First, I needed to use my lunch before something happened to it or me. Second, I needed to know if Oscar is trustworthy. I know that he led the crusade against Walter but it could simply be an attempt to prove his loyalty by sacrificing a member of the scum (meat shield). That's exactly what I told you in our private conversation. 2) Where the heck did you get the idea that I was talking with Matilda? Whoever told you that is full of garbage and I for one would like to know a name. Also, please correct me if I'm wrong but I do not believe that you asked me about any contact with Matilda. 3) If you take a moment to look at my history, you will see that I typically go about my work in the morning and don't have a chance to join the conversatation until later, after spending an hour or so catching up. I believe that you sent me your message in the morning and I did not reply until later, which is normal for me. Moving on to Shadell's lynch. I have found this entire situation to be extremely confusing but at the same time, I think that I have figured out enough to make an informed vote for Shadell. Shadell's version of the cult leader seems too much overly powered. I doubt that God would put us in a position where we only had one chance of stopping the cult (which would be Shadell) while the cult leader could run around and convert people without any fear of being blocked, killed, or investigated (save by Shadell). I know that some people are advocating for us to put off Shadell's lynch until tomorrow and have an investigator check her out tonight. Not only does this seem like a chance for someone to trap and kill our investgator, but I'm also sure that Shadell could come up with some explanation if she had an unfavorable report come tomorrow. This is why I Vote: Shadell (Shadows).

I do think that someone else would have called you out if you are lying but I also think that someone else might want to confirm what you said if it is the truth. Out of the ten people you mention, you are the only one to make these claims in public. Maybe the group is fine with you being the sole spokesperson. I hope that you can understand why I'm being cautious. I have answered all of your questions that you have asked me in private and I shall continue to do so. If there is a question that has not been answered to your satisfaction, just let me know in our conversation.

As far as I know, I have not been targeted by anyone. Based off what I'm hearing, it seems like Janice has dug herself into a hole and is desperately trying to find a way out. If she really did target me, she never told me. Then she goes on to say that she stole Bunsen's lunch when someone else? No disrespect Oscar but is there any way that we could hear some of this from another party the investigator trusts?While I would like to believe you, it does seem like a great way for the scum to cause some major confusion with the town. We could lose both Janice and Scooter and you could blame it on the investigator. Don't get me wrong, as I already stated, I would like to believe you but an uncorroborated story of this magnitude makes me weary, especially considering that you could easily pass the buck along to the day investigator.

Opps . Sorry Oscar, I thought that Lady Dolores was an alias for other people here. Am I correct to assume that your Muppets are aliases for other players? Also, thank you for your chart. I agree that it can and will be useful but I would'nt rule people to be townie based solely off their position on that chart. It is possible that some smarter scum thought that they could claim town early and not get caught because the investigator would focus on people with weird claims or who claimed late. The day is coming to an end and I need to vote. While I still have my doubts about Daisy for the reasons I stated yesterday, I find the case against Walter to be very compelling and in a worst case scenario, we would lose a vanilla townie. Not that I'm advocating for this, but I do believe that we will gain more than we will lose by lynching Oscar. Vote: Walter (Waterbrick Down). Now off to study Hamlet and Calculus (not at the same time). Yippy . Don't worry, I'll be back before the day is over.

I must have missed your previous question, sorry. Sometimes it can be hard to hear a hedgehog over all the ruckus that a farm makes . To answer it, I assumed that no one would be protected since it was the middle of the first day. No one would have had a night to prepare to protect anyone. This is assuming that protectors cannot act during the day. You said in that "Lady Dolores" sent you a note telling you that she saw Walter being blocked. I assumed this meant that "Lady Dolores" was watching Walter.

I honestly don't know how to feel about Oscar's statements regarding Walter's alignment. I would like to believe that Oscar and his source were correct but at the same time I think that it would be too much of a coincidence for Walter to have been blocked AND for someone to have chosen to watch him with their lunch. Oscar, are you sure that Walter was being blocked and not protected?

Assuming that there are two killers, ( a SK and a scum killer), I would assume that it was the SK that killed Zara. Killing Zara seems like a wasted kill for the scum considering how quiet she was, especially when they had so many more valuable, unprotected targets. Unless, of course the scum knew something about Zara which we don't (but I doubt that). I believe that, as unlikely as it may seem, the scum were blocked or their target was protected. As it has previously been stated, it is too early for a conversion to make sense (unless they have multiple conversions and a low number of starting members). Besides, just because it's statistically unlikely does not mean that it was impossible for the blocker/protector be successful on night one.

Good gosh, another one dead already? I believe that this was an act of God. Even if someone has a kill lunch, it seems like a strange time to use it. Too early for the scum to know anything about important roles worth targeting and too soon for the town to know if Zara was scum.

Come on, now you're just rubbing salt in the wound. Why did you have to bring back memories of me feeding poor little Hector sugar cubes? On another note, all is forgiven.

I didn't vote for her. I voted for Daisy.

Let me see if I understand thist. You pick a target but you have no idea what will happen? So you would just have to hope that it does what you want? This does not sound legitimate action. Unless some of our more experienced friends here tell me otherwise, I'm calling your bluff. At first, I thought that you were an inexperienced townie. Now I know that you're either a crazy townie who will hinder us or you're scum.

Just to start things off, I am aligned with the town. I am not scum. I honestly don't think that Trisha is guilty of anything other than making a mistake. I think her comment was a pathetic excuse for a joke based off the apples she gave to the animals. Why she said it, I don't know. I hardly think that this type of a thing is worth lynching someone over. Please correct me if I'm wrong or if I'm missing something. On the other hand, I think that there is a strong case against Daisy. She seemed to make a joke out of claiming and only claimed when pressured. If she is an honest townie, she has no reason to fear the lie detector. If she is a SK or scum, then she does. For this reason, I VOTE: Daisy (Scubacarrot). I'm in a bit of a rush so if I don't reply to any responses right away, please forgive me.

Who is the heartless monster amongst us who could commit these atrosities? Well, is anyone going to speak up? No? Fine, just delay the inevitable because we will find you sick horse killing monsters!

NO! Poor Hector, such a sweet horse. What monster could do such a thing? More importantly, how am I, Ginny, going to become a world famous jockey without a horse?

1) Ragnarök Now, Red Scare Mystery, Eurodina, and Imperial Soldiers Mafia. 2) Yes. 3) Come on, what could be more important than mafia? Of course I will be available. 4) Cake! Let them me eat cake!