-
Posts
35,896 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Hinckley
-
Don't get all depressed about it. This isn't really a case of personality. We have to get rid of these roles when we find them. And you're right, you would switch over, so you really are working for the Town by exposing yourself. ... um ... Thank you?
-
No! Oh God, please no. And what are you to do if the Town start losing numbers? Switch over to the Scum team? How are we supposed to believe you wouldn't betray us? Blind Faith? Not a neutral in a def-is-God game. No way from me. Sorry, my vote stands.
-
Remembering God's words about there being only one neutral serial killer aside, let's think about God's previous play (God likes to write plays) and how the neutrals worked. God said there would be only one neutral serial killer. Is it possible there are other neutrals running around that can't kill? Let's consider this from God's last play. The neutrals were meant to spread confusion. They were thieves and redirectors and dream whisperers. They could choose to work with the Scum or Town. They said after the play that they had no way of knowing who the Scum were to work with them. If Pie is a neutral who can work with either side, now the Scum know where to find him and team up with him and use whatever confusing Night Action he may have. Then, there's also the possibility of God meaning there would only be one neutral and he would be the serial killer and here he is. The Beast has a tendency not to read things, so I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't notice this had been proclaimed by God and claiming neutral would give him away...
-
That's a big assumption to make. It'd be easy to claim that one-shot, as powerful as it is, when backed up against the wall. If this is an inventor replacement, perhaps there's more than one of each of the useful actions? Lessen the chance that the Scum could keep them from the Town? Maybe... All I know for sure is I don't like being this confused on Day One... Clever. I imagine it may be hard to get two minds to come to one vote. Especially when they're as close as the same household brain.
-
That would make it too easy, but you're right. There has to be a reason we can't take the same one day after day...
-
Wow, this is all happening really fast. Best line in one of these plays, ever. Hmmm...watcher is a very powerful role. The meds gave you that?? Impressive. Oh geez, that doesn't make me want to vote you now. Didn't God say he would only have one neutral killer in this game? I have a new theory: Perhaps the meds are a replacement for the inventor role. We've seen some difficulty with that role in the past. Perhaps God is trying to fix the balance-setting nature of that role by handing out one-shot actions through the meds. That would be why there are so many goofy ones that may not effect the game hardly at all. So maybe there are four or five useful actions in that list of 26, but the rest are just filler and fluff. I think that's the most likely explanation at this point. If that's the case, the random balance could be set by randomly placing meds. That way the scum can't find and block the good ones from us. I really think this would be an addition to other night actions. It would be a pretty scary game if Pie's theory is correct. Considering the three pages that just blew up out of nowhere, I'm happy with where my vote is...
-
Also, God did say he was going to make it impossible for someone to keep using the same action against the same person and we're not allowed to take the same medication two days in a row. I guess that would be supporting this meds theory. Oh wait, but it also says we can't target the same person two nights in a row... Ugh... Already? I have a familiar feeling of frustration creeping in.
-
Whoa whoa whoa. Ok, let's all settle down for a second. Considering all of this and that some meds may actually be useful. Nobody should be revealing what their meds do. If they do the same thing every day, will the scum take them? What the hell? OK, let's think this out. If the town is all vanilla and the meds are the night actions... ...(that would be aggravatingly stupid) how would we stop the scum from getting our actions? If there's a vigilante action, could they take it and get two night kills? What if they find the "investigator" med and they keep getting it and keep it from us? I think that idea is impossible. It'd be like a big dumb game of Russian Roulette! Everyone took medication. Maybe it does one thing if you're scum and another if you're Town? Oh, why did I sign up for this game end up in this stupid asylum? Why? I'm hoping these meds are just enhancements of other actions. I can't see how it could possibly be the only night actions. Although, it is good to see you working. Shit, do I have to un-vote you now? You could be Scum trying to confuse us with a crazy theory or you could actually be on to something. You could also be a Townie genuinely coming up with a crazy theory, as well. I really hope it's a crazy theory, either way. If it's "meds are night actions"...ugh. Yes, I do love that face. I hope we all have it, even thinking that this is possible...Stupid Fraulein Crazy-Twat.
-
Never mind, never mind. Duh. I get it. The medicine is gone if the player taking it dies. I get it. I get it. Sorry. Didn't comprehend what you were saying, at first, but at least I read it. So, there's more useful medicine out there?
-
Can you explain this? Sorry, I'm not following...
-
OK. I don't know if we're allowed to do this, but I don't see a rule that states we can't. Let me take a look at the rules and I'll come back to it. Trust me, it's just stupid. Hey! Those are the faces I make! Hey, no hard feelings. Again, I'm not saying this is an endorsement of her. I just think you would be a liability to the town, since you have demonstrated either a lack of reading skills or comprehension in the past and already in this lifetime. Sorry.
-
For me, it's more about preferring to see you go. I have no problem casting a vote for you. It is, in no way, an endorsement of Bell's innocence. Vote: Carl "The Beast" Pie (CallMePieOrDie) My main reason is that you have already shown us that, as usual, you do not feel like reading or paying attention to what is going on. That is such a liability, leaving you looking like an oblivious Townie, when you are actually scum or making you a Townie who is easily manipulated by the scum. I think you've already proven that, either way, we'll do fine without you. Couple that with your strange idea of not voting and it's just too much on Day One. We have plenty of time to unvote if anything else is revealed, but as we all see in every game ... of life, we're not likely to be handed any evidence, especially on Day One. Otherwise, we have Bell with 6 votes. In the past, she has proven she works hard and pays attention. If she is Town, she is an asset. She hasn't exhibited any suspicious behavior like Pie has. That is how I'm making my decision today.
-
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum II: Fraulein Bloodbrick
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
The ones I remember, from the 80's, always ended with them not being able to market the idea. For example, two civil war soldiers would accidentally mix their chocolate and peanut butter, totally kinky. Then the war would end and they would be distracted. Two great tastes would have to wait... -
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum II: Fraulein Bloodbrick
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Hey you got your dried bull testicle in my powdered rhino horn! Anyone here the right age to remember those commercials? -
Does anyone have the Trigonometry skills to figure this out? The penalty vote against Belle is 8 votes?? Wait, what's 26 divided by 4? 6. Belle has 6 votes.
-
When and what will the next themed month be?
Hinckley replied to Joey Lock's topic in Forum Information and Help
I have to agree that it's somewhat inevitable judging by the popularity and the push LEGO is giving the product line... -
Exciting new MOCs in the Town Forum! Eurobricks member Jalkow has his own furniture collection! Jalkow has built some excellent furniture but the truly cool experience is his excellent and unique presentation. Check it out here. And Blake Baer shares his entry for MOCOlympics, a static scene from a dynamic tragedy, Hurricane Irene: There's a lot of great detail including the movement of the waves and the trees. Blake has used great building skill to help you feel that powerful wind. Check it out here.
-
Are you not reading again? :hmpf: :hmpf: :hmpf: :hmpf: :hmpf: It is written in the rules that we are required to vote! Shithole.
-
Dr. Bloodbrick's Asylum II: Fraulein Bloodbrick
Hinckley replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
You mean like the first post? -
Mine says I hypnotised people into killing themselves. If there's a rash of suicides, vote me out. Until then, I'm pretty sure there's nothing in our profiles that would indicate our affiliation.
-
What? I'm not saying you're likely to be scum. I'm just saying you're obnoxious. If we have to vote for someone, why not the one calling us shitholes non-stop? It's possible your over-zealous roleplaying is your tactic for being scum and not slipping up. Maybe you think if you stick to your character you won't accidentally slip or something. It's possible, anyway. But, I'm mostly just calling you out for being annoying. I admit we have nothing concrete. The spaceman theory is something to go on, but I don't feel we should.
-
Since when do we ever find clues there?
-
And ACWWgal, please use proper capitalization and punctuation. We don't want our forum treated like a text message...
-
We should probably not speak too loudly about your involvement around Fraulein Trigger-Happy-Twat. But, I'm not sure if your previous scummy activities should factor into our thoughts about you. I admit that, at first, it seemed we would wonder about you non-stop until we knew for sure. However, I find it unlikely that God would assign you an affiliation on purpose. That being said, it was rather un-fair of God to bring you back here when it is likely people will judge you for...well...murdering everyone last time. I think it's safe to say that you're as likely to be scum as any of us. Perhaps our investigator will do you the favor of finding out for us and spreading the word somehow tomorrow... If we have to vote, perhaps it's best to get rid of loud people that call everyone and everything a shithole, even when it doesn't particularly fit correctly into the sentence they are speaking. Just a thought. No offense to anyone in particular. I wonder if we must include the b when unproxying.
-
Thank you for catching that. I feel rather dumb. So, we have to vote for someone. Interesting. I wonder how this will turn out.