Vincent Denis

*FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!* If you think my votes are pokes, then we just view the world differently. *FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM FWOMMA FWOMMA FWOOMA FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM FWOM FWOM FWOMMA FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!*

*Fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom* Justin pinged me yesterday and I pointed it out so I'm no pivoting or creating a narrative, I'm looking at new information and responding to it. Again, this is what we're supposed to do. You apparently don't think we should. You think we should think one thing forever and not let new information change our minds. When we get an investigation result that someone who everyone had thought to be a townie is in fact scum are you going to quote everyone who trusted that person and call them scummy for voting for the person with the scum investigation result? Our reading people's words and reacting to them is as powerful a tool as our night actions. Aiden and Alex could be seen as defending me. Do I trust them because they told you they disagree with your read? Absolutely not. It's a good place for scum to hide, the peacekeeper between two townies arguing (if you are, in fact, a townie). I noted that. Does it ping me? Yes. Does it ping me as hard as Justin? No. Especially since they seem to be attempting to be productive and point out to you that you're discouraging people from playing the game correctly. And yes, in Pirates 2, Paul and Reginald and Robert were accusing each other and you, Justin and Andrew are not. From my perspective in that game there were three people who drew attention to themselves and I thought "are these three townies or is one or more of them scum?" and then looked at their words and actions from there. It turned out one of them was scum and had he not claimed vanilla he was doing a pretty job as seeming to be working for the town. It reminds me of that because there are three people, from my perspective-Andrew, Justin and you-who have drawn attention to themselves and I'm wondering which one is scum. In Pirates 2, it was Paul who kind of stumbled into the middle of it. Who stumbled into the middle of this? Justin. It's the weakest reason of all to suspect Justin, but I felt it, so I mentioned it in case it was helpful to someone else. It's not helpful to you. Fine. And yes, I find poke votes scummy. Does that mean I think every poke vote is made by scum? No. Nuances seem to completely escape you. Perhaps you don't realize the complexity of the human brain and how curiosity and searching can spark thought, but that's the process I go through when hunting scum. I could ask Alexa about the literal synapse process if it will help answer all of your questions about my evolving opinion. *Fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwoooooom! *Fwom fwomma-pffffffft Look out, Daniel. Jean's analysis of Justin and Andrew has re-upped my initial suspicions of Andrew. Weird how us voicing our analyses causes our viewpoint to change. Weird that you think playing the game is suspicious. I look forward to your wall of text response exclaiming how interesting it is that my thought process continues to evolve. *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwooooooooom*

*Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom* This seems more reasonable. I find poke votes for people who haven't posted utterly stupid and the way you and Justin are rooster-strutting over your votes like you deserve a medal is comical. I'm much more for rooting up those who are flying under the radar. This seems to be where they hide in anonymous games or games with no PMs. I can chalk up my ping over what seemed like fishing as a difference in communication. It seemed pushy. Maybe you're just pushy. I'm considering you may be less scummy and more, what the French call "douche´." With a side eye on him, Unvote: Andrew Laurent Vote: Justin Reynauld For parroting Andrew, for placing a poke vote which could be a scum picking an inactive player as a safe place to vote and seem active, for nonsensically keeping his vote there like it's single-handedly causing all discussion and for deflecting the concerns raised against him. I'm summarizing because someone in the last game requested we do that when voting instead of just dropping a vote. (Or you could just read everything-) *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* What? *Fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom* This is all you have to say to the person you're voting for? You poked him to get him talking and now he has talked and you don't have any response to what he said? I'd like to ask that you answer to the people who have questioned your behavior. Your vote got everyone talking and it is somehow still getting us talking just by sitting there, poke-less? That's not what you said about the vote when you placed it: OK, so let's check what Andrew said: If that's all you read, maybe you'd think it means that poking one person gets all people active, which I find ridiculous. But Andrew added this which, to me, seems clear he means simply to get those who haven't posted to be active. It's almost like you're trying to parrot Andrew: Hmmmmm...this reminds me of the time we were infiltrated by pirates and three soldiers named Robert, Paul and Reginald got into a dust up early on. As it turned out, the one in the middle, Paul ended up being the scum. Which one of Andrew, Justin and Daniel is Paul? I think it may be Justin. I'd like to hear from Andrew first before switching my vote, though. He hasn't been here! You have and so has Joshua and he answered directly to you about not being here! There's a huge difference. How could you not see it for yourself? They're referring to me looking at Andrew so closely which isn't scummy. It's what we're supposed to do. And I wouldn't be posting so much about Andrew's four posts had you not swooped in to defend him and Justin. Defending two scummy poke-votes is suspicious and now I'm looking very closely at all three of you and encouraging others to do so. That's how the game is played. I am, by no means, trying to convince everyone to lynch Andrew. There are less active people who might be sitting back and watching townies fight while they laugh and wait to kill us at night. I felt pings from Andrew and I mentioned them. That's the way to infiltrate these spies from our ranks. Daniel, you can pick that apart all you like but it's not going to stop me from doing it. *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom— Is that so? Where? I said "There's not much to go on." You're inferring some need for serious information. And where would we get serious information on day one? We're supposed to look at what people have said and that's what I'm doing. I'm not saying someone would say "We have night actions, Andrew! Look at me, I'm the investigator, so don't worry!" I'm saying the mention of not having any and the double warning about how hard it's going to be to coordinate without constant PMing in the game could result in conversation where people unintentionally imply that they have actions. I said "seems a bit like fishing" and "subtle fishing." No where did I say Andrew came out and asked for roles. And wouldn't scum mention it in some innocuous-seeming conversation instead of being blatant? I can't believe I have to explain this. You seem to have switched your sarcasm meter to "off." You're saying I'm going too far in explaining my suspicion of you by saying I should've suspected you for something you did before you did it? Yes, I was seriously explaining that I didn't have clairvoyance. Since your meter is off, that's sarcasm. The point is-you're saying my suspicion of Andrew came "out of the blue" when the things I found him suspicious for (and looking back found even his first post suspicious) hadn't happened yet. *Fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwomma fwoma fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* You're right, I totally forgot to consider the posts that would come after mine when I posted that there was nothing to go on yet. I should've used my telepathic skills to make the case against Andrew at that point. Ooops, more scummy sarcasm. There's nothing helpful about poke votes. Especially when the host is asking for a replacement and it's clear that nobody is being poked. As for Justin, once the person has shown up, why leave your vote on them? Or if you still find them scummy, who not mention it. Justin seems to think he's achieved his success for the day and is on to other things. I read in our annals of a recent incursion on a clipper named The Enterprise, where the first poke vote was by scum and for scum. It's an easy place for scum to hide and look useful. Look, I poked someone who wasn't posting, I was helping the town. But, it's interesting that you're defending them and their votes. Why is that? Pretty early to find their actions legit and not question them and even label them "quite straightforward." Sorry this suspicion is out of the blue and I didn't think of it before you did it. I must be sarcastically fabricating an argument, right? Look at Andrew, for example. Not only is his poke vote pointless, he suggested we might not have any night actions. Since the last game was role madness, is he feeling around for agreement to see what the scum can get away with claiming, if forced? Is he fishing for role claims? Is he a townie looking for scum to claim vanilla? Who knows? But they're all good questions. But go ahead and look at me for claiming, after a page of nothing but giraffe and tube jokes, that I didn't have suspicions and then finding suspicions "out of the blue" a page later. There has also been a huge slow down in activity over the last 12 hours or so which makes me think one of the current votes may actually be onto someone. *Fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwoooooooooooom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwomma fwom* Congratulations Justin. Your vote and your vote alone got Justin talking. Nobody can tell you you're not a hero. Now that's he's been successfully poked, are you leaving your vote on him? *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom, fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom* ** got Joshua talking. *fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* I said earlier that these seemed like jokes but then I started thinking this type of joking is kind of WIFOM-ish. "I'll start by suspecting everyone who's posted before me. Scum would never do that." Coupled with the rest of Andrew's actions, I don't like it so much. The coin flips is what gets me here. Sounds like he's trying too hard to explain his actions. Also, "We don't know if we have any night abilities..." seems a bit like fishing to me. Maybe he's looking for someone to disagree with him. He's talking about getting us all organized, trying to encourage a town block and we know those can be infiltrated by scum who appear like well-intentioned townies. This is the second time he's tried to scare us over the PM restrictions and encourages us to talk more. About what? Our night actions or lack thereof? More subtle fishing. Great job Andrew! Look how much Michael has posted since you voted for him. Bob said he's looking for a replacement so you're likely poking nobody here. These actions seem like a townie over-eager to lead or a scum trying too hard to appear like a townie. There's not a lot to go on on day one and I could be barking up the wrong tree, but Andrew has posted for times and I've felt a ping in each one of those. Vote: Andrew Laurent *fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom* This one's a march so there's no fwommas *fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom*

*Fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwom* I am for a day one lynch typically, but if we had to vote right now, there's not much to go on. A lot of us haven't even checked in yet and this day may go down in our annals as the fluffiest on record. The only person even discussing the game was Andrew Laurent but that seems more like jokes and a sprinkle of xenophobia. I think we should all vote but there's nothing to go on right now. I had considered voting for Le Giraffe but then I fed him a palm frond and now we're friends. *Fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwooooooooooooooooooooom*

*fwomma fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom* Oh no no. Never a long blow, always short and controlled. I've been blowing since I was a wee lad and I've always blown short and controlled. You never want to blow long, you'll pass out. Short blows are good blows, no double entendre intended. @Justin Reynaud I wonder what the French word is for entendre? *Fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwoooom fwoooooooom fwoooooooooooooooom*

*Fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom* Either I've lost my mind or you guys are experiencing some sort of mass halluciantion. Giraffes? Boats? I thought we were in a fortress. *Fwom fwomma fwom fwom fwom fwomma fwomma fwom fwom fwoooom fwooooooooom fwoooooooooooooooooooom*

Not my turn for beard de-worming. *fwom fwom fwomma fwom fwom*

Hi! I'm Vincent, your friendly tubist! *Fwom fwom fwom fwoooom fwom fwomma fwomaa fwom fwom fwom* Such a beautiful insturment for serenades.