Daniel Lucas

If you have no idea what was it all about, you are welcomed to take your time and read it. Are you pleased with today's chaos? It seems chaotic for sure if you don't read it. I know, it is not easy to do with a thousand lines of fwooming, but it only gives more reason to do so. Also even if it is chaotic, it is also information. After your blank vote, please stop being so convenient with your neutrality posts. There you go. You may add your conlcusion I think. I understand your suspicion on Alex. Since I can only voice one with my votes I'm on Aiden now. I could have gone to Alex to be your second vote, but he is so going under the radar since we've accused him and I doubt a lynch would work on him because of this. Funnily enough this may had been his intention. He is also welcomed to come forth and prove otherwise. Also I'm just fed up with Aiden and Vincent now. If I'm truly so wrong about them I want to find out now. If we want to lynch, this is the time to decide. Justin has 2 and Aiden's got 3 votes. I think the 1 voters need to make the hard decision of choosing now if they truly want to lynch.

This clearly shows how serious your vote for me was. Since I accused you too, we can take that as some kind of a pseudo-revenge vote. It is still not clear what was your purpose with that if not only the thin hope of people jumping on that. Now you revenge vote Justin even more directly. If you are town, you two are just out of your mind. Honestly, you Justin, Andrew and Joshua's contribution were totally right on since the beginning. You are right about Aiden throwing empty and unspecific f-bombs all over the place. Also the Godfather note is a more useful in itself than all of their ~50 posts together. Andrew had a totally correct insight on Day 1 lynching and first votes, which was the whole idea he was picked upon by my 3 suspect. And Joshua is also right pointing out the danger of Vincent's and my debate. You were implying that we're both foolish townies, which is a bit of yes, and a bit of "meh". Foolish indeed because everybody just went lurking because of it. Only that I went along truly because of their respones which were just full on scummy and if you really have read all the lines you can see the serious difference in the quality and truth of the arguments taken. I'd totally discourage everybody just to come in, take a quick tl;dr look at this and quickly label it townie foolishness. No. This was exactly his tactic intention. Read all the lines, all the freaking lines and see the twisting and constant smoke-screening yourself, people. If we are truly both town I'm total mad at Vincent, since he is acting like a neurotic douche without his pills. Either it is the truth and he unprofessionally brings his immature nature into the game, or I just totally hit the nail on its head and this is the act he went to do. Vincent has truth in one thing: if some of you - Justin and Andrew, maybe Joshua - are scum, you are actually playing this game as intended. You are not only acting town but making actually useful and patient town inspections. A really good scum player would do that, just for the record. AND this is why I still have more disdain for Vincent and Aiden. If they'd be so aware of this possibility they've wouldn't had to go and twist things all over the place and act like two 14 years old pussies juts becaues they've got accused by an aggressive player on Day 1. I just truly can't believe if they are being such an experienced forum players (and confirmed ones, since they've started to break 4th wall) they would have truly induced this kind of shitstorm into these scales as Town. Only because of one f***ing initial vote on him. All they'd have to do is to reply in a patient, unpersonal, non-sarcastic and clear manner. All I did was pointing out their totally confusing, incoherent, twisting, fwoming and insulting behaviour and they've just kept on pushing it, like they'd have any certificate of being Town. They are talking about policy lynch, but at this point I'd be just totally satisfied to get rid of this annoying Fwomfwoming and empty bitching around. If they're town they're they're just horrible players. If this is not the case, this whole nonsense erratic show is just a local meta gameplay to sweep it under the rug and I cannot see the cause not being getting cornered by me. Like they're suffering all around from my annoying but right on punctuality. Also being arrogantly on a high horse constantly, like they supposed town play would be anything good even without arguments. No. It is a big pile of crap. If you are Town indeed Vincent and Aiden, your play is just bad. And if this is the level a decade of experience has brought you, I have to tell you: I'm not impressed. No. This is a bandwagon: Unvote: Vincent Denis Vote: Aiden Leon And I'm seriosuly hoping that the players out there who have openly enjoyed this whole deal in the background will finally make their decesion. Lynch these douchebags and let's just play the game in a professional manner finally.

Sure, no worries mate. I can do this all day anyway.

This is what happens when you go on with inbred players... Are you guys done? Not only your arguing skills are equaled only by a glass of urine, but you're ruining the game for others as well at this point. Also I'm still about to get all three of you lynched.

For the record: This is video is not an argument. Surely you are being helpful with this while I am not. You said you are on the offense against me. Yet you won't give any specific argument because I'm unreasonable. When I ask you to give me anything specific to prove my perfect ability for being reasonable, your answer is that I'm unreasonable. You are the one talking about me being in a loop. Also uNrEaSoNAbLe. You are voting for me, but you've said now twice that you think I'm town. You are okay with lynching a town, since I'm unreasonable. Honestly, you could have too convinced me of your innocance, just as Vincent. But this totally scummy attitude and your constant generic wishwash kept going on my suspicion. You can't stay consistent for a minute, can you? Again, can we just lynch one of them? I'm asking the other players. Clearly you have just enough information to decide which one of us should go today. You know my proposal: Alex, Aiden or Vincent.

Can we just lynch one of them already?

You are really something. Someone is unreasonable when you want to reason with them but can't. Let me show your so called reasons: This is you talking to Vincent: This is your responses to me: And to just about see who is being tunnel visioned These are your so called reasons. I'm sorry but I don't see you clearly doing an reasoning about my arguments being flawed. I only see myself as a merman and a very simple minded one, who is not an offense on Vincent but on a defense on Andrew and Justin(!). Would be interesting if someone else would be on a defense on Vincent without any sane reasons, wouldn't it? How accidental that both of you have pointed out me being more likely a Town. Very interesting I've managed to convince you about this so easily. Maybe I just had to point out your total unspecific and scummy behaviour. Have you heard of infinite scum bullshit? Take a look above about everything you've done so far. How about giving some specifics, hm? You clearly seem to ignore anything I've just pointed out about Vincent. Since I'm a merman with a simple mind it is not so surprising. He just explained himself to you about everthing. His constantly confusing fwooming, insulting, face punching, sarcasm, totally emotional and erratic tantrums and vote switching is all explained. But not me. Do you have any explicit things to say about any exact argument I've made? What you do is talking in this blank clichéd generic phrases. Come on, if I am so unreasonable just pick one argument and point out what I've failed about that while Vincent managed to stay crystal clear. There is absolutely 0% chance that a town player whould have not considered Vincent as scum just for a tiny bit already by his posts regardless of me being anything. So obvious that you are working together.

It is weird, yes. I'd very much like to hear from anyone who hasn't voiced any useable opinion since page 2. Since it is about you, you may try to prove me wrong with arguments. I. see. So you would lynch me even as a potential town because you think I'm a tunnel visioned liability. It is interesting you think so. Vincent has reasons to say, since I was very obvious about my suspicion about him. But for some reason you and Alex are all very well convinced that nothing has been wrong with what Vincent has just said. From the very beginning even before I've made any suspicion of you. It is only started to include you two, after you failed to even suggest or ask anything from him, while he was clearly no more townie as anybody at that point. All you gave was a pseudo-counterargument which ended up being insantly in agreement with him. You two came with the very same suggestive post that we shouldn't pick on Vincent because he was just doing his town duty. Almost simultaneously together after I've placed my initial vote on him. Also if I'm not helpful let me tell you: your contribution is almost zero except the aid you're giving to Vincent. Even now, nothing pings you about him. Not the fwoomings, the insults, the personal remarks, the vote switch, his whole erratic behaviour and quoting "blah blah" from me. Not to meniton my arguments. There are 3 pages of debates and you don't even have any questions to him, nor me. I may be wrong about him but for some reason you two are SO convinced he is to be trusted. Also that I'm a liability. What do you expect anyway? Not being "tunnel visioned" because you gave me already so many clear arguments? You read all our debate with Vincent and you picked everything apart that I've wrongly said, pointed them out and I'm still being stubborn about it? No Aiden. You are being accused as well and you don't like this. And you are very much hoping to take focus off yourselves.

For your information, this is mafia and we are giving suspicions. It is quite well-founded from me, believe me. It was not a personal remark or an insult. It was a game-based opinion. Okay. Fair enough, let's assume I am a fool. What it is supposed to mean? That you won't even start arguing me? Well, you are the one who voted for me so maybe you'd like to think twice about that. Also why voting for a fool then? I thought I was voted because I'm taken as scum.

How do you know no one is reading along? You are talking in the name of others. No one asked nor authorized you to do that. You are again just trying to project a picture in the name of the whole town, because at this point you are totally done and tangled in your own contradictions. If I'm your most sure town read you would have just started to work with me already, since you say you are town too. Only that it seems you do not like my also totally valid observation of Alex either. You call yourself an honest town, but all you do is now is trying to sweeping my whole theory under the rug. There is no "Them". You are refering to Alex and Aiden who I accused as well long ago. Clearly I can't be your best town read if everthing you say about Alex is just an aimed attack back to me. Town would only do that if they would not trust me. But I am your most sure town read, remember? By now all the things you have thrown at me should have indicated you at least think of me as a potential scum. The thing is I'm not your most townie read. You seem to know for a FACT, that I'm town. Again just a suggestive sentence to paint yourself as town. I would be the most surprised here if you'd be turn town now, believe me. You are talking of yammering and long posts but look at yours. It was you who gave long sarcastic paragraphs and fwoooms just after the very first vote of this game. Your hypocrisy is in the skies. Your arguments are amorphous like hell. Take a quick look, please: Nice welcome? Real class act? You're so done with your act, Vincent. You just said he may not be a noob. But you were totally convinced he is a noob to attack me in the previous post. Me, your most sure town read. Also he used terms like "fishy" and your "rose garden" one. A real town would never believe he is a noob player at this point. It seems I've pointed out very good arguments indeed because he became a "he may not be a noob" very fast! And you are accused by me of being a scum buddy of Vincent and Alex. Just to talk plain and clear. But I'm happy you've managed to make such a concise conclusion from our debate. It seems you've read all of it and this is what you honestly think of me. Being useless. I'll take your vote with honor. Also if you'd like me helping, come and have some talk. Don't lurk. Answer my first question from page 2 from a start, since you failed to react to that. But something tells me after my debate with Vincent you don't dare to do sh*t. You clearly see I am most perfectly capable of handling you three all myself.

I've just pointed out why I think he is no noob. He acts like a puzzled child but makes a totally valid and experienced observation one line later. Also I did meant this question from you as anything offensive, I was really interested in your opinion. Because if you are town they're are still totally going under the radar and acting like two lambs. I don't believe they are. How did you jump on me this time and not on him? I was accusing Alex because of still being wishywashy, as I've done so eariler. Again: This is a totally a forced reason not to read our debate or not to give voice any opinion. I doubt any town would be that lazy. Do you think my argument is invalid here? Dont you think everyone should read that, because you sounded very sure of yourself. You've said many times that you were 100% honest and you were helping town. Then why are you not upset of Alex jumping this shady over the whole thing? If you were right the whole time that debate would prove you right. Thus you should be just as annoyed by him ignoring it as I am. BUT NO. From the two of us, as totally honest town you pick on me. You said before that I am your MOST SURE townie read despite being angry with me. Then why are you not picking on Alex but on your most sure town read? I was just letting you go, saying already I had to say and try not to be tunnel visioned as you've said. You completely know I've voiced my theory about You, Alex and Aiden. If you were truly town and you were truly giving the opportonutiy to inspect them instead of us being at each other's throat this would've been the reasonable step. So I ask again: What is your opinion on Alex. You do really believe he is a noob? Okay. Then his opinion on Robin's lurking was also a noob observation? What is your opinion on that?

When it comes to me and Vincent you are wishwashing around so hard my head aches to it. Stop acting like a senseless child in a serious matter only to act totally reasonable otherwise 2 freaking lines later. "All a bit too much? You can't make a hea nor a tail of it?" Give. Me. A. Damn. Break. You have just pointed out the same thing about Robin's very recent and totally lurking, useless post so it is clear you are completely capable of paying attention and read everything. And it was already ENOUGH to jump and vote on him. You were just complaining that you can't make anything out of my argument with Vincent. But you vote for someone else a line later for not providing more opinions? Why would you need more opinions? You just said "You'll be sore and worn out before we have even started huffing and puffing like that!". You are totally fake. Also Vincent, since you've mentioned I could be wrong about you but that does not mean Aiden and Alex are not defending you as scums, I'm really interested in your opinion of them.

Possibly he is the one being replaced as he hasn't made any posts yet. Also if he is a deadman in that case why are you voting for him? This is blank vote without the need to say anything specific. Also it is the 5th page of this discussion and you are still at the giraffe. Don't you think we're past that?

You repeatedly say that I've insulted you and then you insulted me ten times. You know what? I think we really have to arrive to a conlusion at last, because this is getting out of hand. You asked me a question and I've answered in the most pateint manner as I've just could considering the possibility of you being town, since you asked. Your reply is again immature, inaccurate and useless. It seems you was not even interested in my answer. Seems it was again just an act as well. Even know you are not able to answer to my questions on the other hand without twisting and quoting it as "blah blah". You are either acting undignified for a town or you are totally being hunted as a scum right at the beginning and you are just trying to save yourself. Also your so humble summary of my reasons against you is the most twisting thing I've read so far. Like you would be the best candidate to summarize the accusation taken against you. You are using 100% scum tactics and I'd lynch you right here, at the spot. This is the point when we really have to put this aside and let the other's decide. We've made some long text walls but I encourage everybody to read everything carefully to get a best picture of the things happened here.

Yes. If you are town I'm totally on a wrong track by going to this direction. But let the future decide that. Until then, are you really town? Okay. Then why are you fwooming around? Why are you being sarcastic, cocky, insulting, calling yourself frustrated and emotional while clearly having a lot of time to make patient responses. For me it is a tell of feeling the well-grounded heat. If you'd town and wanted to stay concise, you could've started this 10 posts ago without any of this confusing padding texts and personal remarks. But okay, you asked now a totally valid question. If you are town I have to think about my tunneling here as quite unhelpful. Also IF you are town, you are doing it wrong. Have you realized Town's main weapon is to be simple, clear and consistent? Look at my first vote on you: And now take a look at your answer to this: No one was asking you to know things beforehand they happen. I had a feeling about your implications on waiting for some well-grounded information and I've found it to be forced. That's it. But your whole attitude just went crazy right at the first moment. And you talk about my ego. If you are Town dear Vincent, you should not play this game. Period. You could have made this much more cleaner for Town right there. If you are really town you clearly can't help yourself to bring your cocky, easily offended nature into this game. There is absolutely no reason to about 30% of your texts contributed here so far. Their only function up to this point is to make it hard to others to read long texts and understand why am I going after you. So there it is, my answer. I still think you have skipped most of my inconvenient questions with the garnishing of your fwomfwomy insulting, emotionally wish wash. Just for the sake of town, answer this previous one: You skipped your logical fallacy you presented us here. "They seem the scummiest to me." That is all your answer to this? That is just a general, unusable phrase given to some serious contradictions at this point. Every time you start to elaborate why do you truly take them as both scum, you start to contradict your own actions. You voted Andrew. After you got a repsonse, you said it is at least something to switch to Justin and you used reasons for it that was already clear to us. If Andrew is truly scum, his answer should have not given you anything to unvote him. Your switch was a town-act. In my eyes you are ACTING like a town, but your reasons are totally unreasonable as a real town. You even go quickly to say Andrew is an OK Lynch after Jean votes for him as well, quickly calling him the more dangerous again. Well too late, isn't it? Shouldn't have switched the vote if you'd think Andrew to be more dangerous. Even if you think both of them scum, you don't flip-flop until you finally get a lynch on them. Maybe someone has already pointed it out, but it only shows how FORCED it is. Do you know what I think why have you switched? Because I was onto you already and you were so eager to act town, instead of doing the actual reasonable thing as a town by keep voting for Andrew, not to mention you've made some pretty elaborative accusation of him.

For the the love of the Clipper, I would even try to take a look at others, but what you are doing is so forced, uninformative, useless and scummy, that you are just keep feeding me with my suspicion to you. Is it uncanny? Are you frustrated as well, like Vincent? Why don't you just vote then? Why would this really change my mind? Just honestly Aiden, you are now doing the very same thing as Vincent. I've called out my suspicion on you, yes. And this is what you can say about this? Why would playing the offended town and giving back the same insults about my simple mind would do any more good for the town cause? Let me give you back: If you are town, you are doing it wrong and making it needlessly personal. Even if you are town, we would have no assurance of that, so stop implying that we should act so anyways, Oh, such a coincidence that you do accuse me of defending them! Let's see: How interesting, you are so eager to look at our actions so objectively, but for some reason you were leaning on to agree with Vincent, now you play the same narrative only to say you can't see my actions anything else than just a defense towards the poke voters. You clearly can use your imagination if you want to. Truly, this difference of this objective leaning is not because I have a suspicion on you, isn't it? Do you have anything exact to say? Why don't you just take your vote? You seem to believe in Vicent quite fast (again), but you add nothing to it just keep pushing in the same manner that made be believe you are wishy washing the heat from him at the first time. It is stinky at this point that you've observed so manny uncanny things but had no time to take a vote. Also, if you'd take it on me, that'd be just a point in my argument. That's why you are not doing it, isn't it? Then stop acting like you'd have a scum read on me. Clearly you are not. Is this experience like a rule without exceptions now? I'm not sure this should be enough of an argument fhere. If I'm on a right track with Vincent, it is not the smallest of heat a scum would have on Day 1 isn't it? I'd say it could very cause a situation well suited for an exception. But again. I may be wrong. I'm just reacting to their scummy posts since. Your arguments Vincent is so confusing and incosistent that I'm just almost begging you to stop. You just switched voting from Andrew to Justin. You said it is because Justin feels more scummier. But if they are both scum how Andrew is the more dangeours out of the sudden? You just switched to Justin, which is suggesting quite a bit that you don't think both of them to be scum. Why? Because If you'd really think both of them to be scum and Andrew is the more dangerous, you would not even have switched for the first time, saying Justin is scummier. But you did switch. And you would be STILL OK with an Andrew lynch all the same? What is that supposed to mean? That if a wagon starts on Andrew, you'll be happy to flip back again on him? It is soo obvious you think neither of them scum at this point. This is a charade. Your own motivations of suspicion don't add up as a town. You see this is the only reason why I am not onto Andrew and Justin. Not because I know anything sure about them. It is because I totally see that you have information about them not making you believe either of them as scum and only a scum would be able to do so on Day 1.

I can't even fathom how swiftly you are using your disdain to twist and jump over my point again. Also you may stop talking in the name of others already, like you were some kind of town majority here. Your whole post is about these hidden suggestive elements all over the place. This is why I'm still onto you even at this very moment. You're dragging the whole thing into a total wifom. I'm being insulting? I. am. being. insulting. Okay. Just how many times did you mention my decreased brain functionality? Let me help you: Honestly twisting it back and calling me insulting is a reason to lynch you already on its own. I've voiced this suspicion over those two players two pages ago. This is just one single example of how inconsistent your post is. To be clear, I've voted you in an initially brief post because of your seemingly forced and far-fetched attitude towards a very first vote taken in this game. Everyting else has just escalated of you being totally questionable, patronizing and simply scummy since. I've just said in my last post that I may be wrong and we have to wait this out, but clearly you had to start all over again. Now you are saying I can't shut my mouth - considering we're both very much being talkative - is WIFOM defense. Pointing out that I need to have the last word, while you are clearly eager to have it yourself is also a useless WIFOM defense. You are trying to sound frustrated and tired but still using so calculated and shady tools to create this symphaty needed stand. You could totally have caused me to change my mind if you'd just dropped this pompous self pity act and actually replying to my observations with explicit logical follow-ups and not some general garnishing and nonsense talking with totally irrevelant padding texts and picky remarks. You were just looking forward 5 hours ago to see my response. Now you are in this frustrated and enjoyment-losing act of yours. Which is fake. Do you know why? Because you still have found the energy to Fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom fwom all around your post all the same.

I said when someone feels scummy about something they think there is a scum behind that. Thus the term scummy. What you are talking about is the possibility of them being wrong. You are clearly twisting the whole reference here, since this is not what you've said before. Making offensive remarks while trying to act as the consistent one, won't help my vote against you. You are still playing along on your original twist, which was saying you do not think every poke voter is scum, while also saying every poke vote is scummy. Either you think it is scummy because a scum would do it or you don't. You might have said someone intentionally acts scummy. Would not make too much sense unless their win condition is suicide, but you interestingly did not point this out, meaning you did not even really thought about this. Yes, give me a break, because you're full of sh*t and your attitude is unwarranted. But you surely had to vote for Andrew because of this (thus making your vote a poke just the same), since you said you're waiting for his reply. He talked indeed, quickly voting for someone else, since he never denied his initial one as a poke vote (means you got no information we did not already know) and you switched to Justin, acting like you'd have had magically recieved a better reason to do so. As I've pointed out the arguments you used for this were already known and pointed out before. If you really would think Justin to be the perfect lynch candidate, you wouldn't have had to wait for a totally redundant post from Andrew. Yes, exactly. Only as I've pointed out above, you are all talk but your actions do not overlap with this. You know the script very well Vincent, I give you that. Now this is clever. My face is actually stuck in 3 different tunnels, considering that Aiden and Alexed just jumped to aid you out of nowhere almost simultaneously, while you were quite chatoic with accusing someone as a tryhard (while with your new vote it is now crystal clear that your behaviour and intentions were as tryhard at least the same way) and feeding your focus on the quite simple and open poke voters, I'd say they've came to quickly wishy wash away my observations of you: He talked about poking yes, but for some reason missed talking about Vincent, except his potential giraffe riding contribution. Wish-wash. Interesting. Vincent is searching with intent, but me pointing his questionable things out are not searching with intent. This is pure hypocrisy. Wish-wash. What nonsense? Also If you think so, you may take your vote in the matter, right? I think my making of the information we have at the moment is clear: Vincent is my suspicion and Aiden and Alex were trying to take away my initial heat on him with questionable reasons in my opinion. The two poke voters are not cleared but nothing twisting was going on with that. Either you believe their poke intentions to be true or not. Forcing some far-fetched fabricated narrative into it is much scummier. With the other ones nothing much happened since. I may be wrong but let's see how the day concludes. Until further notice I'll be at the Clipper, checking the riggings out to be sure. Maybe taking a quicky-quick look at the rum storage.

You have ALREADY voted for two of them. Also this is not even a reply to what I was refering to, I've pointed out the difference of your narrative for the very similar cases, not your tendency in taking poke voters scummy. Also if you think poke vote is scummy why do you not always believe they are made by actual scums? Why is it scummy then? You mean scummy town? Or not-scum scummy? What are you talking about? I'm using the word scummy for things I believe scums would do. Clearly you are not.

Oh, my bad. Only that part is missing when answer and clarify what was your vote if not an empty poke as well. Since I'm bad with nuances let see again: Very interesting! Oh wait... So when you vote for Andrew, it is because you think it might be a scum for scum poke vote. But you flip to the other poke voter and now you accidendtaly not using the scum for scum scenario. You are saying Justin is scum picking an inactive to be safe placed. How is the first one was the scum for scum but the next one was not? Maybe because at this moment you'd fit into the scum for scum vote right away? Convenient to forget your own argument in certain situations, isn't it?

Exactly. That's why I'm voting for you if you haven't noticed. Also, what are your votes if not pokes? Serious decisions? You already had two of them. You gave reasons which were given already way before both of them said anything neww, while clearly you've tried to imply you were looking for new information. I don't think it is the case. You are not poke voting. You are flip-flop poke voting.

Fwooming around constantly and acting cocky does not serve you right with your statements. Also, you just wish nuances would've escaped me. If so, I would still not be voting for you. Which is exactly what the poke voters were doing according to them. Practicall you've just poke voted the poke voter. Argued a lot about Andrew, but flipped to the next poke voter, Justin, like suddenly he would be a better scum candidate for some reason. You flip-flopped just as they've done so. You see, if you want nuances I'll give you one: You might convince me that "poke voting is scummy". If that's the case you are acting just the same. Only that the chaotic way you do this just give you the edge in my voting. Again you are keep walking into your own accusing arguments.

Don't you think it is interesting that after you've argued so so much (which was the cause of me calling you forced and pushing) against Andrew, you're just so eager to say you think Justing IS the scum from the three of us? You were reminded of three previous players and you just built upon this thought instantly. Also why their similar preference to day 1 lynching has anything nothing to do with Robert, Reginald and Paul? This is not very consistent train of thought, more like a tool you've just trying to project a narrative into. And again Robert, Reginald and Paul were accusing each other. How it become similar Andrew, Justin and me? You can point out someone as scum from the three of us, that's how. For the record I am not defending the two poke voters, I'm accusing you. There is a difference. Also I did point out that Aiden and Alex did come seemingly (and quite synchronised) to your aid with obviously less arguments that I've contributed. I find it interesting that they've discarded what I've said about you quite easily and - surely by chance - going after the very two people you were focusing to. And again, you just said you would wait for Andrew until switching to Justin. But what could Andrew possibly provide you which would be any different that Justin is going to give you as well? You clearly don't give a damn about the poke votes themselves.

Well well, I did see a pattern. How surprising you've seen one as well, dear Vincent. Let's see: Your analogy of historical situations is quite wrong. Those three you mentioned were arguing against each other if my memory serves me correctly, and believe me, it does. Now the three present gentleman you are trying to project this is the two poke voter and my humble self. The only problem that I vote for you at the moment. Interesting, you are looking closely indeed. But it seems they did not like me looking closely at you. For some reason they seem to have found some kind of quality difference between the two. I'm honored that you don't think it is me. No, instead you are thinking to switch for the other poke voter. You would just abandon a poke voter for another. This clearly shows how seriously you took an initial poke vote. My vote on you stands.