THELEGOBATMAN

I, on the other hand, really liked this season. It also has a huge set potential too. I would love a set with baby dinos, especially the hybrid (it's really hard to name it, as there's just a one-letter difference in the names of the DNA providers) I really hope this increases the chances of Spinosaurus showing up in a set.

I need Peacemaker in a LEGO set right now

We were talking about the monster from the NWH Sanctum Workshop set

I'd also love it. We need an actual Asgard sets. I think that 2 sets for L&T will be enough to cover the movie, unless they really want to include all of the characters. Nah, I'm pretty sure it's just a thing made-up by LEGO.

Really well written honestly, I agree Let's leave the 'how important she is in the movie' discussion at that. She's just really important in the movie. I don't really understand people and their 'you can just Bricklink her' argument tho. Some people don't want to add a minifigure made for another series or movie to the mix, they want their products to be complete. So if they advertise Wanda on the box, twice, I expect her to be included. They wouldn't have to make a single new print or mould. Heck, they'd even cut costs by excluding dual-moulded arms. Those are the two main reasons as to why I don't understand why she's not included.

At first we all thought so, but later it turned out that this set number is actually the Trench Run diorama set. Garbage Compactor is still coming, but we don't know the set number, nor the price and piece count.

In other news, Stone Wars revealed some interesting info. The mystery 100€ set, 76209, is coming out in March - same date as both Love and Thunder sets (76207 and 76208). Is it just a coincidence that those 3 sets are coming out the same month, with matching set numbers? Wonder what that set could be if not another Thor set... Also, the 80€ Wakanda Forever set, 76214, is coming out in August. Since we got to know about this set's existence later than the other 3, it might suggest that the whole wave got pushed back to August (which would make sense with the movie's November release date).

Next year, but it depends if you mean just the set numbers, or descriptions / set names. Set numbers usually pop out rather soon, for descriptions we have to wait a little more.

Nothing big, but thanks to Stone Wars we know that both 75339 and 75342 are coming out in May (prices and puece counts still unknown). One of them definitely has to be the Garbage Compactor diorama, wonder what the other one could be...

All I'm saying is that Wanda's role is substantial in the movie, and she should've been included in the set. The fact that she's on the box art makes it even more ridiculous. He's on the box 6 times because his minifigure is included. If Wanda was included, she would've been on the box 5 times, same as Wong or Chavez. I don't get what you're trying to prove with this argument. And yes, some of us do know how important characters are in this movie. And because of what I know, it feels even weirder that she wasn't included. It did have a really substantial leak, and the sources are as reliable as they get. But that's not what I'm here to talk about. Wanda's role is big. She's on the box, twice. Including them would've been so easy. Yet she's not there, which sucks. And no, including her would not increase the price of the set. This set us overpriced as it is. 30€ sets can include 4 minifigures. What you're saying is simply wrong - there would be no new torso, hairpiece and legs, because they've already made it for the CMF. It already exists, so it couldn't have been new. Plus, she has full dark red arms in the movie, so there would be no need for dual-moulding I probably would've bought it if not for the monster. I have no problem with sets that don't include spoiler elements from the movie, but I do have a problem with sets that are inaccurate.

The thing is, no one had to choose. It could've easily been both. He's not. He may be the protagonist, but Wanda's role will be more substantial (well, perhaps not in terms of screen time, but who knows).

The price would be exactly the same lol. Of course she doesn't need to be included, but Wong or Chavez also don't need to be included, yet here we are. She's the most important character in the movie. She's on the box, twice. Including her minifigure would cost them nothing. Yet she's not in the set.

She doesn't need dual-moulded as in ITMoM. Not only would the CMF variant remain exclusive, but they also wouldn't need to make any new prints, and they'd cut down costs because of using regular arms instead of dual-moulded.

No means they should've included Wanda instead of America, but as a 4th minifigure.

Because it would be illogical to be mad at this set for this reason. LEGO didn't promise us this, it was a rumour from a certain source.

Which is an even better reason why to include her - they don't have to make any new prints, just reuse an old minifigure with some minor updates.

January 1st. Precisely, because the dual-moulded arms are inaccurate to ITMoM. She has full Dark red arms there. It would've been so easy to alter her suit and make it more accurate to the movie. Not to mention that she's the most prominent character in the movie, and she should've been included in the only set for this movie.

I love how the front and back of the box are virtually the same as they have nothing more to show I didn't notice it at first, but I love that they used mid legs for America. It's also ironic how Wanda is on the front and back of the box (in LEGO form), but not in the set. It would've been so easy to include her - get rid of the cape and add dark red arms without dual-moulding. I love the other minifigures tho. There's a lot to love about this set - except for the price and the fact that the most important character from the movie isn't in the set, even tho including her would've been so easy.

Well, the rumour was fake after all... can't be mad at the set itself tho. I honestly like both of those sets. For a 15€ Accessory Set they look good enough. Still don't like the fact that they are basically smaller Battle Packs tho.

He doesn't, he just said that there are no NWH sets in 1HY 2022. CM4Sci was actually a really reliable leaker, as much as, for example, FalconFan is now. He just stopped leaking info, but he still knows things. If CM4Sci says there are no NWH sets in 1HY 2022, then there are no NWH sets in 1HY 2022.

We know that the mystery 20€ set releases in April, so if the mystery 100€ set also does, then the Accessory Set also could release in April, so that it could be considered a small The Infinity Saga wave.

True, we don't even know the set number. Since we got info on 2 SW Accessory Sets and The Infinity Saga one on the same day from the same source, I just assumed they must be releasing the same month. I still hope it's January tho.

Wonder when they'll reveal Spider-Man sets and the Accessory Set... I am pretty excited to see what the latter is based on.

Well, can't wait to see those sets today. Might be interesting.

I didn't expect NWH sets in 1HY, but it's still disappointing to hear... Well, fingers crossed for 2HY. That also means that Fulcrum's rumour about 2 more NWH sets was false, as he couldn't have heard about 2022 2HY sets so long ago. Wonder what the 20€ and 100€ sets are then...