Jump to content

LEGODalekbuster523

Banned Outlaws
  • Posts

    1,880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LEGODalekbuster523

  1. They managed to include the Fantastic Four in the first game though, so it can't be a merchandise rights issue.
  2. I'll be happy if there's simply a new Hogwarts set. I really want to be able to build Hogwarts out of LEGO!
  3. I don't see why they'd be saving money. The terrible 2015 reboot is not enough to kill the interest others have in these characters. I'm glad to see at least one Agents of SHIELD character included. I hope we see some others alongside Quake.
  4. I would imagine by advertising it all over social media. Twitter would probably be a good way to do it.
  5. That would be amazing, although the Years 1-4 and 5-7 remaster collection probably makes that unlikely now.
  6. They haven't with Toy Story. Toy Story 4 comes out in 2019.
  7. It just seems silly not having Marvel's first family.
  8. It's not the roster that would be the problem, it's how many levels they could get from two films. Given most LEGO games cover three-four films, surely it would be wiser for them to wait for a third Incredibles movie? We don't know how long the second Incredibles film is yet. Maybe if it's one hour 56 minutes like the first film, but anything less and they'd surely have to really stretch it out. If we are to get The Incredibles in a LEGO videogame, I definitely think your suggestion of one overall LEGO Pixar game would work better.
  9. They should be. Disney-Marvel have the rights to use the Fantastic Four in anything that isn't a film. LEGO should have delivered Disney an ultimatum - "We will only make the game if you will let us use the Fantastic Four".
  10. I hope there will be a new Hogwarts set. Missed out on that one last time.
  11. But where's the Fantastic Four?
  12. A LEGO Incredibles game would be interesting, but would there be enough content? I know LEGO Avengers covered two movies, but it also included scenes from other Marvel Cinematic Universe films. I suppose they could include the sequel videogame The Incredibles: Rise of the Underminer.
  13. Jaws would be too dark for LEGO, surely?
  14. The only thing that might stop it is whether they can sort out a deal with Hasbro to use Mr Potato Head. It would be odd if he wasn't in the game.
  15. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a LEGO Toy Story game.
  16. We just need to make our voices heard to Marvel that we want these characters in their merchandise and we want them now, so Marvel: stop messing about!
  17. Because debating whether the Fantastic Four are in the game is more interesting.
  18. I'd love a Scat the squirrel minifigure.
  19. Fantastic Four - Yes X-Men - No
  20. A Harry Potter CMF series makes more sense as there's many more iconic Harry Potter characters in comparison to Back To The Future, especially if you add in Fantastic Beasts. A Series 1 could have: 1. Harry Potter 2. Ron Weasley 3. Hermione Granger 4. Newt Scamander 5. Tina Goldstein 6. Jacob Kowalski 7. Rubeus Hagrid 8. Dumbledore 9. Severus Snape 10. Queenie 11. Griphook 12. Dobby 13. Lord Voldemort 14. Neville Longbottom 15. Grindelwald 16. Credence That would still leave room for a Series 2, with plenty of Harry Potter and Fantastic Beasts characters left out.
  21. Not really. The only characters the general audience care about are Doc and Marty.
  22. With both this and LEGO Marvel Superheroes 2, it feels like they're taking more risks now rather than making each game the same.
  23. On the other hand, the Fantastic Four are returning to the comics as the 'Fantastic Two'.
  24. This is a rare case where the videogame based on the film looks better than the movie.
×
×
  • Create New...