Jump to content

aeh5040

Eurobricks Knights
  • Posts

    802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by aeh5040

  1. No need to wait for that - it's just Pythagoras!
  2. The all important 8t / 64t is the same spacing as 36t / 36t. I just tried this at the (4.2) grid point and it works nicely - not too tight for most purposes.
  3. Actually the 64t monster is looking a bit awkward for spacing. Besides the 16t at exactly 5 studs, the only reasonably good fits in the 1:1 studless technic grid seem to be: 8t at (4,2) (i.e. 4 studs across, 2 studs up), 0.03 studs too tight 24t at (5,2), 0.11 studs too tight 36t at (6,2), 0.07 studs too loose I did not investigate using technic bricks and plates yet.
  4. It would certainly make sense if they were stretched slightly, and if the material was chosen accordingly.
  5. I might be wrong but it looks to me as if the holes at the end of the spokes are slightly angled to allow for the offset - look at the shadows on the table. If so, this shows nice attention to detail, but I do wonder about wobble, and it will limit their usefulness for anything else. Interestingly, the 64t gear will only mesh exactly in grid with a 16t (for a 1:4 ratio) or with itself. Of course there should be plenty of scope for meshing with other gears at diagonal approximations to the right spacing, as usual. Very excited about the new parts, in any case!
  6. Yes, quite so! I don't really understand why such things are so rare these days. Surely there must still be plenty of people interested in serious discussion of specialised topics. But getting them together seems like a constant struggle. Anyway, I'm glad we have that here. We should all do our best to nurture it!
  7. Wow, not only a great recolor but that looks like a really nice set, and not absurdly expensive.
  8. I am definitely counting 64 too. Exciting times!
  9. I had similar experiences, but I had not quite understood the explanation. Thanks for the this - it's good to know for the future! Very interesting info!
  10. I would like the yellow part (except with a pin hole not a axle hole at the bottom middle), and possibly the green. Apologies if this has been suggested already.
  11. In case people haven't seen, these beauties are now available at last
  12. In my experience (from shows, etc.) knob gears are actually terrible for high torque applications (contrary to what I expected). They degrade very quickly, then develop very high friction, and finally start flaking off pieces. After a few experiences like this I decided never to use them again.
  13. That axle problem is appallingly bad. Looks as though the designer did not consult anyone with Technic experience.
  14. Yes there is. In fact there is a neat ratchet mechanism which serves as a noise maker when lifting off and supplies friction against going down again. (Pretty much how a real rocket works in fact !)
  15. Isn't there a friction pin in the gear train?
  16. I'm not completely convinced. The core complaint seems to be: there are now more technic sets of the kind that we don't particularly like, but roughly the same number as before of the kind that we do like. As my phrasing implies, I broadly share the opinions about which ones I like. But logically this phenomenon itself should not be a concern. We can just buy the sets that we like. It should not really matter whether there are other sets that happen to bear the same theme name. This has happened in the past with Bionicle etc. Perhaps there are deeper suspicions that the kind of sets we like may be phased out on grounds that they are less profitable. To be honest that has always been a concern for me. Has it become more likely recently? I don't know. All we can really say is that it has still not happened yet.
  17. You are absolutely right. Thanks for writing all this. Having experienced the culture of large corporations from the inside, I think it's very unlikely that anyone in a position of power in TLG has ever even considered any of these points. When money is flowing, the human mind suppresses awkward questions.
  18. Very cool constructions! As usual, I find myself struggling to understand exactly what is going on here!
  19. Very cool! I'm amazed at how well it steers. I'm curious how it would perform with rubber track inserts.
  20. This is absolutely brilliant - I never thought of doing that!
  21. Indeed. I am glad about this, mostly because the more recent molds of 20t double bevels (especially tan) had horrendous meshing problems, for reasons I never understood.
  22. I'm a bit in two minds about this. It looks like a lot of gears for not that many functions. Of course I like gears, but I also like optimal solutions. In any case, I'm sure I'll buy it...
×
×
  • Create New...