Jump to content

Asphalt

Eurobricks Dukes
  • Posts

    3,141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Asphalt

  1. If you really want to know, I’ve never seen anyone claim a power role like that so I wasn’t sure how to respond. I have no way to confirm or deny his claim. No evidence to either side and it’s not like he can either. He is either being honest and put a scum target on himself or he is lying and attempting to pull more town down in the next vote. Only way to tell is to see how this day goes. He is certainly drawing attention to himself though. I will give him that. As far as I see it his declaration will at the very least keep him out of the voting. If we are to believe his claim anyone who votes for him today will be called out as being moles. So I guess it is a good move for him either way.
  2. Really just wanted to know why he was onagainst him. And I didn’t have a strong read on him one way or another.
  3. *puts his hands up and backs away from his bloody saw wielding boss* Woah Boss, I think you might be getting a little too into your post act report. Come on Everyone, If we don't get our blocks in order we aren't going to have any town left. Loosing Kaster like that, does not help our chances with these moles. We need a strategy and some hard evidence. Benson you were pulling a whole lot of attention yesterday, this mass quote isn't going to push that away.
  4. How much time do we have left to work this out? A no lynch day is not what we want for day three.
  5. Yeah bob you have a point. I honestly do not have a solid read on anyone and yours is the only vote. I can agree that some of Benson’s comments were odd and he has kinda ghosted through the days. So for lack of better perps. I am throwing in with you. Hope it doesn’t bite us. If someone else has a stronger case to push I am open to evidence. Vote Benson( LEGOmonorailfan)
  6. Did Benson have anything to say about it?
  7. You had me to here. Is it a typo or am I reading it wrong?
  8. You have been going for him hard since the start. Like you have him holding the proverbial smoking gun. Or in our case the dripping hammer. I don’t deny you have posted some reasoning. But for as adamant as you are about it I wonder if there is more that would convince us to go along with you.
  9. I'm still looking for the reason you are so out to get him.
  10. I didnt propose it. I was wondering if that was a possibility or if anything like that had ever happened. Just playing with numbers. My last game had no penalty votes so to have two in one day just made me think. And as it turned out it wasn't even a possible thing. Based on the votes from yesterday I would also agree that it would be odd for the moles to pile onto a sure thing. But EVERYTHING about yesterday was odd. Wording, penalties, self destruction. It was an odd hour. I will be keeping my eyes on Mr. Benson and Dr. James. They were the only two with any hint of momentum to their being voted for yesterday. I need to go back through and see if I can find the evidence that put them forward.
  11. I wasn't really advocating for it, just thinking out loud and wondering if there was ever a situation where something like that has happened before. It would kinda be the Sharknado of voting outcomes. Vote Officer Lewis (JamesN) And if we are going through the evidence log I can see no indication of guilt for either of those individuals.
  12. just chose to go out suicide by mob. So the decision to be made now is do we go for a double or even triple lynch. Or do we intentionally spread out our votes to avoid losing too many town players at once. With 14 players would could eliminate three today if we organized the votes correctly. One 8 man vote and two three votes for the penalty players. Has that ever happened?
  13. Hold your Mop there Bob, if you look at my posts I had just reminded my vote on Lewis and I was looking for someone else to look into. Your wording caught my eye and since most players restate their reasoning in their vote post I was looking for clarification on yours. This days has been nuts. And now, Officer lewis has pretty much zip tied himself to the chair. What is going on? WHAT IS GOING ON? The jester thing came up in my last game when a player apparently went nuts. Can they win if they are dead?
  14. With my vote taken back I have been reading and rereading todays posts and I keep coming back to this one. It makes absolutely no sense to me. It definitely looks to me like Dr. James is trying to get a PR to reveal himself in thread or through PM.
  15. What do you mean by that Bob? How why are you satisfied. Why are you leading for a lynch on Benson. At this point I have very little suspicion to go on. Block just realized I parroted MT's post. That's what I get for writing before I finish reading. Still want an explanation though.
  16. ok Like I said I was open to argument and discussion. If the experience players as a whole concede that the way the PMs were reported is allowable within the game I am good with that. I guess I was reading too much into nothing. This game does hype my paranoia level. UN-Vote Officer Lewis, Security Guard (jamesn)
  17. Section 5, sub paragraph 3, lines 14-18 of the Go-Team code of ethics specifically prohibit the publication of personal correspondence. Openly sharing that much PM information straight out doesn't sit well with me. Seems a scum move to use someones behind doors strategizing against them so openly. For that reason I am VOTING Officer Lewis, Security Guard (jamesn). If an argument can be made to sway my decision I am open to hearing it.
  18. Back to the PM side of things. How close are we allowed to come to breaking rule 5 with PM information? Asking since this is only my second game.
  19. Didn’t mean to be. I just don’t want to loose any loyal town players because they end up looking suspicious for using different terms. It’s Happened before.
  20. Not saying I am against pms. I’m saying getting a pm during day one is a bit suspect.
  21. We lost one of our own. These moles went straight for security, this CANNOT BE TOLERATED. WHAT is our NEXT MOVE? There is a whole lot of discussion about claiming and PMing. This was a serious issue in my last game as well. I think a lot more than is strickly needed is being taken into the terms being used. For sake of clarity, if you are claiming town, just claim town. It seems as if you are trying to trip people up and cause a lot more misdirected conversation by yelling IM LOYAL CTU. As far as the PMs go, I know I am ignoring anything I received before the first night was up. No one could know anything for sure outside of their own allegiance.
  22. *pulls his glasses down the bridge of his nose and glares over them* You are quick to point fingers my masked friend. *pushes them back up* The act of a Mole attempting to cast suspicion and deflect attention. A textbook ploy of a double agent. Vote: Zip (Mostlytechnic)
  23. I assure you sir, All moles found will be whacked with swift resolve and extreme prejudice.
  24. Fantastic build. I could also see this as an earth based creature without wings.
  25. Roger That White, spread out, investigate everyone.
×
×
  • Create New...