Lord Arjay

Vote: Havel Pavlov/ Sok117 It is possible that Petey and Mr Nowhere are sinister together, however I find it unlikely. Havel Pavlov was already suspicious to me (especially since he disapeared near the end of yesterday) so I have little reason to doubt his guilt. Obviously, if someone contradicts this story I'll remove my vote though I don't think that's going to happen. Also Petey, what made you choose to investigate Havel?

Very nice diorama Daver! The details on the rooftops are great and the smooth buildings look really good. I love the two stalls outside the most though. Looking forward to seeing more pictures on this.

Yes, somehow I was under the impression that not insane meant sinister aswell. I must have missed that earlier. Oops.

Perhaps I worded that badly. From what I gathered, when Martin investigated he either got back a result of insane or not insane - with not-insane meaning independents and sinisters. However, this other investigator apparently got back a result of sinister. I just found it slightly wierd that if the were both to investigate a sinister Martin would get back a result of not-insane but the other investigator would get back sinister.

Hmm. Jesus, were you told that Washing Bear and the King were sinister or not insane? It seems a little odd that two investigators would get different results.

Unvote: Nurse Pepper/BobtheCM I'm still not sure about her but real leads have surfaced so it would be pointless to continue with my vote. The evidence brought against the King seem pretty conclusive and if he turns out to be insane, then we have a good starting point for tommorow. This is definately the best option in my eyes. Vote: King of Delaware/KingoftheZempk Also, Nurse Penny continues to have no actual opinions. While it would be silly to pursue this today, it is important that we don't forget about her.

I'd say that it's more likely that a protector simply protects from death. You should reveal the info if you think it's helpful. Okay, now what are your opinions on: Sandy and Nurse Pendleton?

Wrong life book. I'm Timtam and you've not explained why I'm sinister, please do.

No, the point is that you are. These: Are all useless posts that do nothing. They don't offer any opinions at all. Not many people know anything but somehow they manage to tell us all who they suspect/trust. It's impossible to do anything wrong when you don't do anything at all.

Mmm, okay then. Unvote: Ted Tompkins/Whitefang I agree. Vote: Nurse Pepper/BobtheCM For being slightly more talkative, but still useless.

Hello, many people have already brought up ideas on who they think are sinister. This is the useless type of stuff I was talking about earlier. Also, instead of claiming that there's not enough evdence for anything (why do we even bother getting up in the morning ), why don't you tell us who you suspect? Or why you don't suspect the person being voted for? That's such a non-defence. "Sinister wouldn't want to stand out so since I stood out I can't be sinister" Using this logic, wouldn't a sinister not care about standing out because they know that they can fall back on your arguement if called out on it? I don't think Jesus is sinister, nor do I suspect Sandy enough to place a vote on him yet. Cat Manuel is also a non-entity but at least he did something on day one, I'd much rather vote for the waste of sinister space that is Ted. Vote: Ted Tompkins / Whitefang For being useless. My vote shall stay here until he gives an opinion on something or someone else does something that warrants a vote even more.

I love these micro-modulars. It's amazing how accurate you've managed to make these compared to the actual thing (Fire Brigade has to be my favourite). The vehicles on the road just make it complete. Great job!

The fact that you even consider voting for myself or my brother automatically invalidates everything. Ignoring that, it's a list of people who haven't said things repeatedly. Some of the people on the list are worth looking into that's true. However, others are not. There are plenty of people who have talked more but said less. Giving them a free pass simply because they can provide commentary on everything is silly. Still, since I do suspect a couple of people you've pointed out I'll play along. Well, it's useless just saying that. Who do you find most suspicious on that list right now? Why? As I said I think Ted Tompkins is the most suspicious out of those people because from my memory he never has anything worthwhile to say. He doesn't give his opinions on the main discussion points and generally he's even more non-existant than Shadows was. I thought so, I just wanted to make sure.

Not a good night for us. Sure, it could be worse (I could have been hurt!) but the fact remains that these independents still appear to be classed as insane so I'd assume that they would also stand in the way of the sinisters overpowering us. Oh, we also lost Martin - an investigator. Great. Who? There's not much use in keeping your thoughts to yourself, is there? True, though this also applies to Jesus given that protecting innocent insanes was one of the reasons his ability is apparently useful: So why is Martin dead? A few people are being suspiciously quiet. Most notable is Ted Tompkins, who doesn't appear to have anything to contribute when he does speak up. Anyway, I have nothing else to add in the way of information. Hopefully we actually make some progress in finding the sinister today.

Well, I still stand by my earlier views. I would have prefered that we discussed other options, instead of using this whole dilemma as an excuse to waste a day dealing with a neutral who has yet to cause any problems (I do see the arguement for voting him out, I'm just not happy with the way our main priority has been ignored). Aswell as the complete failure to make any progress in stopping the sinister we've also succeded in outing far more than was necessary, which has left us with no distinct advantage going into the night. There's no chance of anything other than a conviction of Shadows coming from today -I don't agree with convicting Martin at this point anyway- and my vote is not needed so I'll also abstain until tommorow.

I agree that Jesus' claim is likely true as if he was lying there were far easier and more plausible things he could clam. However, this does not mean that he is certainly innocent - I don't doubt that the sinister would find use meddling with innocent activities at night. For now though, I'm inclined to trust him due to his actions during the day. That doesn't make much sense to me. You're stressing the differance between these two things quite heavily in your arguement, which is a rather weak point. If anything, I'd say that those descriptions are the wrong way around. Except he's already admitted being neutral - sorry, independant so that scenario is extremly unlikely to happen. Anyway I'll hold my vote. Although Shadows may as well have been non-existant so far, I'd rather we try to find a sinister today instead of settling for someone who only has the potential to go bad. At the very least it would be nice to hear what Martin has to say about all this, since he's apparently heavily involved.

Voting has already started silly people. Anyway, while it's good that we appear to have not lost anyone during the night it's rather sad that we have lost an insane anyway in Big Cam. Luckily, myself and my brother have made it through the night without a scratch and since we are so great, that's something all you humans should be grateful for. Intresting but I'm not sure I follow. You've simply shown us a photo, which although means that Jesus was up and about at night I don't see how you then make the jump that he is sinister. Were you told that he is without a doubt sinister? Or just shown the photo? While both are suspicious, only the first is certain. I will wait and see Jesus' response to this before I place a vote.

Harm you or I? That's unthinkable! Why would such an inferior person wish to harm either of us. These lesser-developed people obviously have little concept of greatness. I happen to be one of those who recieved the bathroom message (rather early on in the day), which is why I voted Washing Bear. My experiance was much the same as what has already been described, and the note was written by Washing Bear himself, so no-one was trying to push a campaign to get him elected without his knowledge. I had no idea that others were contacted, nor why me in particular (byond the fact that I had not spken at the time). The note itself was not very convincing but it's far better than voting blindly for no tangible reason. Simply because you did not the bathroom message does not mean it did not exist.

Intresting that you should say this, given that you were the person who was moved. Unless my memory is incorrect this was announced earlier. You're essentially giving us a (rather flawed, as I don't think we can rule anyone out at this stage) reason to trust you and then asking someone else to point you out. Though I suppose you weren't aware of your self referance? Cat Manuel has also said nothing but no-one's mentioned him. Weird how people already both trust and suspect someone who hasn't opened their mouth. I agree that due to what's been mentioned there's likely a staff member involved but I don't think the reason given against Nurse Pendleton is very convincing.

Although not everyone has spoken, I have decided that the Chief is the best option for the job. Since I don't know how long it will be before more people speak I'll cast my vote now. Vote for PR: Washing Bear / JimButcher Big Cam (5; Big Cam, Sandy, ADHO15, sok117, Stash) Washing Bear (6; KingoftheZempk, JimButcher, Dragonator, Shadows, Roncanator, Lord Arjay) Mr. Nowhere (2; Rufus, Scouts) Jesus (2; iamded, Badboy) Ryan Catchers (2; Rick, TinyPiesRUs) Dudley Eisenhower (1; Mrlegoninja) Stanley Spussemmin (1: CorneliusMurdock)

Well, obviously any position of authority should be taken up by myself or my brother. That is quite clear, though given how difficult it has been to convince those who have a much smaller mental capacity of our greatness in the past I'm going to keep myself out of this. I'll keep my vote for now as I can't see much reason to trust anyone other than me. It's doubtful someone will emerge as spectacularly trustworthy in time given to vote but I'd like to wait until everyone has at least spoken up.

Hello all, you may call me TimTam. I am ready to start. Now, where's my brother gone?

Oh. I can't even remember how we came to that decision. If we had switched kills that night then all of us would have probably won. Still, with the amount of things going right something was bound to mess things up eventually. Here's my Role: I also inherited any abilities of dead family members. As you can see, I wasn't investigation immune which was annoying considering that the noodles survival rested on my converting ability. I hope that explains why there wasn't a convert nightly. The noodles were converted in this order: Night 1 - JimButcher Night 3 - Walter Kovacs Night 5 - Iamded Night 7 - Fugazi Night 9 - Roncanator Night 11 - ADHO Hewkii was the original vigilante, a role that passed onto Fugazi who then told Walter all about it. Biggest mistake for us was probably converting iamded (sorry) who turned out to be on Quarry's hit-list. That one was kind of a rush when we should have been prepared for the nights conversion. Apart from that our individual mistakes weren't big enough to be picked up on. We would have had it in the bag were it not for that traitor Fugazi! I'll give more in-depth thoughts later. Oh it did work. He did try and convince us to keep you around. We just didn't listen.

The new minifigures look great but I'm not too intrested in the card game so the set seems overpriced for me. Thanks for the review!

I can't believe no-one called me out on my lurking compared to my hyper-activeness during Hogwarts. I thought it would be obvious. Still, it was the most risk-free way to play the game for my role but I'll talk about that when the game was over. I knew it was a good idea to kill you.