Lord Arjay

I agree with this. Beatrice is pretty obviously either a vampire or has been brought back by scum. I doubt that a reviver would have more than one shot so I believe Mr Synclair when he says that he was the one who brought back Sebastien, unless anyone claims otherwise of course. Is "Little Bunny Foo Foo" the person who you were talking about when you said that you had confirmed a killer? I agree that it looks pretty suspicious (though I don't see how it would confirm them as a killer) but you haven't told us who they are.

I would have prefered him to answer first, though I suppose that makes sense.

I'd assume that if Quinn is the new owner of the pick axe and Harriet had found out then she would have told us. Although, I don't think anyone said they thought he was in possession of the pick axe (in fact Samuel thinks he is a vampire, not a Rogue) and I'm pretty sure most people are voting due to his inactivity - so why bring that up?

Vote: Quinn Synclair / Quarryman I may reconsder this vote depending on how the day progresses, though for now this does seem like our only option. There's not much against him besides the fact that he doesn't talk much but this is all we have to go on today. I'm willing to leave Charles alone if Harriet believes him.

Such as..? Zed claimed to have a night action, so I don't think tht should be proof of your innocence.

I never said that. While what you say could be true, you must appreciate that if I told you something in private and then completely contradicted it you'd be a bit sceptical, wouldn't you? Charles looks like he's flailing rather a lot, so I'm much more confident in his guilt. Though I'd assume Sebastien is sane, as Gary Coleman has already been revealed as insane. I doubt we'd have both an insane and a naive investigator. That and I know he was correct about me.

Oh, I see. And the reason you told me just yesterday that you didn't find him very suspicious is..? That said, it wouldn't be the first time you suddenly change your opinion for no apparent reason.

I would agree to voting out Charles, as he still remains suspicious to me. Do you think lynching Charles is the right thing to do? If you do then I don't really see the point in asking that question, besides making sure you were in the majority and didn't stand out.

Before Walter died he contacted a group of people (me included) and told us that he didn't think he was going to survive the night. He then claimed that he was Person Four from Harriet's plays and said he was afraid his identity had been revealed to another faction. So, it looks like Benjamin was correct that Walter did have a night action, which makes me slightly worried about how he knew.

Instead of waiting for Stevie to read every page in the slowest possible manner, I'd like to take the diary from him and read all pages starting from October 1st 1952. I shall then go through to Ackerson's residence and quickly look at the book for any oddities.

Vampires are on the side of the town until they are attacked in the night, at which point they become a vampire and begin to work against us. So if Beatrice returns we should vote her out sharpish. If she does not then we have nothing to worry about.

No, it is not. I'll quickly check to see if any of the ingredients stand out as having a foriegn name. Then I'll switch the lamp on and off and see if anything useful happens.

I'm a little late but I'd like to add my congratulations to yourself and your family.

This is a good point. In case you wanted me to comment on it to clarify, I can say that Sebastien has not contacted me at any point in this ordeal.

Nice idea for using the Gorilla suit. Despite the size of the vig, you have still managed to create a fairly detailed scene, which doesn't distract from the main focus. Great job!

Vote: Sebastien Vaughn / Shadows "Gary Coleman" has claimed that Sebastien is not a villager, therefore I think this is the best way of finding out what's going on. Is this correct? Harriet's play indicates that someone had already claimed to be the inventor to you. I would assume that if there is a scum framer, there would be villagers with a much higher priority for framing. Sebastien hasn't really had any attention on him so far. It's possible of course but there is no need to completely disregard all investigations based upon a possibility. Harriet, what kind of result did "Gary Coleman" get on night one. I'm not intrested in hearing who he targeted just what result he got. I don't think you mentioned this anywhere. This could rule out the possibility of someone claiming to be paraniod. My vote is in no way set in stone and may change depending on what happens. However I currently think this is the best move and so shall leave my vote where it is for now.

There is almost certainly another scum faction, whether they are vampires or not doesn't really seem important. There is too much in favour of this theory so I'm going to believe it for now. Except we can't even trust those people, as there are numerous ways that an investigator can find a scum innocent. You should know this. I do not see the benefit of knowing investigation results for someone unless they are under suspicion. Charles continues to be the most suspicious (he didn't respond to Harriet's accusation against him yesterday) even with this solo-werewolf idea. He's probably the best way to test what people are saying aswell and unless Harriet has anything new to be revealed, he will be getting my vote later.

I shall look inside the jacket pockets for anything of interest and read any notes that I may find. I'll then look inside the kitchen cupboards.

Very nice MOC puriri! The slope is nicely made and the buildings are all great. I particularly like the Asian themed and the yellow one, though they all look good together and help make the scene. I love the small police car!

With applesauce?

While that's true, it's pretty clear she was talking to Mr Lyons not Mr Greyson.

I'm a little late but I agree with the majority so far. Vote: Adam Sokern / Sok117 I find Mr Synclair suspicious as well, though Adam's actions yesterday make him pretty likely to be a werewolf.

I shall look in the crates outside. Then I'll follow Mr Jefferson inside.

Your defence was already suspicious but yes, it would be less suspicious if you didn't suddenly change your view and completely contradict your previous stance without reason. It had already been brought up that punishments may happen if we didn't convict but that didn't bother you before.

No. He was already going to die so your vote wasn't needed for anything but to signify that you agreed with voting him out, which you didn't. You didn't think he was a villager but were suprised he was a werewolf?!