metaltiger87

Eurobricks New Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About metaltiger87

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

370 profile views
  1. that is probably the only advantage of having this type of gearbox but i like it more if you have 1 lever for the direction and other levers for the function its just a lot of gears just to move and reverse 1 function b.t.w. an interesting idea for a alternate c-model would be a manitou just editing the super structure should not be so hard, i mean the base of the model is a perfect starting point
  2. wel it might save some space cause you dont have to put a second motor is and there wont have to be to motors running at the same time second point you dont have to put a motor in the attachment but i think at least the second output is a good idea but thats my opinion
  3. Hey guys What do you think about a secondary output for the atachments 1 motorized like it is all ready And a second one driven from the drive shaft So one output will allways be driven when the truck is in motion Optional is a clucht to disengage the drive so you have 2 controllable outputs for the attachment when stationairy What do you guys think?
  4. I hope this adds a photo If people like it i can try making a model in ldd But it wil be my first model Some side info 1 motor drives al funtions The switches control the different functions So bij turning the motor left or right you control the directions of the arm and rotation of the crane I only need to make the gripper
  5. Hey im new to I like your outrigger idea Myself am working on a double extendable outrigger but its stil very hard to make I get a lot of inspiration here B.t.w. im from the netherlands So my english is not so great