DC Superheroes 2025 - Rumors & Discussion

[BrickBob Studpants]

5 minutes ago, BatDeanj said:

Do we know if Arkham is selling well? Can we expect more DC modulars?

We don’t and never will, as TLG don’t reveal sales figures for individual themes, let alone specific sets. Anecdotal evidence exists but is highly unreliable. It’s possible we might see another one at some point, but I guess 2026 will be Marvel’s turn again

[Renny The Spaceman]

2 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

We don’t and never will, as TLG don’t reveal sales figures for individual themes, let alone specific sets. Anecdotal evidence exists but is highly unreliable. It’s possible we might see another one at some point, but I guess 2026 will be Marvel’s turn again

 Not iron clad but how long a set remains in production can help paint a broad picture. Most sets are kept in production for like a year or two, if it stays notably longer it's probably doing well or being kept on shelves because it ties into something.

[psqidexslizer]

3 hours ago, BatDeanj said:

Do we know if Arkham is selling well? Can we expect more DC modulars?

IMO, whether or not we get more DC modulars depends on that state of DC as a franchise more than whether or not Arkham sells well. If the DCU is successful enough, I could see Lego making a Daily Planet or Hall of Justice to tie-in. Maybe even LexCorp and a Flash Museum. If Batman remains popular, we could see Wayne Tower, Wayne Manor, and GCPD. If DC falls off even more than it has in the past decade, I doubt the theme will even survive much longer.

On 11/11/2025 at 9:55 AM, Mandalorianknight said:

I think this is a bit of a certified Aslume take. We can argue the specifics of however much superman actually made (At the end of the day, even with generous estimates on profit-sharing with theatres, it wasn't a smash-hit success. And last I heard it was having a rough time on streaming), or whether or not a Jimmy Olsen TV show is a good idea that will get the kids hyped, but as it relates to lego I'm not sure how much either of those actually matter.

Lego's continually moving to more and more of an adult market not just in DC, but across the board. Even the marvel line now features cheap(ish), system, minifigure sets that are clearly aimed at adults. 

Lego's also, whether it's in DC, Marvel, or Star Wars, increasingly been moving away from big waves for the new content to focusing on older hits. That's again not just for Batman.

Superman becoming more popular than Batman at all seems unlikely to me, especially considering regardless of which is kid-friendlier, there are two batman movies and a robin(s) movie(?) in development so I'd expect Lego would rather go with their favored character who they see as more of a proven success.

That’s a fair point about Lego increasingly aiming content at adults and giving us less for recent releases. But, with Super Heroes in particular, that seems to be a result of the MCU losing momentum and the DCEU collapsing in on itself like a dying star.

I think it is worth noting that the one character who continuously gets sets aimed at a younger audience is Spider-Man. Sure, he seems to only be getting two sets directly tying into his new movie. But we got a wave of comic-based sets last summer. We got another wave coming this January. All aimed at a younger demographic. I’d argue this is because Spider-Man is obviously popular with a younger demographic, and always has been. But it helps that he’s had family friendly content continuously coming out for the past two decades that includes movies, cartoons, animated movies, etc.

Batman was in a similar situation only five years ago where we were constantly getting sets for him aimed at a younger demographic. That has all but ended. Why is this? I’d argue it’s a direct result of his content increasingly being aimed at older audiences. When was the last Batman cartoon made aimed at younger audiences? 2014? And that’s why Lego has shifted towards the adult market for Batman because his content is aimed at older audiences and his older content remains popular, but isn’t as known by younger audiences.

Superman is in a position where he’s not as popular as Batman, but he has content being aimed at younger audiences which could help boost his popularity with them. To your point, Batman has two projects that may be aimed at younger audiences coming out, but one is puppet animation which isn’t popular with anyone and the other is a movie that has been in development hell for a while and who knows when it will come out and what it will be rated.

I think we will see a shift in Superman’s popularity happen (arguably, it is already underway) and Lego will want to cash in. Will he get the Spider-Man treatment? Certainly not to the same magnitude, but I could see him getting smaller comic waves, a couple of movie sets, and potentially eclipsing Batman in terms of set output if the conditions are right.

Edited November 12, 2025 by psqidexslizer

[Mandalorianknight]

10 hours ago, calebcold3 said:

I just hope the main villain of the film is Braniac, as One of the reasons why the MoT announcement got me pumped was the potential of seeing Lex and Supes putting aside differences to take down Brainiac in his potential big screen debut. But something tells me that the main villain is going to be Rick Flagg Sr, given how Peacemaker 2 ended and how the last episode of Peacemaker 2 was apparently a commercial for MoT, AND how Gunn has been trying to make Flagg Sr. a "thing", but Flagg Sr. is just not working IMO.

Never understood why they're pushing so hard with Waller, Flag, Gunn's wife, and the rest of those characters. Focus on the superheroes. It seems like such an obvious way to have your projects do better.

4 hours ago, BatDeanj said:

Do we know if Arkham is selling well? Can we expect more DC modulars?

We won't know yet, and because it's a D2C even anecdotal evidence will be harder to get. We can estimate a bit based on sales or if it's retirement date gets pushed back, but at the end of the day we won't know exactly how well. 2027 would also be the earliest we could see another DC modular, and only if Arkham does very well. Even if they're starting to get promising sales data for Arkham, the 2026 modular has probably already been planned and partially designed (and I'd guess it's oscorp).

8 hours ago, DaredevilFan said:

Considering how Superman performed better than The Marvels, Cap 4 and F4, all of which got at least a set. Coupled with the general positive reviews, trends and memes which came from it. I think it would be a safe bet for LEGO to make 1 £30-£50 set for it. But then again I thought Superman would at least get something 😂 The DCEU sets must have really sold awfully for LEGO to be this cautious about DC movie sets. 
It’ll be interesting to see how many Batman: Part 2 sets we get. I could see us just getting a new Batmobile with main villain ( or maybe not even that) r 

You have to remember that Lego doesn't know whether or not a movie is going to do better than another movie when they decide to make a set, that they've been skimping or outright skipping some MCU movies, and that the MCU's always gotten more set coverage than new-release DC movies.

1 hour ago, psqidexslizer said:

Batman was in a similar situation only five years ago where we were constantly getting sets for him aimed at a younger demographic. That has all but ended. Why is this? I’d argue it’s a direct result of his content increasingly being aimed at older audiences. When was the last Batman cartoon made aimed at younger audiences? 2014? And that’s why Lego has shifted towards the adult market for Batman because his content is aimed at older audiences and his older content remains popular, but isn’t as known by younger audiences.

Superman is in a position where he’s not as popular as Batman, but he has content being aimed at younger audiences which could help boost his popularity with them. To your point, Batman has two projects that may be aimed at younger audiences coming out, but one is puppet animation which isn’t popular with anyone and the other is a movie that has been in development hell for a while and who knows when it will come out and what it will be rated.

I think we will see a shift in Superman’s popularity happen (arguably, it is already underway) and Lego will want to cash in. Will he get the Spider-Man treatment? Certainly not to the same magnitude, but I could see him getting smaller comic waves, a couple of movie sets, and potentially eclipsing Batman in terms of set output if the conditions are right.

The timeline doesn't quite match up though. The last batman cartoon (it depends on where you want to draw the line- do we want to count the 2018 Youtube Justice League shorts? You draw it at Beware the Batman, which I'd be amenable to, but it's important to throw on the asterisk that the second half of that season released on Adult Swim. Would TBATB be the last true batman cartoon for kids?) was, by your estimate, a good six years before we stopped getting slogs of comic batman sets for kids, and while you could say that the 2019 or 2020 sets may have had poor sales, I don't think we can say they were riding that high of BTB all the way to 2018/19, or that they spent the better part of a decade making comic sets that didn't sell well.

The other thing is that being "not as popular as batman but having content aimed at younger audiences" falls apart as a rationale for lego to make more sets when you consider Teen Titans. Aimed at kids significantly more than most recent superman outings (which, as a side note, I really don't think Superman 2025 was aimed at kids any more than your average MCU movie or about half the DCEU movies, and if I remember right MAWS is another Adult Swim cartoon), assumably pretty popular given it's the longest-running animated series in DC history, and yet it's only gotten a couple dimensions tie-ins. I believe there was also a batmobile preschool cartoon recently that didn't receive any set coverage.

Batman's movies have been about the same level of kid-unfriendliness since 2005, but we were always much more likely to get tie-ins to whatever the new batman movie was than the cartoon out at the time, because unless it's rated R there's still going to be a billion kids going to see those movies. You look at TTG, or Shazam, or even Superman 2025, and batman always gets more set coverage, because at the end of the day Batman and Spider-Man are the two most popular superheroes. Superman's lagged behind them for a long time, and at this point, even with the new movie, I don't even think you can say he's the default #3 anymore.

As nice as it would be to get something other than batmobiles, there's just really no position for it.

Edited November 12, 2025 by Mandalorianknight

[psqidexslizer]

2 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

The timeline doesn't quite match up though. The last batman cartoon (it depends on where you want to draw the line- do we want to count the 2018 Youtube Justice League shorts? You draw it at Beware the Batman, which I'd be amenable to, but it's important to throw on the asterisk that the second half of that season released on Adult Swim. Would TBATB be the last true batman cartoon for kids?) was, by your estimate, a good six years before we stopped getting slogs of comic batman sets for kids, and while you could say that the 2019 or 2020 sets may have had poor sales, I don't think we can say they were riding that high of BTB all the way to 2018/19, or that they spent the better part of a decade making comic sets that didn't sell well.

The other thing is that being "not as popular as batman but having content aimed at younger audiences" falls apart as a rationale for lego to make more sets when you consider Teen Titans. Aimed at kids significantly more than most recent superman outings (which, as a side note, I really don't think Superman 2025 was aimed at kids any more than your average MCU movie or about half the DCEU movies, and if I remember right MAWS is another Adult Swim cartoon), assumably pretty popular given it's the longest-running animated series in DC history, and yet it's only gotten a couple dimensions tie-ins. I believe there was also a batmobile preschool cartoon recently that didn't receive any set coverage.

Batman's movies have been about the same level of kid-unfriendliness since 2005, but we were always much more likely to get tie-ins to whatever the new batman movie was than the cartoon out at the time, because unless it's rated R there's still going to be a billion kids going to see those movies. You look at TTG, or Shazam, or even Superman 2025, and batman always gets more set coverage, because at the end of the day Batman and Spider-Man are the two most popular superheroes. Superman's lagged behind them for a long time, and at this point, even with the new movie, I don't even think you can say he's the default #3 anymore.

As nice as it would be to get something other than batmobiles, there's just really no position for it.

I don’t think you quite understand my argument. It isn’t that Lego is going to cash in when DC creates content that is aimed at kids (and by kids, I mean 8-14 year olds, which are Lego’s target age group). Rather, I’m saying that Lego is going to cash in on things that kids recognize and things that are popular with them. So, of course, the timeline for different shows like BtB (which didn’t seem to be popular anyways) or movies like TDK aren’t going to line up with when we get Batman sets. But how people, specifically kids and parents, perceive Batman does depend on the content that is being out.

You go back to the early 2010’s and we were coming off of TDKT, which were insanely popular and aimed at the older side of Lego’s audience (or even older, making them “cool” to people in Lego’s target audience). This helped promote the Batman brand with Lego’s target audience, allowing Lego to sell sets that weren’t specifically based on TDKT (before 2020, we only got 1 set based on those films) but were Batman themed. But, as time went on, other things (namely the MCU) became popular. The Lego Movie and The Lego Batman Movie did help Batman stay popular a while longer, but by 2020 we had gone multiple years without a Batman movie, the R-Rated Joker had just come, and Batman had waned slightly in popularity and began to become associated less with the 12-14 age group and more the 16+ age group. The Batman came out, and although it was also PG-13, it was a moodier, darker film less focused on action and more in the style of David Fincher films. IMO, that helped seal the deal that Batman was for a more mature audience than the 12-14 year olds Lego was targeting. Which is why we’ve been seeing Batman sets aimed almost exclusively at adults since then.

Teen Titans Go, as much as I think Lego should have capitalized it, has the opposite problem. It was aimed at a younger audience than Lego targets, making them appear childish and uncool. It also doesn’t help that Lego rarely makes sets on cartoon series, and even then it’s only Spider-Man and sets aimed at fans of older cartoons like BtAS and X-Men ‘97.

But how does this tie to my larger point about Superman? Superman, like Batman and Spider-Man, is one of those superheroes that everyone and their grandmother recognizes. But, unlike those other two, he hasn’t managed to achieve the same level of popularity, especially not in the past few decades. However, I think the latest movie has started to turn things around. The Superman brand should be getting additionally boosts these next two years with Supergirl and Man of Tomorrow releasing in July of both years. I think this could help push the Superman brand enough for Lego to capitalize on it again (the mech this years shows they’re at least testing the waters for more Superman sets) in the same way they once capitalized on Batman and currently capitalize on Spider-Man, although obviously on a much smaller scale (think 1-3 sets instead of 6-7 sets per year). I think it’s clear Batman sets are aimed at adults and I don’t see anything on the horizon that will help push him to the forefront again among 12-14 year olds. Thus, I think the number of Batman sets will remain stagnant while the number of Superman sets has the potential to increase significantly. I think we may find ourselves in a situation where Superman becomes more popular with LEGO’s target group while Batman becomes less, possibly even leading to more Superman sets than Batman sets.

Obviously, this is going to depend a great deal on how the DCU continues to perform and whether Lego continues to target the same age group, and even if their internal data shows interest in Superman sets is there. But I don’t think the idea is as far fetched as it first appears.

Edited November 12, 2025 by psqidexslizer

[calebcold3]

Brainiac is the main villain of MoT! 

My prayers have been answered, so here's hoping he's a minifigure if we get ONE singular MoT set 

 

[DaredevilFan]

Come on LEGO one set with Superman, Lex and Brainiac 🤞🏻 

[psqidexslizer]

10 hours ago, calebcold3 said:

Brainiac is the main villain of MoT! 

My prayers have been answered, so here's hoping he's a minifigure if we get ONE singular MoT set 

 

Yeah, it seemed pretty obvious from the initial announcement this would be the case.

I’d be shocked if we didn’t get a set this go around, but regardless, Brainiac being featured in a movie (and characters like Sinestro, Grodd, and Green Lantern getting more exposure) is a good thing for those of us who want more than just Batman from this theme (which I think is everyone but our slow, shelled friend).

I am curious what Brainiac is going to look like. Comicwise, his look has ranged from big-brained-Terminator to Flanders-top/stripper-bottom, so there’s a lot of ways his design could go. 

[CloneCommando99]

Apparently a casting call for a new female hero in MoT has been released. The description is a warrior in her late 20s.

Many are speculating that she’ll be either of: Wonder Woman, Big Barda or Starfire.

 

Either way, I can’t wait for Lego to not make a minifigure.

 

By the sounds of things Man of Tomorrow might end up being a team up film. Which I’d not be opposed to tbh. The DCU by that point will have become more fleshed out than the MCU was when Avengers released. Let alone the DCEU was when Justice League released, and it’s still likely a Superman film at heart.

So far we’ve potentially got: Superman, Lex Luthor, Green Lantern (Guy Gardner), Hawkgirl, Mr Terrifc, Metamorpho and whoever the new female hero is. And that’s not even considering how Supergirl and Green Lantern (John Stewart) are also likely and that the Justice Gang will definitely be larger the next time we see them as they were recruiting in Peacemaker S2 (Blue Beetle, Booster Gold, Black Canary and Captain Atom are all possible if Gunn continues with his JLI inspiration)

 

I also predict that Braniac will have captured Ultraman, leading him to find out about Superman and Earth’s existence, and convert him into Cyborg Superman.

[BrickBob Studpants]

13 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

I also predict that Braniac will have captured Ultraman, leading him to find out about Superman and Earth’s existence, and convert him into Cyborg Superman.

Ohhhh, I like that idea much more than Ultraman coming back as Bizarro!

MoT has a lot of potential, even though I still find the idea of Lex becoming a protagonist rather iffy after everything he did in Superman. Why would anyone trust him after that?

[Mandalorianknight]

8 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

MoT has a lot of potential, even though I still find the idea of Lex becoming a protagonist rather iffy after everything he did in Superman. Why would anyone trust him after that?

They needed to make him more reasonable in Superman2025. There's definitely a way to make "guy is suspicious of the infinitely powerful alien who could destroy all of human civilization in an afternoon" lead to a more understandable antagonist, or even going the personal angle where Lex has had to fight for everything he has and views superman being born with this godlike power as cheating at life (You'd also probably want to make it so superman doesn't get curbstomped as much in the earlier fights if you're going the latter route). Especially with Gunn for whatever reason deciding to make it so superman's parents DID send him to take over. If Lex found that in a less cartoonishly evil manner and was more legitimately concerned about humanity than "envy is a calling", and spent the rest of the film fighting superman because he thought Kal-el was going to fulfill his mission, you could easily have him set up as a believable protagonist in MoT. Or at least one who we aren't all immediately certain is going to betray superman in the film.

As-is, self-aggrandized jealously and... aiding an invasion to get a tax-haven micronation (why is this the second time in a year that a superhero project's given a sometimes-nuanced character a cartoonish scheme to create their own Petoria?) don't really lead to much sympathy from the audience or want to see the character as a protagonist.

[psqidexslizer]

10 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

They needed to make him more reasonable in Superman2025. There's definitely a way to make "guy is suspicious of the infinitely powerful alien who could destroy all of human civilization in an afternoon" lead to a more understandable antagonist, or even going the personal angle where Lex has had to fight for everything he has and views superman being born with this godlike power as cheating at life (You'd also probably want to make it so superman doesn't get curbstomped as much in the earlier fights if you're going the latter route). Especially with Gunn for whatever reason deciding to make it so superman's parents DID send him to take over. If Lex found that in a less cartoonishly evil manner and was more legitimately concerned about humanity than "envy is a calling", and spent the rest of the film fighting superman because he thought Kal-el was going to fulfill his mission, you could easily have him set up as a believable protagonist in MoT. Or at least one who we aren't all immediately certain is going to betray superman in the film.

As-is, self-aggrandized jealously and... aiding an invasion to get a tax-haven micronation (why is this the second time in a year that a superhero project's given a sometimes-nuanced character a cartoonish scheme to create their own Petoria?) don't really lead to much sympathy from the audience or want to see the character as a protagonist.

In all fairness, this is the same director who took Peacemaker, made him an unlikable jerk, had him kill one of the most-likable most-morally-good characters on the team, had him attempt to kill the other most-likable most-morally-good character, all in an attempt to cover up the horrible abuses of the US government and then gave him him his own spinoff show where he fleshed the character out, gave him a path towards redemption and turned him from a completely hatable character into a very likable but flawed character. So it’s not like he hasn’t done this same exact thing already (honestly, you could probably argue that he’s done it with just about every movie he’s made, but I think Peacemaker is the most apparent example).

[Mandalorianknight]

16 minutes ago, psqidexslizer said:

In all fairness, this is the same director who took Peacemaker, made him an unlikable jerk, had him kill one of the most-likable most-morally-good characters on the team, had him attempt to kill the other most-likable most-morally-good character, all in an attempt to cover up the horrible abuses of the US government and then gave him him his own spinoff show where he fleshed the character out, gave him a path towards redemption and turned him from a completely hatable character into a very likable but flawed character. So it’s not like he hasn’t done this same exact thing already (honestly, you could probably argue that he’s done it with just about every movie he’s made, but I think Peacemaker is the most apparent example).

The difference being peacemaker got a full TV show to redeem himself whereas Lex will be, at best, the deurontagonist in what's shaping up to be a proto-avengers scale movie wherein he will also most likely betray superman before the credits roll. (And also, while peacemaker was waller's stooge and an antagonist by the end of the movie, he's definitely "one of the squad" for much of it, and importantly for his redemption, is both a comedic character and a loser.)

[G_Brickley]

So it looks like lego_minecraft_goat on Instagram just teased a Daily Planet modular?!?

They’ve posted an image of their Minecraft build of Arkham Asylum (which was used to tease the Arkham modular) next to a build of a white tower with a gold globe on top.

Could be nothing, but it looks like there’s a chance!

[CloneCommando99]

Just now, G_Brickley said:

So it looks like lego_minecraft_goat on Instagram just teased a Daily Planet modular?!?

They’ve posted an image of their Minecraft build of Arkham Asylum (which was used to tease the Arkham modular) next to a build of a white tower with a gold globe on top.

Could be nothing, but it looks like there’s a chance!

That’s for the new shopping street Modular.

Unfortunately 

[G_Brickley]

12 minutes ago, CloneCommando99 said:

That’s for the new shopping street Modular.

Unfortunately 

Ahhhh that does unfortunately make more sense

ah well, it looks like an interesting build for modular fans at least. Sorry if I got any hopes up there 

[Toast]

I feel as if every year the modular has some similarities with the other modulars including Ninjago.  Daily Bugle was art deco architecture with a green newspaper stand while the police station was also art deco and a green newspaper stand.  Sanctum was a corner with a green roof and tan walls, same as Boutique Hotel.  Avengers Tower is a bit of an outlier, although the Jazz Club modular was originally slated to be a newspaper building so there may have been something similar originally.  The next year the Natural History Museum not only shared similar architecture to the X-Mansion, but was on 1.5 baseplates.  When the switch was made to DC for the Super Hero Modular buildings they continued the theme of a corner building every three years and made the ability to make it an inverted corner like the Ninjago modular building.

If my observations are correct and not purely coincidental I'm guessing that next years Super Heroes Modular will match this years modular with a golden sphere on top of the main building.  This prediction is paired with the rumor/leak of a previous Lego employee stating that the Lego Super Heroes team had developed a Daily Planet but decided to shelf the idea to instead release the Arkham Asylum due to the fact Batman sells better and it was the year of corner modular.

Maybe I'm crazy and incredibly hopeful, but I think we can bet on a Daily Planet modular next year! Who's with me!?

[BrickBob Studpants]

5 hours ago, Toast said:

Who's with me!?

 

 

[psqidexslizer]

15 hours ago, Toast said:

Who's with me!?

 

[CloneCommando99]

Thoughts on the Netflix acquisition?

 

And how will this impact Lego?

Here’s the outcomes I can think of:

Positive scenario: if Lanterns, Booster Gold and Jimmy Olsen go straight to Netflix they may become more popular and recognised than they would have been on HBO. This could lead to sets based specifically off those shows like we saw with One Piece and Stranger Things.

Negative Scenario 1: Netflix changes direction at DC again and focuses exclusively on Man.

Negative Scenario 2: this fails and DC will completely collapse 

Negative Scenario 3 (the Syndercult outcome): Netflix scraps DCU and continues Snyderverse. Meaning no DC sets based off R rated, character assassinating movies. (This seems the most unlikely if you’re a sane person who understands box office and the need for toy sales)

Did I miss any?

Also who is Netflix going to mandate that Milly Bobby Brown be cast as in the DCU? 

 

Edited December 5, 2025 by CloneCommando99

[psqidexslizer]

2 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

Thoughts on the Netflix acquisition?

 

And how will this impact Lego?

Here’s the outcomes I can think of:

Positive scenario: if Lanterns, Booster Gold and Jimmy Olsen go straight to Netflix they may become more popular and recognised than they would have been on HBO. This could lead to sets based specifically off those shows like we saw with One Piece and Stranger Things.

Negative Scenario 1: Netflix changes direction at DC again and focuses exclusively on Man.

Negative Scenario 2: this fails and DC will completely collapse 

Negative Scenario 3 (the Syndercult outcome): Netflix scraps DCU and continues Snyderverse. Meaning no DC sets based off R rated, character assassinating movies. (This seems the most unlikely if you’re a sane person who understands box office and the need for toy sales)

Did I miss any?

Also who is Netflix going to mandate that Milly Bobby Brown be cast as in the DCU? 

 

Lego will not be impacted. We will continue to get Batmobiles and nothing else. 

[calebcold3]

From what I've seen and read, the Netflix WB buy won't be into full affect for 2-3 years from now. It has to go through lots of approval. 

Anyways, when are we going to see pictures of the LEGO Bruce Wayne and Batsuit polybag? I'm very curious to see what it looks like, as I might pick it up if it looks good. 

We should also expect to see leaks/set names about whatever other 2026 sets we'll be getting in the summer (if we get any) soon within the next month or two. I feel like we're only going to get one other set, and that it will be another Batman Mech (this time, it's grey) with a Joker minifigure for it to fight.  

[Renny The Spaceman]

I don't think this'll affect LEGO at all, they have had a good relationship with WB and Netflix, this'll be atrocious for cinema as an artform though

[Mandalorianknight]

On 12/5/2025 at 3:10 PM, psqidexslizer said:

Lego will not be impacted. We will continue to get Batmobiles and nothing else. 

Yeah, this means literally nothing for lego regardless of what it means for the DCU. They haven't tied much into recent material (besides batman) since 2020.

Edited December 6, 2025 by Mandalorianknight

[CloneCommando99]

Supergirl’s marketing is so far so good. I’m excited for the trailer tomorrow.

It’d admittedly be a fair move by Lego to not make sets based off a movie that has a depressed and alcoholic protagonist tbh.

Edited December 10, 2025 by CloneCommando99