Harry Potter 2018 - Rumors & Discussion

[harleydavid98]

Just now, Kevii23 said:

He looks pretty good. Excited to see that FB set.

Same, now that we know we’re getting Jacob we’ve gotta get Queenie

[Hoth Rebel]

You would think so. If the suitcase set is the rumored 30€ price then you would get at least 3 new figures (I know Tina and Newt are in the Dimensions set, but Newt is still kinda expensive) and Niffler. That's enough for me to buy it so if there are more figures/beast in it, it's only a bonus. 

[Falconfan1414]

So newt, Jacob, Tina, and niffler are confirmed for the suitcase and queenie and young dumbledore are rumored for the suitcase 

[harleydavid98]

Just now, Kevii23 said:

You would think so. If the suitcase set is the rumored 30€ price then you would get at least 3 new figures (I know Tina and Newt are in the Dimensions set, but Newt is still kinda expensive) and Niffler. That's enough for me to buy it so if there are more figures/beast in it, it's only a bonus. 

Tina and Newt are both different from their Dimensions variants, however I’m still hoping we get Queenie (one of my favourite characters)

Queenie has also been Leaked!!

[Hoth Rebel]

I know they are different, it's more that they are not new characters. 

Queenie looks good, the leg printing is a little bit off, but it's better than just plain legs. 

[harleydavid98]

Just now, Kevii23 said:

I know they are different, it's more that they are not new characters. 

Queenie looks good, the leg printing is a little bit off, but it's better than just plain legs. 

I think the leg printing looks fine, but the shoe printing looks odd

[MAB]

16 hours ago, harleydavid98 said:

Clearly I was wrong, Jesus you have an answer for everything don’t you... ever thought that not everything needs your input ??‍♂️

 

I’m really not insecure, I’m just fed up of this guy replying to EVERYTHING that I put on

2

1

Have you ever thought that not everything needs your input? You accused someone else of being wrong as you had seen high resolution images of the box art (that you were not sharing) that proved you were right. If you are claiming other people are wrong with no evidence, then yes, it should be corrected. Stop making stuff up claiming you have other knowledge, when clearly you don't. False rumours should be pointed out.

 

Edited May 27, 2018 by MAB

[harleydavid98]

2 minutes ago, MAB said:

Have you ever thought that? You accused someone else of being wrong as you had seen high resolution images of the box art (that you were not sharing) that proved you were right. If you are claiming other people are wrong with no evidence, then yes, it should be corrected.

 

I was already proven wrong, there was literally no need for you to say anything, but as has been said earlier... drop it

[deskp]

FB 1 figures is great news.

But queenie have 2 weird expression and no normal one. That's terrible.

[harleydavid98]

Just now, deskp said:

FB 1 figures is great news.

But queenie have 2 weird expression and no normal one. That's terrible.

Yay someone agrees with me (from Discord) ?, I think the smiling face is perfect but the worried face isn’t really needed

[TheBrickBuilder14]

Ah, I was so hoping for a Percival Graves figure but since we now have 4 FB figures already I guess the odds of that happening are pretty low :(

[KevinMD]

I don’t like wasting one print on Jake for that stupid chin strap. Guess a flying scene or something plays a big part with him.  Don’t understand no normal queenie face but glad to get the fig.

 

[harleydavid98]

Just now, KevinMD said:

I don’t like wasting one print on Jake for that stupid chin strap. Guess a flying scene or something plays a big part with him.  Don’t understand no normal queenie face but glad to get the fig.

 

It’s from the first film when Newt uses Jacob as bait to catch the Erumpent

[Robert8]

I guess Queenie is the character with pink outfit, right? 

I thought that was Umbridge 

 

I haven't watched FB

Edited May 27, 2018 by Robert8

[harleydavid98]

7 minutes ago, Robert8 said:

I guess Queenie is the character with pink outfit, right? 

I thought that was Umbridge 

 

I haven't watched FB

Yeah, pink outfit massive grin is Queenie

[strangely]

The leg/foot printing is strange. It almost looks like it was designed for dual molded legs and then last minute they switched to regular legs. It looks like she's wearing black sandals with pink socks...

The lack of a normal facial expression is perplexing as well. There's a lot of weird design decisions to unpack here. The torso and hair looks good though, at least we have those.

[Roebuck]

1 hour ago, Robert8 said:

thought that was Umbridge 

Shame on you! Confusing one of the most adorable characters in the hole wizarding world with one of the definitely worst By the way you should see the movie

Great to get them confirmed, I was expecting those 4 in the suitcase set, unless there are another set I do not think we will get more FB figs this round (if course some may turn up in the cmfs) so young Dumbledore was probably another false rumour..

Apart from the niffler, I assume the rest of the beasts are brick built in the set.. I really hope we get several animals in the CMF

[doclord]

I don't think you can make a completely brickbuilt Erumpent, I'm hoping for a molded head at least.

[harleydavid98]

4 minutes ago, Roebuck said:

Shame on you! Confusing one of the most adorable characters in the hole wizarding world with one of the definitely worst By the way you should see the movie

Great to get them confirmed, I was expecting those 4 in the suitcase set, unless there are another set I do not think we will get more FB figs this round (if course some may turn up in the cmfs) so young Dumbledore was probably another false rumour..

Apart from the niffler, I assume the rest of the beasts are brick built in the set.. I really hope we get several animals in the CMF

I’m thinking these 4 will be in the case and then YAD will be the variant of AD in the CMF, I’m hoping that’s the case anyway

[joeee]

On 5/26/2018 at 7:15 AM, 8BrickMario said:

I wonder if a new Hagrid's Hut set would be based on the two-room design from PoA onward, as we haven't seen that version before. 

Because of the amount of attention to the archiecture detailing they gave to the Great Hall (I do not know what it is called but how outside the GH, they replicated the extra awning), and giving us all House Quidditch stands plus a whole section for the hoops. All of this is giving me a feeling they might try to achieve a two house hut because they seem to really be pushing for "make as archiectually accurate to the movies as possible".

 

The revivial this time has gotten me so excited!

[Roebuck]

6 minutes ago, doclord said:

I don't think you can make a completely brickbuilt Erumpent, I'm hoping for a molded head at least.

You can make everything with Lego, but animals definitely look better moulded.. The price compared to the number of bricks are so cheep, so I do not expect to many fancy moulds in the set, but they may surprise us

[8BrickMario]

Queenie looks great and Jacob is spot-on. I need to rewatch the film now.

[kevkipo]

They look great! I'm curious if Newt will have a new hair mold?

[harleydavid98]

Just now, kevkipo said:

They look great! I'm curious if Newt will have a new hair mold?

Nah, it’s the same as the Dimensions figure’s hair

[THELEGOBATMAN]

Jacob is amazing. Hairpiece and head is fantastic. Torso is great. Looking at the character in the film, he doesn't need leg printing, but looking at an actual minifgure, he needs it. Even not really detailed one.

Quennie is... good. Hairpiece and torso are perfect, but... well, there is no normal facial expression one looks kinda scared and terrified, and the other one looks like she's having an orgasm. Leg printing is weird. Totally inaccurate.