Brice Marden
-
Posts
28 -
Joined
About Brice Marden
Recent Profile Visitors
560 profile views
-
Mostlytechnic here.... personally felt like I didn't do much this game. Had the 1 shot PGO that I used the last night after claiming (in case someone tested the claim) but otherwise didn't have the time I usually do, plus hard to keep track of everyone's block figs! I remember the character images more than names (particularly at first) so needed some time to get names/faces together. I think I was the root source of all the cursing though - that puzzle from the hosts, I won. My prize - had to do 1 of 3 things each day. Either I could curse someone (and had to decide what the curse would be), could give 3 others the ability to curse someone, or pick a flavor for the day. Not too familiar with flavor and curses in mafia, so I was pretty bummed with the prize. I was assuming I'd get something good, not something just annoying to everyone :) Fun game, glad to win, and thought the minimal thing was very well done. Thanks!
-
Minimal Mafia Confirmation & Discussion Thread
Brice Marden replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Tis ok, we'll survive without the game for a day :) -
Oooh, I like that. Just cram the rolls in and let them rise. Pop! goes the scummo.
-
Raw? Really? You couldn't take 15 minutes to bake the things? And where's the icing?
-
Ya, don't think this will take long... Vote: Carl Andre
-
mmmm, cinnamon rolls. Now I'm hungry.
-
Thanks for the support Ell - you're calling it correct there. Maybe a vote against him on day 1, sure, but then again on 3? When my vote nearly tied him up and there were still votes to be placed and time for others to switch? Or I could have more easily just joined the Dan bandwagon if I was just trying to hide my scuminess by voting out a fellow scum? Right now carl is pinging me as hincky beyond words. I have no idea what you're thinking with all this "behidn the scenes" crap, but considering NO ONE has backed you up, I think you're our last scum there.
-
Well, not like I was going to claim it day 1 so you all could lynch me to test my allegiance. And I too await explanation, since I too don't know why you think you're confirmed town.
-
Just to clarify, since Anne's summary could be taken either way, but my vote for Robert day 1 wasn't a "you voted for me, so I'll vote for you" - it was because his justification for voting for me sucked. Would have voted for him if his vote/reason had been for someone else. As for proving I'm town... I freely admit I havne't been the most productive townie this game. Just my art getting in the way. However, I will throw out now that I do have a role. I'm a PGO. Not a full-force PGO (in case anyone's investigated/watched/blocked/tracked/anything else me), but only against a kill. So good thing the vig didn't target me, or he'd be dead too. Ditto for any scum kills.
-
Woo! 2 down, probably just 1 to go. Look's like Carl's got more 'splainin to do... hopefully today we can get any night info and finish off the last of the scum. Also, care to explain why Carl's quick mention of Jo as uncleared is a poor choice? Oh, Jo's poor choice since she started the lynch on Dan. That's good point. (maybe I need some coffee and get out of the paint fumes before I start reading and commenting)
-
Hey, note that I did NOT vote for you, just said I was likely to. And when was I all buddy-buddy with you anyway? There's so little to go on and I certainly don't trust you, I certainly don't consider you a buddy yet. However, I am getting a gut town feeling based on your reply to all the votes going your way, so I'm not going to vote for you today. Dang, that's harsh. However, I think you may be on to something here. So for today, I'm going to go ahead and Vote: Robert Mangold but if he comes up town, then Anne will be on my short list of scummos... it's possible you two are just townies butting heads, but I think one of you is more likely scum. So we'll see.
-
Well, if I had to choose between your claim and the investigator claim as being fake, I'd put odds on yours. Doesn't mean either IS fake, and I think it's nearly impossible for both to be fake, but sure doesn't mean I 100% trust either. Ah, so that's why it came out all of a sudden. That does make sense - but again, to play devil's advocate, it could also be a ploy hoping for a town protector to cover you and get caught. So far you've just said "I'm important and probably gonna die tonight" but that doesn't exactly help us at all does it... Oh, I fully expect there to be weirdness in the roles. In fact I KNOW there's some weirdness. Good to know... sucks when people get caught due to talking too much (been there myself...) Yeah, if the investigator is talking beyond a couple people that's bad. Can anyone confirm that there's too much talking occurring?
-
Well,if you are telling the truth then we can make some reasonable deductions from that. 1. You're not the investigator but are some other role (or how would you know you were blocked) 2. The scum must have for who knows what reason blocked you and copped you on night 1, found that you had a powerful role, and then decided to block again night 2. Ergo, they could NOT then know who the investigator was on night 1, and therefore could not have killed him/her night 2 based on knowing. It's slightly possible that they killed AND copped the same person night 2 (to see if they were taking out a role), but that seems a stretch. I'd think they'd want to cop a living target to help determine future kill priorities. All that is assuming they HAVE both blocking and cop ability. Or of course, there's the alternative explanation. You're a lying scum making up a story about being blocked. It'd be a fairly safe gambit, since the odds of 2 PRs being blocked both nights (assuming both town and scum have a blocker) and them coming forward now to reveal that they were a PR just to disprove you is pretty slim. Odds of some vanillas getting blocked and not knowing it seems reasonably high to make the risk. The one thing making me think you might be telling the truth is that your claim came out of nowhere. On the other hand, it'd be a pretty decent way for a scum to claim a PR and hope to get into the inner circle of the town. Or draw an investigator onto themselves while they have a watcher or something. Or to take out the investigator because they're a scum PGO, though that's not a common role. Hm. I'll have to think on your claim some more.
-
I'm here now, trying to catch up. Been crazy day in the studio. Spilled paint all over, big mess, you know how it is. Anyway... Ellsworth, what's with the screaming? Seems weird... Very interesting news from the investigator. For now I'll trust it since there's good likelyhood it's true. The odds of the scum figuring out a real investigator and killing him this fast is pretty small. So... guess I'll look for others to vote for. Still not sure why ellsworth is trusted by the investigator though. Just because one person trusts him doesn't make Ell trustworthy. So investigator, I hope you're very careful with what you tell Ell until you can confirm for sure his allegiance. Course, if he is scum and he knows who you are, you're already dead I guess. At this point, I'm likely to join the Dan bandwagon on voting. I'll hold off a little while though in case I see anything better. So far though no one else is pinging me harder. Hey, anything ever come of that quiz from our hosts the other day?
-
um, what more did you want me to say? I said it was for his strange voting yesterday, and multiple others have already beaten that horse every which way, so I saw no need (and was in a rush) to go into more detail. That said, I'm sticking with my vote. Tony just hasn't been screaming scum to me like he obviously has to others. Quiet, yes, but quiet doesn't mean scummy. Scum usualy are quiet, but not all quiet people are scum. Heck, there's a lot of quiet people here (and I'd put myself into that category so far) but there's only going to be a couple scum. Not saying I'm convinced that tony is town, he hasn't earned any trust yet, but I'm also not ready yet to lych him.