Well, I figure it's about time I weigh in on the discussion at hand. Thus-far, my suspicions have been drawn towards Micheal and Caleb... Both of whom seem (or seemed) set on one another. Their little squabble resulted in Micheal and Caleb both backing away from their arguments almost immediately, while Micheal still kept his vote on Caleb for no reason other than "he needs to vote." This strikes me as quite suspicious. I don't quite know which I find more suspicious at the moment, but I think one or both of them could be scum. At first I got the impression that it was one or the other, since scum don't usually argue with each-other in the day thread, but considering the very strange drop-of argument, they may both be scum attempting a bogus argument to distance themselves since they're both on the chop block. I'm going to vote for Micheal, but if either of you wants to explain how you could hold a seemingly strong opinion (strong enough to vote in Micheal's case) and drop that opinion after one post (but not the vote), then feel free to try and convince me otherwise. Nothing either of you has said today strikes me as particularly Townie either, although I'll admit I haven't gotten a strong read on anyone. Vote: Micheal (Mencot)
As far as Esther goes, I'm still pretty wary of voting off someone claiming to have a PR... even one who claimed the way she did. Also, on the subject, what's a "Soft-Claim?" When'd that become vernacular? She claimed to be a PR. There's nothing soft about it.