-
Posts
1,347 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by M_longer
-
That's a catalogue image of box, not some watermarked post stamps.
-
General Part Discussion
M_longer replied to Polo-Freak's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
- 5,789 replies
-
- rant!
- Bionicle Technic
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
42203 Tipping Dump Truck
M_longer replied to Thirdwigg's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
I have built the 42203, using those large frames gave it a bit of "Technic Dupo" feeling, few parts and we have whole frame. -
General Part Discussion
M_longer replied to Polo-Freak's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
Because it's perfect for some uses. By the way, Ecto 1 from CE used it like in old sets :)- 5,789 replies
-
- rant!
- Bionicle Technic
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Powered Up never had good days. Its parts are 2-3 times more expensive than PF counterparts, motors are weaker than PF ones - while being larger, does not come with physical remote (don't get me start laughing over that 2 dial one, please), did not had any support from LEGO from start (Racing Brick had made an enormous work for making a tutorials for PuP). To easy make and use something more than shown on the box, you need to use 3rd party app like Brick Controller 2. First set - 42100 - was a great motors pack. But after that we did not get anything like previous 8293 set - a cheep affordable set allowing to power up sets like 42068 with single motor. LEGO left the idea of single motor powering various models. Instead we got a few models that had overdesigned gearboxes, just to justify presence of THE APP. 42131 barely moved, everything took ages to work and it came with 4 motors only. With same price as 42100 with 7 motors at start. The whole policy about each motor being servo and propulsion motor made the motors much, much more expensive. Now imagine how much would cost 42131 with 6 PF motors and some decent bluetooth device :) All I see now is a quiet withdrawal of that nonsense after 6 years, (LEGO just put lefotvers from PuP on sale - only new 2in1 block from Porsche is "new") where Power Functions was used for 12 years, and only thing it needed was Bluetooth and maybe more powerfull rechargeable battery. And a as a designer who make models with instructions - nobody asks for converting my models to C+, but people asks if I'll gonna use PF for next RC model, becuase it's easier to obtain and much cheaper (let's be honest, people buy MK and CaDa motors). Prove me wrong :)
-
There's a saying in polish - "If something is (used) for everything, it's (usable) for nothing". Having overpriced motors that can serve both as servo and propulsion was a stepback, instead having decently priced motorized sets with single motor, we got few overpriced sets, with app that basically does nothing interesting.
-
LEGO City 2025 SETS - Leaks, rumours, discussion. (Animals too)
M_longer replied to Powered by Bricks's topic in LEGO Town
I made a small comparison. Thoughts?