TrumpetKing

I'm honestly not opposed to a Serial Killer lynch, but I would much rather see a lynch towards Cultist. I already called him out for something, and he gave a truly predictable response. At least Snake Charmer has tried to defend himself. Cult Leader, do you agree about Cultist? If you're going to bring out Snake Charmer, you should be bringing out Cultist for doing the same thing. Yet, he could just be a "dumb" (A more appropriate word escapes me) townie, because I don't know if a scum would d that just after somebody got called out for it.

Well, there's a rule that supposedly changes every day thread or so, Mr. Tree Stump.

There you go, this is sort of what I wanted to hear. I believe the Snake Charmer gave the same defense, no? It's still a bit scummy to me, but you're clearing things up.

Cultist the problem that you apparently aren't seeing is that you called Snake Charmer out fir something that he did, and then continue to go on, doing the exact same thing as him. Don t you think that's a little bit weird?

This is what earned your suspicion. You did not mention waiting for the SK's answer, but for the Snake Charmer's answer. Ping.

I definitely wouldn't call myself aggressive. Maybe strict at times, but I don't think I'm aggressive. Thank you for your response. What would make you vote for the SK? Are you not at all bothered by Snake Charmer and Cultist? If so, why not? They are probably the two scummiest here.

There are some people here that are frustrating me, by reading the thread, then leaving without saying anything. You might not be involved in what's currently being discussed, but your opinion matters greatly. Virgin, I see you are sitting here currently. I want you to voice your opinion. You've been one of the quieter ones, and I want to hear what you have to say about everything. Do you think Cultist or Snake Charmer is a better lynch?

The tally is messing my head up then. Jamesn's tally was messed up a bit, then, because I believe his said that you had fake-voted me.

I have been thinking that he wasn't being serious as well, and I think he's probably been less scummy of the three suspects I presented. I personally think we will learn more by lynching The Cultist or the Snake Charmer. I'm going back and forth between the two, which is why I haven't cast my vote yet, because I only have one shot left. I think maybe the Cultist was better, since he seemed to defend Snake Charmer, so if he turns up scum, we can use that to determine whether Snake Charmer is scum. The same goes with lynching Snake Charmer. If we lynch him, for seeming to defend Serial Killer, and he comes up scum, we could use that to decide whether Serial Killer is scum. Personally, I'm impartial between the two. Unvote of the fake vote: Serial Killer (Walter Kovacs) Fake Vote: The Cultist (Fred Daniel Yam)

May I ask why some names are blue? And Tamamono un-fake-voted me... DarthPotato is the one who fake-voted me.

Something else I feel like bringing up. Has anybody else noticed the absence of the Jester and the Doctor? Probably not somethong we should worry about right now, but we should definitely take note of it. I think the best three options for today are Serial Killer, Snake Charmer, or Cultist, for SK's confusion, and the crazy possible defenses surrounding the triad. And Female Lover, where was a vote placed on Snake Charmer from Cultist? I don't believe I saw one cast. Oh, I think you mistook The Cultist (Fred Daniel Yam) for the Cult Leader (Rufus). Have those bananas n your pants been affecting your memory?

Thank you for the clarification. I feel the need to answer the questions, because if I don't, I'll be told things like "You didn't answer me", so I'm just trying to stay on top of them. Sorry if that bothers you. Did anybody notice The Cultist's weird statement? I mentioned it earlier, but it was really strange. It was basically like saying "I think Snake Charmer is scum because he said he would hold off from voting for Serial Killer, but I'm going to hold off from voting for him".

Your fake vote tally is far off. I fake voted Serial Killer and Godfather un-fake voted me. I'm not worried everything I'm doing is a scumtell. I'm explaining everything so those that ask me questions don't crap their pants if I don't answer them. And since when has 3/23 been a majority? And how am I talking too much to say very little about what I've been doing on Day 1? Please clarify. I read the majority part wrong. I see it now says minority.

You say Snake Charmer is acting suspicious, yet you do the exact same thing that got him suspicion? Seems a bit weird to me. And I'd like to add, Cultist, that while you say I haven't added anything, I have added much more than you, IMO. I was only role-playing at the beginning.....

I see you have added more. In response: Section 1: As you said, I was just roleplaying. Section 2: Talking Animal's post didn't read as a joke to me at first. However, I'm not used to seeing him around here, so I don't know if he is usually like this. I do read it as a joke now, though. I did have a feeling he was joking after my post, however. Section 3:Roleplaying Section 4: See section 2. And I've seen people get accused over incredibly stupid things before, so I guess it was just habit. If I were entirely serious he would have been my vote choice. Section 5: No, I was referring to Talking Animal's, I believe. That was when I really started to realize that he was joking. Section 6: Yes, in response to the Vanilla Townie. Section 7:I've made votes like that plenty of times before. And that is exactly the vote example you just gave. Voting somebody until they can talk and/or explain themselves. Section 8: Uhh what? He posted while I did. Section9: Because I thought he was serious and I was asked about it. Like I said, if I'm asked something, expect me to respond, because when people don't respond, the question askers tend to get mad and occasionally flip out over because somebody missed a quick question.

In response to the Serious Roleplayer: I would call my "quick defense" more of an explanation. If defense is a more appropriate word to you, by all means, use defense, but that's your opinion. If I'm called out for something, I'm going to explain it. That's how I am, and how I have always been. I didn't realize there was a 1 unvote rule, so I didn't think about it, and I brought the SK up as an example. I said if I were serious, then my vote would have been for Talking Animal, but it wasn't. Serial Killer was looking more suspicious so I fake-voted him, because I'm not going to be completely convinced he's scum until he talks. Serial Killer was merely an example. About my first sentence: I do agree with you. I have a tendency to say things that sound fine in my head, but end up jumbled when I say them. I'm sure there's one of those somewhere in this post. It looks fine to me, though.

I meant "may have wasted my *un*vote".

That's a great idea, Hinckley. Sorry if I'm in the "Middle-of-the-pack", I thought I was being mire helpful than some. Kadabra, I may have wasted my vote, and jumped on somebody who was acting confusing, but it was brought up that they were joking, and I forgave them. If I were serious about him, I would have voted for him. However, SK is confusing me very much, and I want to hear from him. Fake vote: Serial Killer (Walter Kovacs)

Picked up Medusa and the Revolutionary Soldier yesterday, because I know they're sought-after. Not really figures I was interested in, but now that I have them, they're way much higher up on my favoritism scale than before, especially Medusa. I was also surprised that the Soldier's hair was a hard plastic. Quite a nice surprise.

NPC, I just re-read Role Player's statement. I had read that wrong, and thought he was quoting me. Oops.

I think currently, the vote that makes the most sense is the one behind the Serial Killer. Though I think the NPC is acting weird, the Serial Killer s logic is also very strange. The Werewolf has already said that everything would be randomized. Do you have anything to follow up or clarify about your logic in that statement? Because I think everybody here would appreciate some.

There you go, Female Lover.

Please read above a little.

I was speaking for the Snake Charmer because A.) I didn't see whether the Snake Charmer was awake or not. B.) I was explaining to Talking Animal that those "fingers" were snakes, due to section A. I also felt the need to point out that his logic was off by clarifying the snake situation. Do know that I considered that he was joking, so it maybe wasn't necessary, but I felt like I should have brought up the logic used, when I wasn't sure if it was a joke o not. You did provide an explanation, and I do think you had some reason behind it, so I will Unvote: The NPC (Esurient)

Oops, he just posted an explanation. I'll take a look and see if it's worth changing my vote.