Jump to content

sp1984

Eurobricks Vassals
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About sp1984

Spam Prevention

  • What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
    Pirates
  • Which LEGO set did you recently purchase or build?
    21322

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Extra

  • Country
    Poland

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Regarding spare parts from Blink/PABs I think it really depends. If you buy all spare parts in Bricklink/PABs to build given model then yes its really expensive comparing to buying ready set from shop or second hand (not MISB of course). But if you have some basic/core sets, which are decent parts pack then you can buy only some additional parts which are needed to build given another model (older set which you like) or some MOC. I have following sets a.o.: 42128, 42110, 42144, 42157, 42158, 42124 so its decent base I think. Also bought some additional used parts on BLink on decent prices so think it is good approach. For example I missed set with linear actuators (as my Lego dark age ends in 2021) so I bought some on BLink: 6 pieces for 38$ - is it expensive? Maybe, but I didn't want to buy whole expensive Cat D11 42131 set mainly for linear actuators (of course this set is big parts pack as well, but I just bought different sets mentioned above). I bought also used Boost hub for 20$. It works normally and this part on Lego.com shop is really overpriced and whole Lego Boost sets on second hand market are really overpriced too. Yes I know it is a mediocre hub but wanted it for my 6 yo son to introduce robotics to him. So in that role its a good part I think. Also I bought some cheap city parts as nice addition to play, like boats, fences, train parts or some old town/city era harbour crane parts so now can build cranes with kids and have lots of fun :) Just my thoughts :)
  2. Hello maybe it is a bit weird question here on EB regarding vacuum cleaner model :) So I life in a medium sized flat and have kids so there are quite lot of bricks on a floor around a flat. Some bricks are deliberately put on a floor surface for bigger playing and building area, while some lost accidentally during playing, etc. Now I use old bagless type vacuum cleaner which is good as it has transparent - clear bin where it is easy to see bricks picked-up (sucked) inside, among dust :) However bagless design has its flaws as not so big bin (about 2 liters), and requirement for frequent maintenance or otherwise filters gets congested easily. Therefore I consider buying bag type design vacuum cleaner but concern is that it will be harder to retrieve bricks which was sucked inside while cleaning. So do you have any experience or recommendations? Kind regards :)
  3. Hello Regarding discussed topic but from different point of view. Imagine paid instructions on Rebrickable for MOC. There is an usual page with photos (or renders) of given MOC model, some teasers from instruction, etc. So if I skip buying that paid instruction and just building given model on basis of that photos and instruction teaser- so its kind of reverse engineering which take amount (quite a long sometimes) of time. Is such practice above allowed, without issues with rights and licences? In my opinion yes, just wanted to be sure. Regards
  4. Hey I recently borrowed spike prime hub from my local education centre/library. Unfortunately I got charging issues as I was not able to charge hub - it was blinking orange light all time, wchich means low battery level. For charging I used decent 5V charger and decent USB cable (not chinese cheap ones), not used LEGO USB cable as it was not available at store. Also the guy who had knowledge in that LEGO Spike resigned some time ago and now nobody was able to help me there with hub issues. I returned it back, but didn't play that hub at all as it was low battery all time. So did that hub was damaged, or you really need LEGO original USB cable for charging? I do not think so as decent USB cable should be fine, but not sure... Regards
  5. 42175 Volvo FMX Truck & EC230 Electric Excavator - 2274 pcs - $199.99: as EC230 excavator will it be rather pneumatic set or linear actuator set?
  6. I bought 0.5 mm braided polyester cord to replace thinner LEGO City cords and that from LEGO is softer but its OK. Also as replacement for Technic cord I bought 1 mm waxed cord dedicated for jewellery work. It is more rigid than original LEGO, but it is fine I think.
  7. Hey Thank you for your replies. I need some standard size actuators for MOC's but Lego ones became scarce in my country and are in low quantities or/and rather expensive. So was thinking about that CADA as replacement.
  8. Hello question about linear actuators. Does CADA technic linear actuator is compatible with Lego Technic? Is it well designed and smooth operation? Found one here: https://decadastore.com/products/cada-10-15m-middle-hydraulic-cylinder-jv9033 it is pretty cheap (1 euro per one piece) so I am afraid that quality maybe rather low... Also does that shop seem legit? Regards
  9. What date we can expect those soldiers parts as PAB?
  10. Hello Have question regarding Lego, Lego technic string/cords diameters. I would like to have custom strings with any length for my constructions, so need to know Lego strings diameter to use the same custom string with preferred length. Therefore please give me info about diameter of: 1. Standard lego (city) string - String cord thin, 2. Technic string (grey colour like in 42128 tow truck set) - String cord medium thickness. Kind regards
  11. Is this Mindstorms set worth buying in the end of 2022 year? LEGO com has it discounted by 20%. Prefer use Pybricks on this hub. Tell me please which comparable kits has got ahead of Mindstorms? Why you think Mindstorms couldn't keep pace with the market?
  12. I think that Lego generally not used knob/crank mechanisms for rotating turntable in their excavator models. Only Technic excavators with rotating mechanism were: 8837 - pneumatic excavator, 8043 - motorised excavator, while most models had freely rotating (with hand) turntable, ie.: 42053 - Volvo excavator, 42006, 8851 - vintage predecessor from 1984 . So here for 42144 I guess it would be freely rotating turntable too.
  13. It seems that model lacks of steering mechanism of front axle. Am I correct? I think that 42053 had steering mechanism of wheels... Edit: zoomed picture from catalogue and saw there is knob visible in the middle of front of a chassis, so it seems to be steering mechanism. So, sorry for wrong assumptions ;)
×
×
  • Create New...