AndrewShun

No pun intended

When are more pictures of the April wave expected to appear? I'd really take a closer look on that Slave

Illuminati confirmed

Well, the reason I was asking is because I am an administrator of a public, which published this picture and my partner made it himself. It's just interesting how fast it can spread :)

I can not see anything until I join. And not having a facebook page doesn't help. Could you please find when this picture had been published?

What Facebook group? Do you have a link?

Thank you

That's some remarkable rendering quality. Can you give a specific link to a program downloader?

I could make it clear for you, but since we're no longer discussing it and you want me to be unreasonable, so be it.

Where is the negativity in calling things by their names? To be realistic, yes, TLJ is awfully bad. It might be negative, but it's the fact and the estimate this movie deserves.

I'm sorry, but TLJ is a pile of shit. That movie is a complete failure in all acpects of cinema, except for a graphical

I wouldn't expect any "seriousness" from Disney. So far, everything this company has been doing to the Saga was concocting uninteresting cringy stories with uninteresting characters, making big money because of its name and old folks. The only ok movie is Rogue One. Other stuff is just horrible.

Stop youing. I can imagine a lot of people buying it, just because they tend to buy things no matter how crappy or useless these things might be. I'm also not saying kids wouldn't want it, because kids tend to differ, they're humans. And if you don't see it's bad, it's not my fault either. I appreciate your reply, though don't really need it.

All these positive comments surprise me as well. I get a feeling that people know something great about this set that is missing on the pictures. Mainly because people who have spare money to spend on that set must be adults in general, and I don't see how a grown up person could spend a huge amount on that. It's not a collectible, it's badly designed, not a display model for sure. It doesn't look like a rational option for a present for a child either. I'd imagine if my relatives ever gifted me a set like that back when I was a kid, I'd be like "really?". 'cause it's messy and poor looking. I'd better go and gift my child a Ninjago City, for example, because it's a stunning model and we could watch the latest movie together as well. I'm not sure every kid can even recognize this huge (talking about 75222) pile of weirdly connected pieces.

Exactly my thoughts

Now I'm just gonna be saving up more money for the next year's UCS. Minifigures are great in 75222, and so is Slave I at that scale. But the set itself is horrible. That's all

Why do these people discuss 2019 leaks in this topic. I don't get it

Shouldn't it be smaller?

I hope CC will be fully covered unlike DS

Tried to run the program and I got a problem with it. After clicking the "Render" button the window of a rendered picture remains clear and no process has been running after that so far after multiple tries.

Are you sure you captured its length right? I does look a bit too long from these angles

Here's a question for you guys. If the largest UCS set of 2018 really turns out to be a CC, would you like it to be like Death Star or with an exterior? To me, DS is an ugly looking set without covering. All those rough angles look aesthetically disgusting. That clumsy thing just doesn't look like a DS to me. Imagine my disappointment, when we found out that the latest DS was going to be a remake of the first version. Here I'd sacrifice some of the play features for sake of looks.

I'm sorry, but you are wrong. There are lots of different ways imo. While looking at it I imagine one already

I like everything about it except that corner: looks very sloppy. I'm sure they could have done it better

It could be a huge Cloud City set for example :)