Karalora

It's on r/legoleaks. Looks like a red (or red-orange) elephant costume, pastel jester, and a box-shaped costume that people are comparing to a pop-tart, but I think it might be a floral-patterned gift box?

3. Any "similar character" to Sherlock Holmes is also going to be primarily a detective. Maybe this needs something more akin to the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen where it's a team of famous 19th Century literary characters, all with different specialties? 4. Good point that pure Warring States would lose the ships...maybe do more of a mashup of eras with the Mongols as a "wild card" faction that can complicate any samurai vs. samurai situation? 5. Explaining why "always chaotic evil monsters" is problematic is outside the scope of this thread, but hopefully the trend away from it in fantasy fiction speaks for itself. I think the premise would be more popular if it were more nuanced and there were heroic orc/goblin characters as well as human/elf antagonists.

1. This sounds delightfully whimsical. You mention futuristic technology, but what's the overall vibe? Maybe everything is underwater because it's a fantastical universe where everything is water and the surface is completely unknown! 2. Why the 1960s specifically? Is it for Cold War vibes, the fashions, or something else? 3. A Victorian-era theme would be excellent, but I'm having trouble visualizing "Sherlock Holmes vs. Jack the Ripper" as a concept. Sherlock isn't an action hero, he's a master detective who solves crimes after the fact. What's the intended dynamic here? 4. A "historical Japan" setting would also be excellent, but I'd be leery of applying "good guys vs. bad guys" to a historical scenario that could easily be coded to modern nations that are often in conflict. No, modern Japan and Mongolia are not at odds, but modern Japan and China are in certain ways, and given that the Mongols were the rulers of China at the time of the invasion in question...yeah. I think a better use of old Japan would be to set it in the Warring States period (as I believe classic Ninja was) so that all the color-coded factions are Japanese and the question is avoided. 5. On a related note, medieval-style fantasy has lately been leaning away from "good human(oids) vs. evil monsters" precisely because it reminds people so much of real-world racial stereotyping and conflicts. Maybe as a variation on your concept, color-coded evil wizards could be controlling or manipulating multiple groups and making them fight each other when they would normally be at peace, and the line could follow a core group of characters representing all the groups who have somehow resisted the mind control and are trying to sort things out.

Yeah, same. Minifigures are blocky (and we like 'em that way, they're distinctive and iconic!), their animals should be comparably blocky.

White and black koi suits = really offbeat Avatar: the Last Airbender cosplay.

If it's the blurry image on the subreddit, I doubt. It looks like the minifig head has a molded nose, which would be an utterly bizarre manufacturing decision.

Okay but that Easter egg... And the bubble blower!

This, pretty much. A licensed CMF works best as an adjunct to an entire line, when the cast of characters (and/or variant costumes) is large enough that it's not feasible to include them all in the set(s). For a single movie (or, more likely, a movie franchise) to get a CMF--but no sets--it would need to not only have enough humanoid characters to fill out all the slots, but have its appeal revolve entirely around the characters with no iconic scenes or locations to use as a "stage" for said characters. I can't think of any examples off the top of my head, and I will note that of@williejm's examples above, Snow White already got a full-fledged set with most of the main cast (with the Villain appearing elsewhere prior), and Encanto was made into a minidoll line. For Inside Out, I think we only got the Brickheadz and that abstract cube thing, but I think the characters as minifigs would be the most appealing in sets that replicate the whimsical design of the mindscape shown in the films.

Most Disney movies don't have a big enough cast to fill out a CMF with characters that would be widely desired.

This is a fair point, but minifigures tend to be more archetypal than real people, in no small part because they have to be very simplified at their small scale.

Facial piercings on punk or goth type characters would be cool, but I'm not sure how well they could "read" at such a small scale of printing.

Yep, that's similar to my system. What I like about the bead boxes is that they are semi-transparent plastic, so it's easy to find which box I need when they're all stacked on my shelf.

I sort my minifig parts into cheap bead storage boxes--I have a couple boxes for hair, one for heads, two for torsos, etc. I use the compartments to further break them down in ways that make sense to me. Built minifigs are sorted using tiered latch boxes with handles and are divided by setting theme (City, Pirates, Castle, etc.) I'm looking at my Kallax bookshelf right now and if I were using them for LEGO storage, the boxes would fit, though not all in one compartment. I'm afraid I can't give more specific advice than that because I don't know what sort of storage boxes are commonly available in Denmark. Do you have a big craft store chain?

She's SO CUTE. I got a couple already but I might need more!

23/16, baby!

Well if it does feature Ganondorf, it wouldn't be the final final battle of OoT, which is against Ganon (pig-beast form). "Diorama" makes me think of the iconic scene where Link confronts Ganondorf at his pipe organ, with Zelda captured in a pink crystal overhead. That would be a great scene to have for numerous reasons!

I tend to be wary of rumors that sound like something a lot of people really want.

I want to address this one in particular...firstly, there is a Cinderella minifigure in the updated version of the set, in fact the only Cinderella minifigure (not minidoll) LEGO has produced to date. So I'm not sure what the actual complaint is here. Secondly, the set is designed to replicate Cinderella Castle in Walt Disney World, not the castle that appears in the 1950 animated film Cinderella, which looks quite a bit different (compare here and here). As an icon of the theme park, it is considered a "home" for many princess and fantasy characters. The Cinderella name is fairly perfunctory; the fact that it's not "Cinderella's Castle" should indicate that she is not being credited with ownership. Again, not sure what the objection is. There are plenty of minidoll sets focusing on Cinderella if that's what floats your boat.

Oh gosh, tons! Some of these are easy enough to make out of existing parts, but unique versions would be fantastic. From your list: Grim Reaper Headless Horseman Vampire Lady (there's actually a very cute one with the new haunted house 3-in-1 set) I would also love to see: Bride of The Monster Ghost Bride Gravedigger Evil Scarecrow Gruesome Vampire (a la Count Orlok) Pumpkinhead (a monster or character with a jack-o-lantern for a head) Zombie Cowboy Dark Fairy Monster Costume Kid I could keep going.

What pirate archetypes would you want that haven't been in CMF already? Or are you just looking for an excuse to get a bunch of unique pirates?

I never found the full masks creepy, but I can see why designers might prefer to show off their work on the faces.

That's fair, and to be totally honest in my joy of pedantry I completely lost track of what this thread is actually about!

I'm not a linguist, but languages develop in response to the experiences of the speakers, and words like "ape," "monkey," and (for example) the French two-for-one "singe" originated well before the Age of Exploration introduced Europeans to the full range of creatures we now know as apes and monkeys. When the only primates known to natural philosophy (not yet "science") are Egyptian baboons, Barbary macaques, and chimpanzees, you might well use the same word to categorize all three. I'm pretty sure that even in English, "ape" and "monkey" were used pretty interchangeably until zoologists started to nail down the differences between them. To be pedantic about it, "monkey" is a terribly imprecise term--all the creatures we English speakers call monkeys do not comprise a proper monophyletic clade; the ancestors of catarrhines (Old World monkeys and apes) and platyrhines (New World monkeys) diverged as ancestral prosimians and their subsequent "monkeyness" is a case of parallel evolution. This conversation is happening on a LEGO forum. Pretty wild, huh?

But if English isn't the poster's first language, they might not realize that. The real question, then, is whether the Librarian makes allowances for language barriers.

Oh NO that ghost lady is SO CUTE!