jorgeopesi

14) 3 points. 2) 2 points. 7) 1 point. 13) 1 point.

I have this function yet the autovalve will do this work with the two small pneumatycs so I called dipper to the bucket my fail . I have 8 functions but I only really need 7... any suggestions... Another great thing I though was that I could change the entire arm of the front shovel for a normal one like in 8043 and I will have two big machines in one. My attemp A model. B model, I think more difficult because the arm is more big, maybe it will be to heavy for the linear actuators but let´s will see...

3,5 kg with box I think something more of 2 kg with empty batery.

The hard part is finished, the only things I have to do now are the dipper, the autovalve, the bodyframe and think about what I will do with the extra function that I have... I can say that it is modular, undercarriage, body, arm and dipper that in the end I discarted the XL motor, it works perfect with reduction and a normal motor, and that everything works better that I thought.

I wanted to say that the softaxles over the wheels was in my opinion a little far of them but it isn´t important at all, there aren´t pics of the car... will you rebuilt it to do it even better?.

In my opinion your best car, maybe I would use a smaller mudguards but anyway it is a piece of art. Another advantage is that I can see a lot of room for a posible MOD, maybe RC edition or a more speeds gearbox , the last thing I have to say is that is a clear and simple design If I built the 8110 with a few pics I will be able to built this awesome car, good work and thanks for make the technic so beautiful.

Small, nice and with functions good work.

I saw a few days ago and it seems to me a big functionality model, the best functions grader in Lego I have ever seen.

Nice wheels and colors, a lot of green you can do all the John Deere machinery .

Of course not, one of the 5 motors will do the work but I don´t know which one . I though that with 5 motors I will have 8 functions and I only need 7, trasmision, change trasmision, dipper with autovalve, first LAs, second LAs, third LAs, rotation...and I have an extra... maybe I will build a 2 speed gearbox activated by an autovalve with the extra function, thanks to the subtractor and the only motor for trasmision I will do it.

I know and I know too where you lives , first of all the sense of humor after that love and technic of course . I wrote this in case my wife reading, kidding again .

Tracks video, I thought heavy machinery wouldn´t like but I was wrong, my Pagani finished only has 5 likes and only a tracks have 5 too... I have a dislike but always there are people who like to dislike . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D1dmjCc5H0&feature=channel&list=UL

Sorry for repost, here is the new undercarriage with subtractor added, I used a lot of gears... 26 12th gears and all of them importants, the most important thing is that it works and I can use a fake engine finally, let´s go to the top again... Sure you can see only 4 36th gear, I have a few on the way...

Congratulations awesome MOC, I think they will see more helicopters around here soon .

The original Sariel design is more compact I think and it works perfect.

More work, red points are where I will put motors, in the middle XL motor and still missing two, the one who change the functions of all motors and another for the autovalve who opens the dipper, 5 motors inthe end. In the pic you can see the subtractor system but I think I will have to discard because it makes too long the machine. The tracks are similar of the 8043 but it has a 4x4 gear system because I didn´t know if only 2 traction gears would be able to move the rubber chains with a lot of weight. The great solution, I have a big idea, I have to put the subtractor in the tracked part... I have enough room below and I will have more room up... How I didn´t realize before?... it's time to disassemble .

The set that interested me was the unimog, when I built I was very disappointed and I discovered much to my regret that I like more yours MOCs and mine than the Lego sets, I guess is the price for trying to be a good builder. Now when I look at the sets I only see parts... although I admit some small interest in the helicopter. Nychase I think 8145 is not a technic set but if it were... it would be the most beautiful set of all, in my opinion.

I need some advice... I tested the shovel with weight and two normal motors, one for each chain and woks fine but I think maybe I could use a subtractor system to can use a fake engine too because there is more room, new experience to me . The question is... a subtractor system with two normal motors will move the machine? or maybe I will need one XL in the system...

A WIP pic, undercarriage is almost finished I have to test with weight but I think it works, it is like the 8043 undercarriage with modifications. The arm is mauch more hard to build it... another one difficult thing will be the motors zone, gears, gears and gears... . Sorry about the blue pic...

Thanks nychase, sure all this information will help me.

Wow a multipneumatic MOC, everything on it moves, good work Timr!.

A nice MOC for cuusoo, small with a couple of pieces and easy to build but sure not easy to design.

You don´t need time if you are fast , I am still looking machines. Thanks for your interest, I will try to do my best, maybe can be one of these... Another problem will be the linear actuators position, I like to be realistic but I will have to put the first ones and the third ones the opposite to the original, of course colour won´t be white, yellow or red I think...

Here I will post my work on this project. My attemp will be a front shovel, I know there are a couple very good but my intention is to use linear actuators in the arm and maybe one or two small pneumatics in the dipper, I want too that all engines are on the same site as in 8043 that is the challenge and the difficulty. I don´t know what model I am going to do, I am still looking but the big problem will be to do one that is in appropiate proportion with the Lego linear actuators. I think I will use minimum 5 motors, 6 big linear actuators and one or two small pneumatics... we will see if I am right.

I totally agree.