-
Posts
1,816 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Norrington
-
She's not a Nin.j.. Oh dear... Ah, there's no particular reason I know that... *Cough* I'm going now...
-
Eh, I have much better and less degrading things than to go around indecent in public. |-/ Yeah, well, movies and actng is really just @^#% lying to an audience, isn't it?.[qoute name=Hinckley39' post= '172786' date= 'Jul 9 2007, 08:59 PM] I was naked in a show a couple of years ago. I invited some friends and forgot to warn them. After the show they said "Nice show. We saw your junk." All my other friends had fair warning...Actually the show was horrible. It was the worst reviewed show I've ever done. One night during curtain call, the audience didn't clap. [/qoute] Eh, thats... disturbing. I'm never going to act. EVER.
-
Eh... More than I needed to know... *Crosses "actor" off list of aspirations*
-
Well, let's see. *Pulls out list of things that are more fun than being nude in public* Ah, here we go. 1) Being shot in the back of the head 2) Being impaled on a stake in the ground 3) Being burnt alive 4) Having your head lobbed off 5) Being beaten by the police or the mob The list ges on...
-
So, I assume you were Cupid or something? Eh, I hope you were wearing some form of clothing to cover your... *AHEM*... you know in public. |-/
-
Ah, so it isn't. Here is my Beckett: (Trust me, it looks very good when resized.) Also, my Admiral Norrington which I feel is a little more acurate to the costume: (Also, the best head for Norringotn is Luke Skywalker, as it is for Beckett) BTW, You seem to be using my outdated Captain design. Here is the updated version: Also, am I correct in assuming that the Lt. in the boat and the Marines on shore are my torsos too?
-
*y* Very nice! Though, Beckett was my torso.
-
I voted "sock" and "a poll." Hmm... I don't know why, but I started chuckling to myself when I read the word "sock"... I need to go lay down...
-
Heh, lets say Narcissism OFF! @Yoda: You look alot... different than I expected in that picture. Perhaps one that looks like you arn't drugged up? :-P @Sinner: A nude streaker, eh? Was it cold in that theatre? :-P J/K Oh, well... scince I have no pictures to give, here's a joke: Why did the Skunk get run over? ... 'Cause he lacked Common scents! Oh, I think a little bit of me died in side... :'-(
-
Yesterday: I got a bunch of vintage plates and bricks from a neighbour kid. I also got my first Fabuland figure, Evan Elephant! Today: Skeleton's prison carriage
-
In this order here are my most recent movies in reveiw form: 1) Pirates of the Caribbean, At World's End Thoughts: The movies was pretty good. Better than Dead Man's Chest, but not as good as Curse of the Black Pearl. To qoute the "Ask a Ninja" reveiw of AWE; "Take the confusion of PotC:DMC, multiply it by a bucket of chicken, and you have PotC: AWE." I think they didn't want to make any sequels, so they made the writers kill of all the "Bad Guys" (Norrington was not a baddie! He gave his life for Elizabeth!) Final Rating: *y* *y* *y* *y* (out of 5) 2) Shrek the Third Thoughts: Very amusing! I noticed that in the Palace scene with Prince Charming, that the giant portrait in the backround is the painting of Napoleon's coronation, and the music during the play at the end was "Danse Macabre", by Franz Liszt Final Rating: *y* *y* *y* *y* 1/2 3) The Haunted Mansion (on DVD) Thoughts: Well, this was an attempt to catch on the "Make a DisneyLand ride into a movie" bandwagon, and was not very good. The sets were marvelous, the score amazing, and costumes perfect! The story, however, lacked. I'm sad that my second favorite Disney ride had to be disgaced like this. :'-( Final rating: *y* *y* 1/2 4)Liscence to Wed Thoughts: Very nice! I don't have much to say, but I liked it alot! Final Rating: *y* *y* *y* *y* 1/2 There you have it!
-
Actully, no I don't think religon will bring us together. :-| Gawd 4J, that is SOOOO Amish! X-D J/K I'm just saying that we get to know people better through their beleifs (etc.) that we can grow stronger as a trusting community and become sensative to others and what they beleive in or how they choose to live their lives. That's all. Is it really that bad? :'-( And to add to the concept I'm trying to get across: I don't care for main-stream religons and their "tedious" rituals. So you know something about me: I don't care for organized religon. I only follow my own morals and senses. Now how could we work that further into this little excercise?
-
How do you mean? *wacko*
-
"Kill Jar Jar" Contest Rules & Discussion
Norrington replied to xwingyoda's topic in Watto's Junkyard
Great entries so far you guys! *y* Slow down there, bucko! Not to be the FCC of Eurobricks, but perhaps you meant that: "It had the reproductive organs of a male Donkey in it's mouth." See? That way it sounds funnier*, and it's Politicly-Correct!*Well, to me at least. I've been told I have a rather strange sense of humor. :-) -
Compare 60 years to how long people have been immigrating to America :-)
-
I guess we both have different definitions of "Peace, Love, and Understanding". I mean it for eachother, not our hobbies. I think that getting to know eachother and our beleifs and veiws may help strengthen EB as a community. :'-) When you think Norrington, think "Peace, love and Understanding!" ;-)
-
I rated by itself: 5/5; Compared to everything else: 3/5. *Begins pointing at Phes*Admins other than Mr.Phes, Admins other than Mr.Phes! Mr.Phes is telling me what to vote for, make him stop! X-D BTW, Mr.Phes, I made a Pirate smily we could add. *wig* = Whay'da think?
-
OMG! It's the apocolypse! To the bunker! :-D I realize how beleifs greatly differ and that it's a sensative topic. That's why I think if discussed on these boards it should be in a forum specificly for "Political, Religous, Lifestyle, and Beleifs only" that way the forum would be made clear that it's a serious discusion place and that the "weak of heart" may not want to go in, or risk being offended in some way. @SW4J: Well, forget that I said debate at all. The forum would be about sharing beleifs and learning more about one-another so that this forum may be filled with peace, love, and understanding. Oh God, I sound like a hippie X-O
-
I meant WWII. After all, we've really only been here for one generation.
-
Ok, lets get back on topic. Ater all, this might end up like the ice-cube tray thread: People go off-topic or 11+ pages and no-one has any idea what the thread was even originaly about. X-D
-
Well, it's just screen name. However, "Sinner" apparantly means "Fornicator" in Australia. ;-) And no, your comments didn't offend me too much. :-)
-
Sorry for the misunderstanding :-) After all, I did say "Ignore this comment if you blah, blah, blah."
-
I'm terribly sorry Mr. Dillon, but this is not Sparta. This Eurobricks. Anymore out bursts like that and you'll have to go see our site therapist. ;-)
-
Sinner, don't be mean or sarcastic |-/ (If you weren't being mean, ignore this. Blame the boards for not being able to tell me if you're being sarcastic.)
-
No, that is not the reason. The main idea is that everyone could share their beleifs so there could be more understanding on our boards. That way we could find out more about eachother more than we could with the "Hello, my name is..." threads. Of course, that was the idea |-/ *EDIT*: I just saw Paradosis' post, and I agree with these sentiments: "I think that I can understand part of the appeal of wanting a religious or political part of a board like this. You have a link with others through the enjoyment of LEGO, so you feel some type of kinship; from there, it's natural to be curious about what the people on the forum think of other subjects. It sort of fills out their personality, so you get a better perpsective about them, and maybe the LEGO building community in general. Still, like I said, I personally don't really delve into those type of subjects unless the forum was created for that type of discussion."