mahjqa

42209 electric wheel loader review I also massively dislike the clickbait title, and have no interest in your reasons for employing it.

0,5 stud travel for a shock gets awfully close to the flex that's already inherent in studless technic.

🎻

@Toastie Thanks for the info. I was torn on where to post it- it seems equally appropriate on either forum- but I was worried that posting on both forums would be considered spam. I'm so glad you all seem to like it, thanks for all the positive comments! In case someone missed it, I made this tiny one as well:

I was wondering whether to put this on the train forum or here- but technic won out.

I think having things run on batteries that are; universal replacable still being produced 20 years from now Is preferable to something that is none of those things. Remember the PF rechargeable batterybox? Once that's dead, it's dead. Your average consumer isn't going to grab a soldering iron and a TEMU-sourced battery to get that thing running again. Compared to this batterybox - produced 49 years ago. And if you didn't keep your leaky batteries in there, it should still work today. Just pop some new ones in and you're good to go.

@eric trax I know the price is disappointing, but can you please not use that kind of language for it?

The new variation can be printed, the old one can not. I would think that if no print is required, they'll just use the old one again.

I wonder how the ladybug tile gets used, or if that's an inventory mistake.

The shop.lego site mentions a rechargeable battery, this might go some way towards explaining the price. Though not nearly enough.

Pretty sure it's regular red.

Link: Tire 68.7 x 27 S : Part 52985 | BrickLink Nice that they're using them again.

Damn, you're right. Didn't remember them having that curve.

Yup.

If only they were available for literal cents on bricklink