Purplonia Pink

Gamer
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    30

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Purplonia Pink

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

291 profile views
  1. Purplonia Pink
    More thoughts on the game tomorrow; for now I will say that had I not died, Def and I would have owned the game!! Very bold move from the scum to target me!!
  2. Purplonia Pink
    Stupid scum; thanks for having me!
  3. Purplonia Pink
    I am so relieved! Thank you Helena for coming out with this info! I would like to take this opportunity to ask for forgiveness regarding my flailing-ness and genral lack of consistency in my defence; I am clearlynot good under pressure!
  4. Purplonia Pink
    I’m not convinced Gertrude is scum. I don’t think being outspoken in thread is a guarantee of anything, but I don’t feel comfortable trying to turn the lynch to her (and I don’t think I could ). We have to get a successful lynch today, and I know I’m town. Godric isn’t very townie-looking, other than his list he put together after he was on the lynch block. I don’t think he’s town, and scum are happy to spread misinformation before Dying. I think if he was townie, he would have published this list long before he was worried about dying. This combined with the fact I won't OMFGUS vote for Gertrude makes me: Vote: Godric Goaty-Blather
  5. Purplonia Pink
    I killed the thread! Either that or everyone's mind was blown off and died ... I WIN!
  6. Purplonia Pink
    Let's take a look at how the Gertrude vs. Purplonia case evolved: Once the day started, Gertrude was in total shock that they were both town after which I said: Now that everything is in one concise place, let's look at it: Gertrude was very quick in turning around what was initially a call to scrutinize her. If you look at my posts and look at what Gertrude is saying I said, you will notice that there is little correaltion; - I never said/implied she was OE which she alluded to twice - I never said that Gladiator was a town-only role; I said (several times) that it made more sense, was more balanced - Twitch said this: " It looks like as soon as someone disagrees with your accusations, and tries to shine the spotlight back on you... you just comply." which Gertrude later recycled into this: "you just back down and say, "Oh no, I think you're Town, let's look at someone else" whenever someone accuses you. That compliance is scummy." -> looking at my posts (from yesterday as well) I cannot see what they are ferring to, I did say once that Gertrude MAY be town based on her being vocal, but I fail to see other instances of such "compliance". Having said this, look at yesterday's events and how they unfolded, it is fairly similar. You are free to make up your own mind and cast your votes accordingly but remember, Gertrude called for and lead the lynches on 2 townies; I may not have had a particularily strong defence to offer but I am still unsure of what I am being accused of! (gertrude tells me she accused me three times ... I don;t see it!) I have explained myslef, several times! My logic is fairly sound, it has it's flaws but it is sound. You will notice that I did not accuse Gertrude because (as I said) she may be town, but her leading the lynch on 2 townies (now 3 actually!) is suspicious. Like you did yesterday; vote for someone you are not sure of (which will inevitably turn up to be town)! People have accused me of not putting forward accusations, but then no one else is!
  7. Purplonia Pink
    The way you are saying this is like I complied to several people which I did not, I answered that you MAY be town seeing that your behaviour is similar to Krup's and Wong in being vocal. You may not have said it, but others have said it to me in private, so yes you are again using confusion to your advantage. What does this mean "to even stick a FoS on so,done, let alone a vote"? I am trying to contact you as it is evident you are trying to lead a lynch on me today and that would only result in yet another town's folk being dead. I have no leads and no reason to vote for someone else except for speculations; I hate Dill's prose, maybe I should vote or accuse him of being too Shakespearian or writting too much to say very ilttle ...
  8. Purplonia Pink
    I've said it before and will say it again; How do you expect me to accuse someone when we have nothing tangible to base our accusations on? You are again accusing me based on my being confused and acting odd, as you did with Krup and Wong; a pattern is emerging! megablocking CHRIST Gertrude, what am I supposed to do ... let myself be lynched? You would like that too much! I don't understand why people are willing to turn a blind eye to your leading the lynch on townies! I AM NOT SCUM!
  9. Purplonia Pink
    you did not understand what I said .... did you read my other posts? My point is that Gertrude should probably be lynched because she led lynches on two people who turned town and that both displayed signs of being town in thread. Gertrude is vocal, it MAY mean that she is town as she is drawing a lot of attention; she MAY also be scum as she led lynches on 2 townies ... clear enough? It's all speculations
  10. Purplonia Pink
    No; you have to agree that usually by this time one person is cleared. Have you never participated in such activities? I my previous experiences, by day 3 someone was a mouthpiece for at least 1 PR if not more. My reasoning for asking for NA results was that we are still going on speculations; there is ZERO tangible evidence against any of us and we can assert that our collective perception of scuminess as so far been garbage. Are referring to Fertrude? I was .... no one in this setup is named Atrianny; if you meant Ariattny, I have no idead what you are referring to seeing I never mentionded her in any of my posts. I going to answer you assuming that you meant Gertrude. I didn't say that she was cleared, what I said was that being vocal and in your face MAY mean that she is town seeing that no scum in their right mind would attract that much attention. To clarify, Gertrude said this: To which I replied this: As you can see, she implied she was cleared based on a argument I made, I then repeated my initial statement which was that her actions resembled those of Krup and Wong. I did not say you were cleared ... you did, see above. When did I imply you were a OE? But you were wrong ... most of you had doubts about his scuminess and still followed Gertrude and company in his lynch; I did not for reasons stated earlier and it is my right to tell you that you were wrong. I have nothing else to say about Gertrude besides the obvious; she led 2 lynches on townies, 1 was lynched and the Vig followed her advice on kiling the other. The logic dictates that we should lynch her.
  11. Purplonia Pink
    I do agree that my not voting for Wong may be perceived as scummy but remember that I had made my intentions clear much earlier than when my vote was cast; I also feel that my reasoning behind my vote was sound. For Orion; thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. I have to admit that Rutherford would make a good candidate for a lynch based on his actions but I fear that such a lynch (i.e. without investigative, tracker or watcher) would only be a lucky guess. You have to admit that our track record megablocking sucks! This last statement makes me wonder if we have such results available; surely by day 3 some NA results have had to be insightful.
  12. Purplonia Pink
    I did not say you were scum amd I never implied you were not cleared. Your attitude is very in-your-face and aggressive, great attributes to have! Your attitude and hatred for dumb/new/ignorant players may however blind you as to the scuminess of others; Would you rather scrutinize me or someone like Orion whom has just said that he has no opinion. Orion just basically told us that even after everythig that transpired last night and yesterday he does not know what to think. I am sorry but at this point if you are just sitting back and waiting for others to move, you are either scum or dumb and I am neither. To address Pickle's statement; I barely bother to read your posts because your pose gives me headache and that I have yet to see you contribute anything pertinent to the discussion. What I understand is that you are suspicious of me for saying "I told you" in regards to Wong's towniness. Point me to the one post where I explicitely said that I was sure of his affiliation; I merely indicated that I was not comfortable lynching him as I thought he was town seeing that my interpretation of the gladiator role is one where the role makes more sense to be a town role.
  13. Purplonia Pink
    To justify my vote, consider this: Wong was way too vocal and attracted way to much attention on thread (and in private actually) for me to think of him as scum; I cannot imagine that he would not have been "brought back" by his fellow scums or that an attempt at diverting the lynch could not have been done to try and save his megablocks; none of that happened. I was once a confused townie and his behaviour reminded me A LOT of what I once did when scrutinized. Furthermore, the curse he used could not have had, IMO, been attributed to a scum; why would a scum want to put his head on the line by using such a curse? As scum, would you have used the curse and volunteered for the lynch ...it makes no sense! You are trying to tell us that your pursuit of lynches on both Krup and Wong, which were both town, should be overlooked? The argument you are making against me can be used against you; the reason you were so adament on lynching Krup and Wong is that you knew they were town and you used their confusion and "dumbness" to your advantage to mount a bandwagon.
  14. Purplonia Pink
    First let's get the formalities out of the way; how not surprising! I told you so ... I guess! Now are people willing to scrutinize the people who led the lynch on Wong and had Krup killed?
  15. Purplonia Pink
    I am not sure, I have no potato messages and my only clues as to towniness or scuminess are in these threads. I looked back and found some interesting facts from yesterday's vote when compared to today's First: Dillpickle was using words such as "sinister" and "deceiptful" to characterize Krup yet today he is ready to vote for Wong without having said anyhting, or barely anything, about Krup 2nd: Gertrude yesterday said this: and then this: These 2 statements to me indicate that she was sure of Krup's scuminess; she was confident enough in her assertion that he was scum that she felt it was possible for her to sway the vote towards Krup to spare Wong. Today whom did Gertrude vote for .... Krup!!! NOT! Wong! WTF? if you are so convinced that Krup is scum why did you not vote for him today? Here are your 2 posts for the day: This one where you cats your vote: And this one follwing Krup's calling you out: By the time you voted for Wong there were already more than enough votes for him to be lynched, yours was not necessary and as such you should have voted for the person you thought was the most scummy and based on your allegations from yesterday, Wong is not that person! Your vote, and it's justification, today are not consistent with your vote from yersterday, so much so that it make me want to Vote:Gertrude Tincanchew