CloneCommando99 Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 17 minutes ago, Scarilian said: these could be DC Very funny Quote
Sinistereo Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 1 hour ago, Scarilian said: Here is all the Superhero sets we know of for April/June, for release dates I've went with JediJACPenguin's list but obviously some could be switched to June. April: 76345 - 18+ 76347 - 9+ 76348 - 9+ 76354 - 18+ (3057 pieces) June: 11209 - 4+ 11211 - 4+ 76346 - 12+ (813 pieces) 76349 - 7+ (367 pieces) 76350 - 8+ (534 pieces) Thoughts: As applicable to most the list above, these could be DC or Marvel 9+ has been used for both the 'Epic Battle' sets so it's possible that 76347 and 76348 are 'Epic Battle' collection sets, the only other 9+ rated sets recently are the Spider-Man vs. Doc Ock Subway Train Scene & Fantastic Four vs. Galactus Construction Figure. 7+ sets we've had so far this year are almost all comic-inspired except for Iron Man & War Machine vs. Hammer Drones. 4+ sets normally denote the Spider-man & His Amazing Friends style sets or the junior focused stuff. If Spider-man: Brand New Day sets are happening they would likely be in either the June or August wave of sets. 76350 and 76346 would be my expectations if they are in the June wave, the inclusion of Punisher could be what has required the 12+ rating on the larger set. Would'nt be so sure about Punisher, could easily be just a torso print. I'd imagine the initial wave would be two sets with the figure list being: Spider-man Sadie Sink's character Punisher Hand Ninja's Tombstone Scorpion Bruce Banner &/OR Hulk Spider-Man BND sets are absolutely happening, no doubt about it. Quote
psqidexslizer Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 1 hour ago, Scarilian said: these could be DC There’s a better chance of them being based on The Boys Quote
doclord Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 Punisher could be a cheap figure, but it's the first LEGO version of the MCU version so I could see a unique head. I am not expecting leg prints for any figures and will be glad to have them- though Iron Man suits getting arm printing is a good sign towards better Marvel figures this year, IMO. Also, a thought- if the D2C is DC, I wonder if they will balance that with better figures for Marvel. Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 3 hours ago, Sinistereo said: Spider-Man BND sets are absolutely happening, no doubt about it. Oh yeah, don't worry about that, whichever month of sets they are, there'll definitely be a few coming. It's an MCU spider-man movie, it'll get sets. 2 hours ago, doclord said: Punisher could be a cheap figure, but it's the first LEGO version of the MCU version so I could see a unique head. I am not expecting leg prints for any figures and will be glad to have them- though Iron Man suits getting arm printing is a good sign towards better Marvel figures this year, IMO. Also, a thought- if the D2C is DC, I wonder if they will balance that with better figures for Marvel. A Jon Bernthal head would be nice, especially if they give one side his face mid-battle cry (I currently use this one, even with the stubble it's just such a perfect expression for it), but all I need from lego is that torso skull. I'm tired of using the crossbones and sog (with a neck bracket covering the back) torsos for my Rivals and MCU punishers. And we know from the Bugle set that they're fine making the skull. 16 hours ago, Toast said: I hope 76354 isn't this years modular just because the piece count is too low for a decent sized building. If so we have another X-Mansion on our hands. Hopefully the modular will be a 2HY set like the previous few years. It wouldn't be terrible- the bugle's about 500 more, but if you replace the 1x2x2 panels with larger window pieces you're a decent chunk of the way towards making that piece gap smaller- but you're right that the modulars are normally 2HY. Maybe 76534 is a big iron man helmet or something and Oscorp's still in that september/november window. 3 hours ago, psqidexslizer said: There’s a better chance of them being based on The Boys Or Invincible, or Spawn, or a direct deadpool movie tie-in, or- hear me out- it's the SDN building from Dispatch. Lego, if you read this, they do have a bat-man. In fact, you could have both a minifigure bat-man and a buildable character bat-man, it's gotta be the perfect set in your eyes. Quote
doclord Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 1 hour ago, Mandalorianknight said: It wouldn't be terrible- the bugle's about 500 more, but if you replace the 1x2x2 panels with larger window pieces you're a decent chunk of the way towards making that piece gap smaller- but you're right that the modulars are normally 2HY. Maybe 76534 is a big iron man helmet or something and Oscorp's still in that september/november window. The dream would be that they finally realized Superhero D2Cs that aren't modulars (especially Marvel) don't really sell that well so they are doing one Marvel one DC modular a year. Quote
calebcold3 Posted December 23, 2025 Posted December 23, 2025 Here's my guesses for the April/June Sets: April: 76345 - Bust (similar to The Iron Man Mark IV/Iron Spider ones we got this year) 76347 - Epic Battle 76348 - Epic Battle June: 76346 - Some Gimmick set (either a buildable character, a smart brick set, etc) 76349 - Brand New Day set (Punisher Van?) 76350 - Brand New Day set (with Hulk) I feel and hope that the 3000+ piece set is a D2C Batcave (comic based) Quote
Swordy Posted December 23, 2025 Posted December 23, 2025 (edited) On 12/9/2025 at 6:33 AM, brickbride said: Doesn't the 76261 version count as a Raimi Goblin? He's very definitely the Goblin in this scene, not Norman. Or do you just mean with the mask? That would be ... something. Epic Moment! A bunch of anti-heroes saving the day with the power of love! Epic Moment! A superpowered hero and his superpowered buddy teaming up in order to beat their none-superpowered hero teammate to death (he absolutely would have died if Black Panther hadn't shown up, which neither Cap nor Bucky could have anticipated)! As for the third, I'm not so sure LEGO (or anyone really) want to remind people of the mess that was Amazing Spider-Man 2. I still want Strange vs. Dormammu, though. ;-) Iron Man with a nanobot sword vs Thanos on Titan would be pretty epic, too. Well, no, that’s Watts Goblin (as in Jon Watts, the director of NWH). Raimi Goblin in his Power Rangers armor is exclusive to the 2002 Spider-Man, and as goofy as that version is, it’s a wicked cool design at that. “Don’t take money… don’t take fame… don’t need no credit cards to ride this train… it can be hard, sudden, and a little cruel sometimes… but it might just save yours and all of NYC’s lives… that’s the power of love.” XD Obviously that was a joke suggestion, but it is a surprisingly wholesome moment from the MCU, which can’t count for nothing. I’m gonna leave this discussion as it was between you and MandoKnight, but I don’t believe “non-superpowered” is the correct way to describe a man wearing the firepower of a tank on him. Moreover, Cap’s goal was to keep Tony from killing Bucky, thus the main objective was to get rid of the potential killer’s only weapon… which so happened to be the wearable tank. All that said, to your point, I have never thought about how exactly Tony got home from Siberia, and considering that T’Challa potentially recovered Tony then turned around and aided Steve, T’Challa might be the MVP of the Infinity Saga. Spider-Man 3 is considered the worst of the Raimi trilogy (I’d disagree) and AoU the worst Avengers movie (on which I’d very much agree); quality of films doesn’t seem to be a factor so long as there is merchandise to be made—coincidentally, that seems to be a major factor in these films’ lack of quality. Good call; I adore the original Doctor Strange film, yet I hadn’t considered the potential therein. (Perhaps a minifig version of Dormammu would be used? The scale would be off but it would provide more than just the Weird Doc and a floating head.) I had considered the Battle on Titan, but I do believe, what with its scale, that battle should be reserved for a “Final Battle” set instead. On 12/12/2025 at 5:56 AM, Kaijumeister said: Agreed! I like to think they’ve been saving a Spider-Man 2002 final battle set until they’ve had the budget to produce a new helmet piece and give arm / leg printing too. Hopefully 2026 is finally the year it happens! I love the idea of being able to display this year’s train set, the upcoming SM3 one, and a hypothetical Spider-Man 2002 one alongside each other. I do think we need a new Tobey variant though, preferably his mask with battle damage. Leg printing is a must—particularly with the NWH Goblin in mind—but arm printing would be above and beyond any Raimi fan’s expectations. Considering that Tobey still lacks arm prints, though, I do doubt we’d see anyone else from those films get as much detail. Love to be proved wrong. On 12/12/2025 at 12:33 PM, Mandalorianknight said: I think there'd be a good chance at getting a fully kitted out Raimi Goblin and a new battle-damaged mask for Tobey in an Epic Moment set for that scene, since there's no other figures to put in and they could re-use Tobey's torso. The other Raimi epic moment has a new set of legs, two new torsos, and two new heads, so it's not impossible, especially since I think you could get some more use out of a Raimi Goblin figure. Yup. The Epic Moment subline, city-builder subline and the reintegration of the $10 price point are the three best possible things to happen to this theme IMO, and really puts lego marvel in a strong position for the future. The former two are sets that should appeal to kids while also meaning adults actually have a useful build for their displays instead of the spider-helicopter, and for the latter, who cares if you don't want the build, it's only $10 for the two figures! …Though I would have been OK if they'd omitted Ned and saved a print instead of giving him an exclusive torso. I’d actually prefer the World Fair/Times Scare battle so we could have an updated minifig of MJ (maybe even Harry for the first time), plus that scene has a better aesthetic in my eyes. Of course, additional minifigs would compromise the detail of said GG, nor would we have a battle-damaged Spidey mask, so I can see the point there. Nonetheless, however, would TLG really produce a set based off that tragic of a death? LEGO Marvel is in a brighter position than in the past few years. Paired with what you already stated poetically, however Doomsday will pan out, I remain optimistic for the potential upcoming sets to come out of it, and BND is looking more and more promising. To my knowledge, the torso Ned uses is a reuse from either LEGO City or Peter Parker in the Bugle. The arm/torso configuration is different, though. (I certainly wish Ned had been given a unique dark blue torso instead of a blatantly inaccurate red one—but hey, at least it wasn’t, like, two years of waiting for those characters.) On 12/8/2025 at 11:34 AM, Mandalorianknight said: Yeah, I see what you mean about the bike and will definitely be Moccing it, but at $10 it's just easier to buy this to use as a base when buying an older GR by itself would end up being more than that if you include shipping from bricklink. Plus, with this being the first one with a removable flame, if I don't want to display the penance stare I can replace his head with any skeleton head (currently planning on using the classis "evil" skeleton head from fantasy era) In regards to your F4 review, I think it does come down to, as you say, the best film interpretation, though still not a great interpretation. Johnny is less of a jerk than the 05/07 one, but so is comic Johnny most of the time. At least in most of the F4 stuff I've read, he's less of a playboy and more of the type of guy who falls in love with a new "the one" girl every two weeks and then when it inevitably fails falls in love again two weeks later. The other three may actually be characterized slightly worse than their 05/07 versions- even Sue, who has more depth of character than previous versions, feels like she got characterized to a different personality than her comic one. The current rumors still imply they cut a solid chunk of the good/fun characters (John, Ava, Alexi, Johnny, Ben) so we can focus on scattered bits of the thunderbolts and F4 alongside a whole Samvenger team that assumably assembles offscreen and will be full of phase 4/5 characters nobody cares about or likes. Also, (I hope this doesn't count as a spoiler) I saw a film set leak and the Russos have kept that stupid beret for John. Somebody needs to walk onto the set and swap it with the cowl while on his head indiana jones-stealing-the-idol- style. Don't even remind me about DDBA or it's "yeah we're pretty sure Daredevil's vaguely catholic, maybe, he's gonna act embarrassed when his girlfriend asks about it" stuff. I still can't believe that show managed to character assassinate (or actually assassinate) half the cast and yet it gets as many seasons as the netflix show? Sure, after some time the public will get more used to thing, but a big part of the character- especially early on- is that a lot of the outside world views him as a monster, and even after they realize he's on the good team are still uncomfortable or jumpy around him. Everybody seems absolutely fine and normal with Ben and there's no indication- not that it would necessarily be advertised- that he ever went through anything regarding his appearance. I see, and comparing some of the set’s pieces with other GR-cycle MOCs online, I do see promise. I may wait for a discount since it seems smaller than I had anticipated, but I’m nitpicking at this point; it’s a fine bargain at $10. Certainly. With retrospect, I will retract my comparison of it and CA:TFA; the latter was a true and successful adaptation of the comics and Cap’s character while perhaps not entirely succeeding as a film, whereas FF:FS is perhaps the vice versa. With First Steps, I believe the proper characterization is there, but perhaps only if you read outside material (i.e. comics) into the film, whereas The First Avenger presents the proper characterization without question. I’m still working out my opinion on the movie. I do believe that aspect of Johnny is in the movie. The line “Johnny loves women” does hint toward that, but I would critique First Steps in that it tells us instead of showing us. Possibly a simple outcome of the rigorous editing process—not to deny it is a fault, of course. Interesting to hear that. Perhaps the goal to redeem the Human Torch character went so far as to downplay the other characters. The more I think about it, all four of the FF needed to have that heart-to-heart talk that only Johnny had. The other three were too antagonistic to Shalla Surfer on Galactus’s ship for any of their characters to shine through. Yikes… that sounds rough. Not a fan of things TV-MA, but Daredevil is a favourite character of mine. (Not an unpopular opinion, I imagine.) I was initially excited to see if Disney could adapt the Netflix Daredevil into a TV-14 rating, and though the move to TV-MA was saddening to me, my hope was that it could only hold the same integrity if a more mature rating was given (something, something, complexity in television equals gore*). Sounds as though Born Again proved to be neither a jumping point for new fans or satisfactory for established fans such as yourself. That sounds about right for Doomsday, but I’m saddened to know that the film will revolve around my least favourite FF members. At least I liked most, if not all of the Thunderbolts/New Avengers. The Samvengers have never sounded intriguing to me, and the most I hope for from that team lies solely in the Russos knowing better about fight choreography than anyone working on BNW. (All I wanted was some new tricks with Cap’s shield, and I didn’t even get that.) You really hate that beret, lol. It’s stupid, sure, but I do appreciate that he now has a distinct silhouette from Red Guardian as well as two Captains America in a movie filled to the brim with superheroes. Obviously, his original U.S. Agent attire is far more ideal. First Steps wasn’t an origin movie, though. It sought to show the Fantastic Four in their prime, when everything seems to be going right for them until doomsday comes a-knocking. (No, not that Doomsday!) I don’t know if Ben’s grim mental state would have gelled as well with the movie’s storyline as the other three. I could envision a storyline with Ben discussing his monstrous appearance with Alicia that could later on connect to the Shalla Surfer story arc (sorta like I had mentioned earlier). At least Ben would then have had something to do; he just doesn’t have a critical/memorable role to play in a storyline where brute force means nothing. I’m more hyped for BND sets than Doomsday sets. We’re more likely to get classic Spidey villains than classic X-Men, I think. Edited December 23, 2025 by Swordy Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted December 23, 2025 Posted December 23, 2025 (edited) 10 hours ago, Swordy said: I’d actually prefer the World Fair/Times Scare battle so we could have an updated minifig of MJ (maybe even Harry for the first time), plus that scene has a better aesthetic in my eyes. Of course, additional minifigs would compromise the detail of said GG, nor would we have a battle-damaged Spidey mask, so I can see the point there. Nonetheless, however, would TLG really produce a set based off that tragic of a death? LEGO Marvel is in a brighter position than in the past few years. Paired with what you already stated poetically, however Doomsday will pan out, I remain optimistic for the potential upcoming sets to come out of it, and BND is looking more and more promising. To my knowledge, the torso Ned uses is a reuse from either LEGO City or Peter Parker in the Bugle. The arm/torso configuration is different, though. (I certainly wish Ned had been given a unique dark blue torso instead of a blatantly inaccurate red one—but hey, at least it wasn’t, like, two years of waiting for those characters.) I think so- it's a pretty iconic scene, and Norman's death isn't particularly graphic and falls into the "done in by his own evil deeds" trope that lego often uses in their own media to kill off villains. Absolutely. No matter what the source material is, the actual set composition is looking good. And so long as we keep getting comic and infinity saga sets, there'll still be some with good source material as well. No, you're right, I didn't check the torso itself, just the assembly. 10 hours ago, Swordy said: I see, and comparing some of the set’s pieces with other GR-cycle MOCs online, I do see promise. I may wait for a discount since it seems smaller than I had anticipated, but I’m nitpicking at this point; it’s a fine bargain at $10. Certainly. With retrospect, I will retract my comparison of it and CA:TFA; the latter was a true and successful adaptation of the comics and Cap’s character while perhaps not entirely succeeding as a film, whereas FF:FS is perhaps the vice versa. With First Steps, I believe the proper characterization is there, but perhaps only if you read outside material (i.e. comics) into the film, whereas The First Avenger presents the proper characterization without question. I’m still working out my opinion on the movie. I do believe that aspect of Johnny is in the movie. The line “Johnny loves women” does hint toward that, but I would critique First Steps in that it tells us instead of showing us. Possibly a simple outcome of the rigorous editing process—not to deny it is a fault, of course. Interesting to hear that. Perhaps the goal to redeem the Human Torch character went so far as to downplay the other characters. The more I think about it, all four of the FF needed to have that heart-to-heart talk that only Johnny had. The other three were too antagonistic to Shalla Surfer on Galactus’s ship for any of their characters to shine through. Yikes… that sounds rough. Not a fan of things TV-MA, but Daredevil is a favourite character of mine. (Not an unpopular opinion, I imagine.) I was initially excited to see if Disney could adapt the Netflix Daredevil into a TV-14 rating, and though the move to TV-MA was saddening to me, my hope was that it could only hold the same integrity if a more mature rating was given (something, something, complexity in television equals gore*). Sounds as though Born Again proved to be neither a jumping point for new fans or satisfactory for established fans such as yourself. That sounds about right for Doomsday, but I’m saddened to know that the film will revolve around my least favourite FF members. At least I liked most, if not all of the Thunderbolts/New Avengers. The Samvengers have never sounded intriguing to me, and the most I hope for from that team lies solely in the Russos knowing better about fight choreography than anyone working on BNW. (All I wanted was some new tricks with Cap’s shield, and I didn’t even get that.) You really hate that beret, lol. It’s stupid, sure, but I do appreciate that he now has a distinct silhouette from Red Guardian as well as two Captains America in a movie filled to the brim with superheroes. Obviously, his original U.S. Agent attire is far more ideal. First Steps wasn’t an origin movie, though. It sought to show the Fantastic Four in their prime, when everything seems to be going right for them until doomsday comes a-knocking. (No, not that Doomsday!) I don’t know if Ben’s grim mental state would have gelled as well with the movie’s storyline as the other three. I could envision a storyline with Ben discussing his monstrous appearance with Alicia that could later on connect to the Shalla Surfer story arc (sorta like I had mentioned earlier). At least Ben would then have had something to do; he just doesn’t have a critical/memorable role to play in a storyline where brute force means nothing. Yup- and that's what's so great about that price point coming back. It makes it a lot easier to get stuff as a part/figure pack, since it's such a reasonable price point to begin with. Yeah- they sort of imply it- and in doing so do the best job of the three movies at characterizing Johnny- but it's still not a great representation of the character. Which brings it back around to being the best film adaptation but still not a particularly accurate film adaptation. It's funny you say that, because your hope that a TV-MA rating was needed to keep the integrity seemed to be the showrunners' rationale as well, though they came at it more from the direction that if they kept the TV-MA, the show integrity would follow. They really hyped up in the marketing that it would be just as gory as the netflix show and that they weren't disney-ing the violence. The issue being, they focused on keeping the gore, not the substance. The show's themes/characters/etc are a hollow shell of what they were. And even the violence itself is a symptom of that- they go out of their way to make sure it's, if anything, gorier than the netflix show, but aside from one fight in the first episode, the fights feel almost cartoonish. It's like they thought that the gore was why the show was good, and that by making it more gory, to the point of being disgusting, it would be a better show than the netflix one. They show more gore and blood than most of the netflix fights, but the way they're staged and fought just feels like MCU combat with an edgy 14 year old adding CGI blood splaces or sickening shots of injuries. There's a particular scene I remember finding unintentionally hilarious where daredevil is... garroting? it never made much sense to me, he's somehow repeatedly cutting muse, who spews just comical amounts of blood, like enough that any normal human (like muse, allegedly) would have long since passed out or died. It's gorier than the netflix show, congrats born again, but the netflix show wasn't good because characters bled- it was good because the writers knew when to make them bleed. The scene is, like the rest of the show, a shell. I don't care about the characters in the fight, because Muse A: should already be dead and B: wasn't an interesting character, and Matt appears to be trying to break his no-kill rule that was allegedly why he quit being daredevil in the first place. Well, good news there, because either those leaks are wrong, have since changed, or disney's being really deceptive in the marketing. Cap- the true cap- didn't factor into any of the teams in the leaks I saw back then, with most leakers speculating he'd be playing hydra cap. We can now confidently say that Steve is back. I absolutely do on both a thematic and aesthetic level. Aside from looking dumb, it goes against his character. Walker's whole story is about breaking from the establishment and the regulations and the system that dropped him into Steve's shoes and then cast him aside when he made a hard call. The only time before thunderbolts' post-credits that we see him in a beret is when he's being dishonorably discharged and rejecting the story the military tribunal spins. Both stories he's been in in the MCU have been about him breaking out of the official structure. He's not the cap that would be wearing something official/ceremonial like a military beret, he's arguably the one who a black helmet fits most. It does make him stand out from Alexi/Sam/Steve, but at the same time Alexi and Sam don't typically wear Cap's style of helmet in the comics. Alexi (Who I think in the movies just shouldn't wear a helmet at all, he seems more the cheery berserker type) usually has a mohawk-like fin on his cowl, and Sam has that how-would-this-work-in-real-life wraparound hair-exposed cowl. (Which I think he should have stuck with after TFATWS, if nothing else the show did give him a pretty clean costume and the white cowl with the wings gives him sort of a bald eagle look that obviously fits a captain america well.) I'll give you that, it wouldn't have made as much sense thematically at the start of the movie. Edited December 23, 2025 by Mandalorianknight Quote
Sinistereo Posted December 23, 2025 Posted December 23, 2025 15 hours ago, calebcold3 said: Here's my guesses for the April/June Sets: April: 76345 - Bust (similar to The Iron Man Mark IV/Iron Spider ones we got this year) 76347 - Epic Battle 76348 - Epic Battle June: 76346 - Some Gimmick set (either a buildable character, a smart brick set, etc) 76349 - Brand New Day set (Punisher Van?) 76350 - Brand New Day set (with Hulk) I feel and hope that the 3000+ piece set is a D2C Batcave (comic based) I could see the theoretical Punisher van set being the same as the theoretical Hulk set. Lego would totally make the van the primary build, give us Hulk, Punisher, and Spider-Man as figures and ask us to pay $50ish for it lmao But I wouldn't be too annoyed so long as the van is beefy looking. Assuming that is the direction lego chooses to go in set-wise for this movie lol Quote
Darth Phallus Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 On 12/18/2025 at 10:15 PM, Mandalorianknight said: There's no doubt in my mind BND will get 1-3 direct tie-ins, but I'm sure at the very least we'll see something like: Hide contents "Tank Chase" ($37.99): That big tank thing with Spider-Man, Punisher, and 1-2 antagonists (Scorpion? Boomerang?) I would love that but unfortunately Lego avoids military vehicle when it can... Quote
BrickBob Studpants Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 1 hour ago, Darth Phallus said: I would love that but unfortunately Lego avoids military vehicle when it can... Just add laser cannons, slap a certain character’s logo on there, and we’re good to go Wouldn’t be the first time. Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 2 hours ago, Darth Phallus said: I would love that but unfortunately Lego avoids military vehicle when it can... They always scoot a bit closer to that line in the superhero themes, and I guess I should be clear that I don't mean a treaded tank with a turret. At least in the set photos, it's a large wheeled vehicle with no turret and a prominent cowcatcher, which I'm sure is some sort of modified military vehicle, but not one I've ever heard of, and some preliminary image searching isn't bringing me any real-world military vehicles that look like the base of this. (It also seems like it'll be driven by Spoiler the inner demons gang - Mr. Negative's organization rather than a military or government organization, so it wouldn't have military minifigures either. 1 hour ago, BrickBob Studpants said: Just add laser cannons, slap a certain character’s logo on there, and we’re good to go Wouldn’t be the first time. In this case, you'd only need to add the laser cannons (if that)- there's already logos on the tank. I got Peter's Apartment and the iron man/hammer drone pack for christmas- Peter's Apartment may be my favorite set of the year- it's exactly what the marvel theme needs. It looks fine on it's own, but when you attach the balcony they included to the door and put it on top of the bodega and next to the bugle, it really completes the image of a city to display your characters in. Figures are solid as well. MJ is great, Hobgoblin is excellent- I despise the rubber capes and will be swapping it out for a cloth one as soon as I can get ahold of that part, but the MK hood in orange more than makes up for it-, and Anti-Venom is well-designed. This is my first one, but as I'm sure I'll get another (in a modular oscorp? One that also contains Kaine, Daredevil, Moon Knight, and Luna Snow?), I've set aside one of my spider-gwens to use the head to make the anti-venom spider-man suit. The Hammer Drone set is fine- I didn't request or purchase it, so I won't speak to the price, but both iron suits included are excellent. I didn't have the MK4 yet, and was happy to place him in my hall of armor. Always good to get more War Machines as well, and this one has gunmetal hands, which are still a rarity to me. The Hammer Drones are of course not the strongest or most accurate builds, but I'm partial to sand blue, sand green, and the 1x2 ingot piece, and this set happens to include 20 of that piece in those two colors. Quote
calebcold3 Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 So, IF the 3000+ piece set (76354) is Marvel, what do we think it could be? I feel like it would be too early to get a Modular in April, so I feel like there could be many options for the potential of this set. Quote
brickbride Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 (edited) On 12/26/2025 at 5:56 PM, Darth Phallus said: I would love that but unfortunately Lego avoids military vehicle when it can... Have you seen their latest "Dreamzzz goes to war" wave of sets? Including an actual tank! Though they euphemistically re-named it a "Tiger Shark Vehicle" (translated) for the German-speaking market (the English name is "Tiger Shark Tank"). Edited December 28, 2025 by brickbride Quote
Scarilian Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 11 hours ago, calebcold3 said: So, IF the 3000+ piece set (76354) is Marvel, what do we think it could be? I think the most logical would be one of these: Captain America & Thor Collector's Edition - Enables you to build statues of both Captain America & Thor at a similar scale to 76344: Iron Man. Iron Man was 1297 pieces, so two of a similar scale would be 2594 with the additional 400ish pieces being used for Captain America's Shield and Thor's Hammer. Avengers: Compound - A modular based on Avengers: Endgame with the primary focus being a way to include a lot of the Endgame characters in a single set, re-using practically all the recent Endgame figures. The Hulkbuster - Either the MK1 or MK2 version, but more akin to a statue with a heavy focus on its detailing as opposed to playability. A direct counter to the complaints against the previours Hulkbuster and it'd scale similarly with the Iron Man statue but not be designed to fit it inside. Though I'd personally hope that it's the Iron Man Malibu Mansion for display/figures OR Doc Ock's Hideout from Spider-man 2 for it's design. Quote
Darth Phallus Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 Rumor has it that it's another helicarrier Quote
psqidexslizer Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 3 hours ago, Darth Phallus said: Rumor has it that it's another helicarrier Interesting. So, it’d be roughly the same size as the last one given the piece count. Quote
Scarilian Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 4 hours ago, Darth Phallus said: Rumor has it that it's another helicarrier Not heard that passed around anywhere, but if it is, I'm down for it. Last version was in 2015 and it was something I'd previously speculated on. The previous model had a piece count of 2996, so 3057 is not much of an increase... but it could definitely be refined a lot with pieces that have released in recent years. Hopefully if it is we get printed runways this time and not stickers. Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted December 28, 2025 Posted December 28, 2025 11 hours ago, Scarilian said: I think the most logical would be one of these: Captain America & Thor Collector's Edition - Enables you to build statues of both Captain America & Thor at a similar scale to 76344: Iron Man. Iron Man was 1297 pieces, so two of a similar scale would be 2594 with the additional 400ish pieces being used for Captain America's Shield and Thor's Hammer. Avengers: Compound - A modular based on Avengers: Endgame with the primary focus being a way to include a lot of the Endgame characters in a single set, re-using practically all the recent Endgame figures. The Hulkbuster - Either the MK1 or MK2 version, but more akin to a statue with a heavy focus on its detailing as opposed to playability. A direct counter to the complaints against the previours Hulkbuster and it'd scale similarly with the Iron Man statue but not be designed to fit it inside. Though I'd personally hope that it's the Iron Man Malibu Mansion for display/figures OR Doc Ock's Hideout from Spider-man 2 for it's design. Apparently there's helicarrier rumors (Though I haven't yet seen anyone who's heard this besides @Darth Phallus, it does sound somewhat reaonsable?), but your Cap/Thor and Hulkbuster concepts are both good. I'd add two more: 1. The Hulk - A hulk scaled to that iron man statue could easily be around that piece count, and he seems like such a clear slam-dunk for the statue line. It used to be that he, spidey, and wolverine were the big three, and it's a little odd that through the construction figure and statue sublines, the only buildable hulk we've had since his 2012 bionicle is the brickheadz. 2. Sentinel/Master Mold - This one isn't as likely given how hesitant lego is with any x-men stuff besides wolverine, but "big sentinel" has been a pretty common request for awhile. 21 hours ago, brickbride said: Have you seen their latest "Dreamzzz goes to war" wave of sets? Including an actual tank! Though they euphemistically re-named it a "Tiger Shark Vehicle" (translated) for the German-speaking market (the English name is "Tiger Shark Tank"). To be fair, nobody looking at the tiger shark tank could mistake it even at a glance for real-world military equipment any more than your average Chima or Ninjago vehicle. Stuff like Ultra Agents has skirted a lot closer to that line, and of course Lego Indiana Jones actively broke it with a literal luftwaffe plane a few years ago. Though I get why given their nonmilitary policies they wanted to make clear to the German market even by name only that the dreamzz set was not, in fact, the Tiger l. Quote
doclord Posted December 28, 2025 Posted December 28, 2025 (edited) There is no Marvel Modular this year, per tandnbricks. Sadly, I think the X-Mansion may have been the last one for a long time, as it ties into the current biggest MCU projects, and the other potential sets are either too boring (Avengers Compound), too mature (anything related to Defenders) or are not relevant enough outside of comics (Oscorp, Avengers Mansion). The "Spiderman City" sets will probably be the closest thing we get for several years, as it has big comics buildings like Oscorp and the Bugle. Good for DC, but it still stings. Edited December 28, 2025 by doclord Quote
BrickBob Studpants Posted December 28, 2025 Posted December 28, 2025 59 minutes ago, doclord said: Good for DC, but it still stings. I think a non-modular Marvel D2C set is way more likely than a DC set I didn‘t really believe the Helicarrier rumour that surfaced yesterday, but it sounds a lot more plausible now! Quote
Mandalorianknight Posted December 28, 2025 Posted December 28, 2025 2 hours ago, doclord said: There is no Marvel Modular this year, per tandnbricks. Sadly, I think the X-Mansion may have been the last one for a long time, as it ties into the current biggest MCU projects, and the other potential sets are either too boring (Avengers Compound), too mature (anything related to Defenders) or are not relevant enough outside of comics (Oscorp, Avengers Mansion). The "Spiderman City" sets will probably be the closest thing we get for several years, as it has big comics buildings like Oscorp and the Bugle. Good for DC, but it still stings. OSCORP NOOOOO! My Kaine, my Daredevil, my Moon Knight, my Luna Snow, the tiny bit of hope whisked away... In all seriousness I would assume it just means instead of the modular it's just a helicarrier or one of @Scarilian's guesses. I don't think DC is getting a modular- honestly their D2C for the year is probably just a batmobile. I do think Oscorp is still fairly likely to show up at some point, given it's not really any less relevant than the bugle and is if anything a more dynamic building. The Compound feels like the clear move for 2027 though, as they can tie it into Doomsday/secret wars unless they're given concept art of something that would work from Avengers 5 or 6 itself. Quote
Scarilian Posted December 29, 2025 Posted December 29, 2025 3 hours ago, doclord said: There is no Marvel Modular this year, per tandnbricks. Leaning towards the statue option then as I imagine Lego would expect Iron Man statue to sell but be a bit unsure of Captain America and Thor selling individually. Pairing them together also works thematically given Captain America holding Mjolnir for example. I've not seen the apparent Helicarrier rumors, but that's definitely overdue a remake as part of the lead into the 20th anniversary of the MCU. 3 hours ago, doclord said: Sadly, I think the X-Mansion may have been the last one for a long time, as it ties into the current biggest MCU projects, and the other potential sets are... The only reason we might not see a Marvel Modular for a while is that they'll probably be focusing on the upcomming Avengers movies and the 20th anniversary. When they do happen, my expectations would be: The Citadel at the End of Time/Castle Doom (If featured in Doomsday/Secret Wars) Oscorp (Comic Inspired) Avengers Compound Iron Man Malibu Mansion (2028 for 20th, 15th and 10th anniversary of key aspects of MCU's Iron Man history) Baxter Building (Comic Inspired) Unless we start getting Legacy Modulars in which case Doc Ock's Hideout would be a dream. Quote
brickbride Posted December 29, 2025 Posted December 29, 2025 (edited) On 12/23/2025 at 10:06 AM, Swordy said: Nonetheless, however, would TLG really produce a set based off that tragic of a death? Hard to say. Their track record's kind of wonky there, though IMO they seem to skew towards the darker end in recent years. Over at HP, the set 76413 from 2023 depicts a scene where a student dies, but the LEGO set omits that particular student. Meanwhile the Malfoy Manor set from 2025 includes Dobby (who is mortally wounded in the scene depicted) and the Hagrid's Motorbike set also from 2025 included Hedwig the owl (who dies in that scene - she's technically just a pet but her death is played like a person's). Edited December 29, 2025 by brickbride Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.