Frank Stella

We are coming down to the last hours, I think I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on Tony. While also being the main lynch (And we cannot risk a non-lynch again), he has not added anything into the conversations despite posting more than most people (And more then me I'm sure). Hopefully this will be the first scum lynch. Vote: Tony Smith

I have to say that whole "too eager" thing is a bit ridiculous; and comes off as really scummy. Regardless of who is eager to find scum (since Anne is not the only one eager to find scum, I and many others are too), there is no reason to criticize someone for wanting to find scum. Only a scummy person like yourself, Eva, would not want to find scum. --- Anyways, back on topic, I'm not sure who I'm going to place my vote on yet, though I know it'll be between John or Tony. I do belive at least one of them is scum, but I'm not confident enough to side one way or the other yet for a few reasons. Seeing Tony's comments in one section does point out his lack of adding his own input to the situations and how little he's actually done/said in relation to how much he's said--problem I'm having voting for him is brought up by Anne, where it seems like a scum team would be able to help him out and help him form a defense. John is in a similar situation with me, where I could see scum trying to help him out, but after his almost "blunder" on the day one votes, perhaps they are just accepting that he's been outed? That vote switch of his still brings many questions, especially since it didn't accomplish anything other then tie votes again (Saving Eva from the tie-vote, until I voted for her--if John turns up scum, then I would be inclined to say Eva is scum as well). There's still time, so I'm going to consider my vote still.

In regards to my vote aiding the three way tie; that was not part of my consideration for the vote. I wasn't voting just to get a lynch, I was voting for the person who I thought was the most likely of the group to be scum (Going off what we knew from day one, and what I thought of Eva at that point). I'm not sure what some of the other people were doing; as I know some people's votes didn't aid the lynch prospects either. I personally would rather have a no lynch then aid in a lynch of a person I didn't think was scum; especially when our group as a whole is so minimal.

Well that sucks that we lost Sol, but then again I don't think any of us didn't expect to loose at least one townie over the night. I feel he was killed because of being "middle of the pack" as others have also said; he didn't stand out much, so the scum must have went with a "safe" kill. Either way, we are now down to 12 and I think we need a scum lynch today; none of this tie stuff, we don't have time for that. Certainly. Looking at the votes from last night now, and knowing that Sol was killed, it does seem interesting that he was killed if you look at it as in relation to his vote. Yesterday's many lynches each had three votes against them from multiple people (I being one of those peoples), while Tony, who Sol voted for only had two votes. Could Sol's death be an effort to set Tony up? Why about Jo Baer who also voted Tony? I feel like it's possible the scum would do such a thing, but perhaps it is more likely that they decided not to kill one of the multiple peoples who voted for the top three, so as to not incriminate one of the top lynches as a more likely scum.

Oh yes, how could I mix up "flip floppy" with "flip sweaty"; an equally inapproprate reason for your vote. And sure I'll feel free to accuse you of that--does anyone besides yourself even know what flip-sweaty means? I don't. Main point being, it seems like just a reason you threw out to give backing to your backless vote. --- Anyways, I'm more confident in voting for Eva, who has yet not given a reason for her vote other than "just because". So I'm fine with voting now; <b>Vote: Eva Hesse</b> Oops. Fixing that mess up from above: Vote: Eva Hesse

I'm looking at them, or more accurately they are standing out more to me, because they (Those who voted almost immediatly once voting opened) seemed eager to cast a lynch when the day is still young--hence their reasons for voting already lack input from others. Basically they are ready to vote based on sketchy reasons. And of course I'm going to vote, and I have heard enough today to make my future vote more solid then it would be had I jumped on something earlier. Anywho, the people that stand out most to me thus far are Robert Mangold and Eva Hesse. Robert jumped on my alert when he attacked Brice, the person he voted for, because Brice replied soon after the vote against him so he could defend himself. Robert called Brice flip-floppy for this since he jumped in to defend himself, adding that his vote against Brice in the first place was not too firm, but that Brice defending himself confirmed his vote--this is what stood out, since it shows Robert's first reason for voting for Brice (Saying the former was trying to push the town towards a dead-end picture/art discussion) was not strong whatsoever; and then caused him to make up a seemingly stronger reason (Of "Flip Floppy") for his vote in the first place. Eva stands out too. Aside from her accent, which is just annoying, though itself has no basis for a vote against her, she stands out to me since she cast a vote early (Second actually) against John with her reasoning being because we have to start somewhere; she has yet to give any reason whatsoever why she voted for John, other than "just because", yet she is able to say that she will keep her vote on John even though she has no reason to vote for him, strange. Have you yet come up with a reason you are voting John, Eva?

I hope more information comes up soon, since like others have said, it is day one and we don't have anything solid to go on. I personally don't see any blatant scum yet, and I'm right now only looking at those people who have voted immediately. I know I'll be waiting to vote until later when we hear a bit more, even if we don't hear much more today.

Well if you don't know Frank Stella, you should first learn that I'm a minimalist printmaker. My shirt (Or what I assume is a blocky depiction of my shirt), is based on the color scheme of one of my famous prints, more specifically a large circle, with rotating colored bands inside; it has a formal name but I like to call it "Rainbow Explosion".

No! Not Craig! He was always so unique and different, he had no trouble standing out in a crowd--why would someone what to kill him? I know I didn't have anything against him, but it seems some person here does.

Frank Stella, clearly male. Ready to solve this minimal mystery; and did I hear cupcakes?