Tariq j
-
Posts
4,271 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Tariq j
-
Amanda was seen in town about 5 hours ago, so she should've been able to visit the Jury. I feel like Amandas been too much of a distraction. A lot of this day has been focused on calling Amanda to say something when attention could have been focused on other players.
-
If there's a time to vote, I'd say it's now. Voting now could be the difference between a win or a loss for the town.
-
Those numbers sound right, and a quick check on the Jury's copy of Mafiascum states normally two Mafia teams wouldn't be allied with each other and would have to eliminate each other (as well as the town to win). But that means we (the town) have to also eliminate all other factions, so if we assume the numbers are correct we're looking for 3 scum. The problem with having TWO mafia parties is that even if we say, manage to lynch the last moletti, we're only making the Bellagio's job easier, so it's vital we don't repeat what happened yesterday. That's why I'm kind of on the fence about Amanda, quiet doesn't mean scum, so she could be a very inactive townie or a hiding scum. But she hasn't come on to defend herself and her short burst essays whenever she was called out is a tell tale sign to me. Vote: Amanda Callahan (Khscarymovie4)
-
Thanks for clarifying your thoughts , Although I found Amanda more scummy, I can kind of see the logic in wanting to lynch someone who we get the most out of rather than someone who doesn't barely talks at all. I see what you're saying but I think there must be at least one Bellagio, on the Tony bandwagon too.
-
A kill every other night would make sense, and we know there's another killer out there too be it Vig/Moletti, so they too could have that rule. I wouldn't say everyone was committed to the Dez vote, in Tina's case she simply turned up to the Jury and jumped on the nearest (and easiest) bandwagon she saw, which was Dez. Whether she would have come back and turned it around? Probably not.
-
That's what I think, makings huge post after you've been called out is a big Ping to me that she is scum.
-
At the moment are votes are awfully spread out, and we can't afford a 3rd day without a lynch, I feel like with Amanda, she's done the clever thing of saying enough stuff to look active (more so than Tina), but not enough to conritbute anything worthwhile. It should also be noted Amanda only came out with her lengthy post about Alan AFTER someone called her out on it, not of her own accord. To me making a huge analysis post after you've been called out on it is a big scum tell, so Vote: Amanda (Khscarymovie4)
-
To play the devils advocate here, there are two scum teams. So even if Stephanie had been targeted by one scum team, she could still be part of the other, Just something to consider. I agree, and I feel like we need to hear some more from Anthony as well.
-
I see what you're saying but I think Gary is saying that since there were no kills on Night 1, it's safe to assume Stephanie was targeted that night.
-
To be this honest this revelation does make Stephanie seem Town BUT this is assuming two things: 1.) She was targeted by the either members of the Mafia. This is night one remember, nobody knows who's who, So Stephanie could easily be scum who was targeted by the Vig Or a the rival Mafia gang. 2.) Like Tony said, (and this depends on the host's wording) did the Doctor actually protect Stephanie at all? Sometimes if the night result says "your action was a success" in the case of actions like blocking and protecting, that's doesn't mean to say that person was targeted and you saved them, it could just mean your action went through, but didn't actually have effect, if that makes sense.
-
General Discussion and Announcements
Tariq j replied to Dragonator's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I think it's always great to have new roles and mechanics. Maybe if the Senpai dies, the win condition of the Yandere/Lovesick could change. Bob ran a very similar variant of the game just over a year ago (Secret Enemies), only instead of missions, it was Town and Mafia policies being passed through the government, for the most part it worked very well. I also like the idea of an "every man for himself" type game, a couple of years ago in the UK there was a kids TV show called Trapped, where a group of 6 or 7 kids would have to do challenges and on each challenge a "sabotager" would be chosen to try and stop the team from winning, at the end of each task everyone would have to try and guess who the sabotager was, if they were successful, the sabotager would lose and be out of the game and if people couldn't guess who it was the sabotager would win and move onto the next round. Putting it into role play, what is everyone was Town at first and at the start of each day, a "sabotager/scum/traitor" is chosen, and they have to try and say, enact a Mafia policy, (similar to what we did in secret enemies), everyone has to then vote on who they think the traitor was and if they're right the traitor dies and is out of the game but if they don't get it right the traitor moves on to the next round. -
My desicion was based of what his predecessor (steamedemon) said, now I totally get he came in halfway through the day and had a ton of votes on him, but he didn't make that much of an effort to defend himself, so my vote stayed on. I don't really see how, there were no kills on night 1, were in a small game, so logically it would make sense that either a blocker/protector was the result of no kills. Hang on, on both days I was the one who said that we should have a lynch, everyone else was saying "no, its better if we don't have a lynch so everyone is alive", simply because we found someone else scummy you didn't doesn't mean we were trying to divide the town.
-
[Ep. XVII] [Rebels] [Week 8] A Light In The Dark
Tariq j replied to Cody Startale's topic in Nar Eurbrikka Archive
Great work here , I love the shots and editing on this, especially with the glow around the flame piece. I also like the little skeleton you've made. -
That's possible, and it might even explain as to why there were no kills on the first day. One of the killers was blocked/target was protected and the other Mafia party can only kill on even nights.
-
Well a Vig is town aligned so it's unlikely they'll be teamed up. But you're right in saying about the win condition. If the moletti family is another mafia group then I imagine the win condition would be to kill all the other groups. A vengeful means if they get lynched they can choose a person to kill, since no one was lynched last night the kills jphere cant have been a vengeful but that doesn't rule one out of being in the game.
-
I'm thinking at least one of the other two families would. If both families had a kill, plus if you consider the lynch, that could potentially take out a quarter of the players each night.
-
Now this is interesting, two families we have to deal with.
-
What pings me about this isn't actually who you're trying to get the attract the attention too but who you're trying to deflect it from. I made a ton of mistakes in my first jury, we all have. But I feel like you're deliberately trying to take away the attention from them.
-
Fair enough. The reason why I called you out was because at the time of posting what you said, you hadn't specified who you personally wanted to vote for, but had asked a ton of members who they were going to vote for.
-
I actually noticed this earlier on in the day, but it was late and never got a chance to comment on it, you called out a ton of people for not voting but didn't place a vote yourself. It was like you were waiting for a good vote which you could then bandwagon on.
-
I'm voting Jimmy Hessler (Steamdemon) there's a lot of talk but no substance. And then some random, Jun on the bandwagon vote. Vote: Jimmy Hessler (Steamdemon)
-
Not really sure what's wrong with that. A recruit is a perfectly common scum action which has been used in lots of games. You're correct in saying recruits are generally used later in the game, but there's always a possibility the scum may have used it. I didn't, you misunderstood me, what I meant was compare to past games (where we've usually had 16-19 players), if there is a blocker/protector then they have a higher chance of getting lucky because we have fewer players in this game (12). All im doing is trying to suggest reasons why there was no kill last night.
-
On which part? I meant to make them as separate points. It's possible the reason there was no kill was due to the scum trying to recruit which has been done a lot in the past. On the other hand though a blocker/protector would have a good chance of stopping a kill as there are less players in the game than usual.
-
There could even be a recruit at play. I mean in a game this small, a block/protector is more likely to get lucky with 12 players rather than say 17.
-
Interesting, this is kind of why we should have had a day one lynch.