Dillpickle Catterweed
-
Posts
33 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Dillpickle Catterweed
-
What cruel winds do blow on Seks Ewe Alley, that such the fate of three shouldst be as it were. A loss of innocence in threes doth sadden all beneath the eaves. Yea, tis strange as such that claim to know the methods of our foes. How wouldst one know the Odor Eaters' armament. Be they armed with toasters, wand, or frog, I know not. Yet some pertain to ascertain the toaster was not them. I believe tis folly to assume. Beyond which, I struggle to determine a right course of action that certainty would provide. Were Regelious killed by SK or by Odor Eater, and Flabflom killed by the opposite, I fail to see the gain of knowing. Either killer must be dealt with. Were one of them to have been tracked, by hidden spy under light of moon, then they wouldst claim vig regardless. Until such revelation doth appear, or a new one present itself, mine eyes will cast their stony glare upon Krup and Wang agin. Perhaps Wang would be so kind as to clarify if his wand is now spent. Can thou cast the Provocarus Curse again, or are thee now as good as vanilla?
-
It doth register that perhaps mine explanation did confuse. I do believeth that it is possible to observe both possible sides of the coin. Yea, though the verity of the matter of good and evil within Wong's heart will only be revealed at a future time, I was recognizing the possibility of the gladiator action as being used from both perspectives. I concede the possibility. However, the rest of my discourse didst aim to clarify why, despite that, I still believeth Wong to be scum. For example, why, if Wong was indeed town, did he not choose to target the player he had previously voted for, which was Krup? Why didst he choose Snarky? Ultimately, I previously believed Wong to be the most scummy other than Krup, thou can peruse my previous posts if thou wishest to verify, and his use of his action didst not change mine mind. Indeed, I believe the role can be town aligned, yet it can certainly also be scum aligned. Personally, I find Snarky to be a rumptious ill-witted coddlebog who doth constern and confuse. Yet Wong has struck me as more sinister and deceitful.
-
Thou mightest use thine gladiatorial curse if thou believed that thou were likely to be lynched regardless of thy affiliation. Thou waited till very late, and thou used thy action to save thyself rather than another thou believed to be OotP. That wouldst have been the honorable usage, although in fairness, thy usage was understandable from a town perspective as well. What drivel doth roll forth from thine warty tongue! Thou claimeth to believe Wong used his action as an OotP to save Drum, who you are now more suspicious of? If that is the case, then thou shouldst only think so if Wong is an Odor Eater. To the latter comment, Wong cannot cast his curse upon two others, but must target himself. He wast already spotlighted by votes and his own failings to fully read the rules. He was trying to narrow the opposition to one candidate rather than a slew of them (Drum included amongst them). Whilst I do believe in Wong's claim, I cannot ignore the possibilities of both his scumminess and his towniness. His actions have not changed how I felt about him prior to them. They are consistent with a scum at risk of death, just as they are consistent with a OotP at risk of death. And so, to the tottering pottle-deep skainsmate, I shall Vote: Wong Wang
-
Folderol. Thou said thou was not serious in thy defenses, yet I detected no lack of seriousness in a number of thy previous posts. If thou couldst show me how thou was not serious, or how thy statement that thou was serious I have misinterpreted, I would vote for Wong Wang. I am not bandwaggoning. I am voting for who I believe to be the most unmuzzled hasty-witted lout amongst us. I have indeed, and would gladly see Wong go as well.
-
My vote hath come upon an unintended crossroads. Whereby the fates of others and potentiality for malodorous attack among them hath superseded that of Bartholomew. As such: Unvote: Bartholomew Bearbutt. However, it hath been noted duly that Bartholomew has yet to comment upon the accusations of my earlier vote for him. To Krup or Wang. To Wang or Krup. That is the question. Whether by deceit intentional or slight of mind, Krup's behavior hath raised suspicion such that I would not look unwillingly upon his passing should his fate be sealed. With Wang the case is equal in my mind. Wang's accusations have ebbed with the tides, flown along the breeze of ill temper rather, it woudl seem, than to be directed be the very force of Wang's own will. It hath struck me thus: that Wang has followed those that placed their accusations strongest at the time. Yet Krup's attempts at absolution hath struck akimbo, his case akilter. Behold... Oh, how I wish this were true. A longing deep within me would wish that it were simple. Verily I say that I wouldst rather cast my lot agin Wong Wang, yet this brief retort folds beneath the weight of evidence upon thee. Where, o fluff, is thy gentle softness that I shouldst grant thine author reprieve? I see no fluff here, nor can it be found. And so thou artless beff-witted minnor, I will Vote: Durmudgelous Krup If thou art indeed a member of the OotP, thy hath done us all a great disservice.
-
The vain rump-fed pignut, which is Bartholomew Bearbutt hath case aspersions upon the no less ruttish pock-marked pumpion known as Wong Wang. Verily I say, I cannot claim to know one from t'other. Yet my mind hath put it upon me that Wang and Bearbutt suffer from the same affliction of unwillingness to contribute to the democracy of death with certitude of voting. As such, can it be that both are foul Odor Eaters? It would seem a muse to consider, yet not beyond the realms of thought amidst conspiracy. And as for Snarky Snickerpuss, thy casual disregard for life hath left me aghast. 't would seem they capacity for compassion hath left. While I do not disagree that Flimflam's foible of forbidden editing should not be disregarded, as an exclusive basis for lynching it would seem more than a mite excessive. To Helena's prior inquiry regarding mine opinion on those chatterboxes as being more or less likely an Odor Eater, thy comment came before there was proper discussion of a serious bent. Merely idle chatter, as such as had occurred in the merry gaiety of the morn do not strike me as any more or less informative in regard to the past fictions from which you base your claim. Hence, yes, I disagree that those who speak more are less likely to be Odor Eaters. Perhaps those at the heart of accusation in these most recent hours, but not at the point of thy conjecture. Nevertheless, at this point, I will continue to monitor the situation, while I do case a vote of fate agin the lumpish Bearbutt. Vote: Bartholomew Bearbutt. Tis an insult of temporary accusation shouldst thou respond with aplomb.
-
A merry 'noon thou mammering idle headed clotpoles. Tis away. To be it is that isn't when it was until yet again. Yet, I cannot fathom Helena Hippopaw pretending to give us gain with such ungainly discourse. To mine soul, mine mind, mine heart, hers is surely useless in it's aid. She subtly plants in the minds of those weaker to ignore those who've been most vocal, as "they are usually not Odor Eaters". I do wonder who she doth come to such conclusions at such early hour. It doth seem to me that the substance of discussion should be first upon our minds, and not the quantity or lack thereof. And of course, as I am coposing mine thoughts, along comes Langston. I do doubt the very likelihood that Odor Eaters are not among the more conversant of the day. They are sure to lurk 'neath every guise, in a bid to gain some sway.
-
Forsooth, tis I, who doth light yon window with mine countenance.