Bfahome

This is a sort of test for mods I'll make to Mata Nui if/when I get him. Mainly the arms and thighs. I'll also replace the black Metru legs on his arms with the Keet ones used as Telluris' legs.

Or a Roxtus arena. Looked like the place Mata Nui and Tuma were fighting, and is too small to be a "valley".

Set accuracy seems to be a big thing. Looks more like Gresh than Vastus.

That only works for Ackar's sword.

Remember, he was originally attacking Berix. uh

I really doubt that's actually Telluris. If it was, he wouldn't need Skopio because he could just step on the other Glatorian. >.>

2 now exists. Seems like a nice guy. Edit: Oh my god this is awesome. New skins. Allowed someone to make this: (stole mah design. >:/)

Yeah, that voice fits well. Also WOOOOOOOOOOOOO SKOPIO. But srsly, the "there must be a traitor" thing wasn't good to put in. >.>

Only took 3 years for Jaller and co. to return as sets. Two Rahaga had their previous forms released in the same year as them. Lewa, Pohatu, and Antroz were winter 2008 sets, then were parts of summer 2008 sets. Anything's possible.

I liked it too. Much more sketchy, which helped the creepy factor a lot. ffffffffffffffffffff

I figured. I didn't think Kiina would just be standing there squirming and waving her finger off to the right.

Some of the best. I also set them in high regard since they introduced knees. Also all these pics and reviews making me want Kiina even more grah.

Because we're getting a movie? Edit: I like this Clickshield idea.

And it would be so much better if we made them aware of their fakeness before they post it. Less work for mods etc. Also I thought the point of this was to make our own story, not trick people into thinking it's real…

Forgot to ask; does Kiina's voice match her personality and actions in the movie?

People need to be able to see it so they don't actually think the "sets" are real and post them on BS01 or BZP or anywhere as if they were.

There's a trident, some sort of key, and it looks like a new monster head or something.

The point is that if you're obvious about covering something up, it's not going to be an effective cover-up. The replies could've been that Vastus was a prototype name for Gresh (which is what it was, right?) instead of "OMG that's leaked!!"

Kinda makes the case for "don't talk about it whether it's real or not", eh? Because if they only kept quiet about possible leaks when they were real, it'd be as much of a confirmation as TLG chartering an airplane and dropping thousands of small pieces of paper with the names of next year's sets printed on them throughout major cities. It's like on BZP in early 2009 when someone asked about the "Glatorian Vastus" they heard about in that older book description and a bunch of people flooded the topic saying not to talk about leaked info. >.>

I'll make it grayer, if that helps. Edit: or Different ones can be used depending on the pic's background. Edit2: Here's what the darker one looks like.

Depends on who you're asking (Vince Offer might say yes [if his tongue's healed, that it]), but I think he was referring to this:

It goes in the corner. On large images it wouldn't be too in-the-way.

A .png with a pre-set opacity would work so much better. http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm164/B...e/watermark.png