krispy

I know what you mean. I've gotta go through the list myself, but I have a ton of old gray space Lego, so I'm very excited to be using it on the Y-Wing.

Glad you asked! The honest answer is that I'm not really sure: I was building of Scott's initial model file, but I can hazard a guess comparing the two. Bear in mind (pun intended ) that because this was done in LDD, a lot less options are available with respect to legal connections (which is why you can't build the BrickWright's Y-Wing in LDD). Short version: I'm guessing that's why the two deviate. One of the biggest differences (literally) is the space the pilot has. I believe Jerac commented that the way the insides were constructed didn't leave much room to work with. As Scott's initial model was pieced together without instructions, I'm guessing that they differ much on the inside, probably due to the whole legal connections thing. I believe that this model is actually a little bigger that Jerac's original. Hence there is a little more room for the pilot which does leave more room for instruments and seating. The fins have me a little frustrated too. I'd like them thinner as well, but the way the engines are connected to the main body doesn't allow for it. That is to say: my attempts at redoing them failed so I let it be. I might hazard another attempt though; or someone here might figure something out As for the engines: the rear part of Jerac's engines aren't that accurate as they should be ring-like (not unlike the Y-Wing actually). Jerac emulated that by using light grey wheels with white stickers on the side. That's why I've used pulley's: they come the closest. I'm mildly confident that with some rigid hose and some tinkering you could get that the same way as Brickwright's Y-Wing exhausts at the end. LDD won't allow that though. On the whole though, I like my models to be LDD-able. It means it's likely to hold together and it's easy for other people to build and reverse engineer them as well even if it means sacrificing detail.

I've started a new topic so that others can find it too. Happy building!

update 2013-07-30 I've finally managed to brick build it! I've included some studio shots below. Also there's a little pointer on getting the angle of the cones to work. Finally, I've also updated the model file, as I found some errors in the 1.2 version. ---------------- I've been taking a break from building, but there was one model I haven't yet posted. I was going to do a topic after I brick-build it, but seeing as that might take awhile, I've decided to post the model file anyway. Also someone has already brick built it using my model file; I'm fairly confident that this model will work in real bricks. Disclaimer Like the B-Wing, most of the modeling was done by others, mainly Jerac and Scott34567. I've merely modified the base model to take full advantage of the parts from TLG's #75003 A-Wing model. Also some optimizations were made. So, without further ado: here she is! Studio shot 1 by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr Studio shot 2 by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr Jerac/Scott A-wing - v1.2 by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr Jerac/Scott A-wing - v1.2: Lego®-Vision by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr You can find the LDD model file here: v1.4 Building tip: inserting a pneumatic T between the cones and the round brick helps the side to keep its shape. How to angle the cones by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr Happy building!

Like this, but in bricks Jerac/Scott A-wing - v1.2 by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr

That's a cool Y-Wing! I might have to add that to my todo list (after my updated A-Wing).

Awesome! Glad to see that the instructions/model help. I'll take another look at the engine mounts when I have some more time (haven't build in a while); I'll update the model accordingly.

Awesome! The whole goodbye-money thing is a mandatory part of the experience: now you know how the rebel alliance feels when they buy starfighters Anyhoo, curious to see how your build will turn out.

Thanks! Yes, the cockpit should be able to rotate; probably even easier than the original B-Wing (something to do with that big technics gear on the back of the cockpit wheel).

Okies.. so there's this then: Deathraven 1.0 by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr It looks really similar to two B-Wings slammed together (which is kind of the idea I suppose). The internal stucture has been modified quite a bit though. I hope it's sturdy enough but I wouldn't bet on it. Here's a close up of what I mean: Deathraven 1.0 - Skeleton by Krispy's brick stuff, on Flickr As you can see, the biggest change is that there are now two 10 stud long axles on each side of the cockpit mounting hole that go deep into the upper part of the wing section. There are some smaller changes to allow the internal skeleton to extend more into that same upper section. It also allows me to use 1x12 plates liberally in the skeleton so the connections are sturdy enough to hold the axles and the cockpit. That's the theory anyway. I've done away with the big technics gear in the cockpit section, so now the "bridge" between the two wings is two studs wide instead of one. That should help too. You can grab the model here! If anyone attempt to build this .. good luck, it's 1800 parts. Also, take pictures! EDIT: if anyone has any idea about the color scheme for this thing... The wiki page didn't really specify, so I just ran with the default coloring.

I think this is doable, though it will require a bit of engineering. In my version the axle with the cockpit connection does extend into the body a bit, making the connection a bit sturdier. I've got ideas going through my head on how to do this. Let me whip up LDD when I get home. I'm assuming the angle between both B-Wing bodies is 90 degrees? I need to read wikis before posting.... I still think it can be done, but the "bridge" part between the two bodies will need serious reinforcements. Luckily the lore gives a little room to work with, though I still have my doubts about it being swooshable.

Welcome Sean! I love your steampunkt TIE

At the risk of sounding repetitive: my n00b-MOCer point of view. I'm still new to the MOC community, so I can't comment on "how it used to be". For me personally, there are just two major factors limiting my MOC output. Time and money. The other possible reasons mentioned in this thread, I don't identify with (though they could of course matter to others). (Warning: rant-like content below! You can stop reading if you're only interested in the summary.) [rant] You spend ages getting the shapes right and perfecting the greebling. Then you start to sourcing all the bricks you need, which in my experience is as costly as it is time consuming even with great aides like Bricklink. And finally, as I've recently found out with my Assault Gunboat, when you actually build it, all kinds of construction "issues" come to light (like the whole thing collapsing in on itself ). The money thing is a bit self-imposed: I suppose some people don't mind if the creation is purely virtual, even with non-existent brick-color parts, but I actually do like to build everything I design and that will cost me moneyz. I am not bothered by TLG releasing so many sets all the time. I know most MOC version are better (for my purposes) anyway. Case in point: my next build will be an A-Wing (to complement my B-Wing) which will be build in part with bricks from TLG's new A-Wing. I currently just lack the funds to order all the additional parts I need. Seriously, I need a new camera first so I can show off the MOCs better . I'm also not bothered by criticism as long as it is constructive. Call me naive, but I'm "showing off" my MOC's primarily to get feedback and make them better. That's why I share my digital files. Usually the response I see isn't exactly overwhelming, but you often just need that one nudge in the right direction (big shout out to user Cornwaille here). Of course praise is nice, even cooler if people build your design, but the best is if they improve upon it, because ultimately it's about what sits on my starfighter shelve here at home (me sharing isn't as altruistic as it seems ). [/rant] Edit: upon reading the thread again, I realized that there's something to say about the supply of models in the SW universe drying up. The Extended Universe offers a lot, but whether it's canon is debatable as I've recently found with my Missile Boat MOC. PS. Walter: I absolutely LOVE your work on the UCS TIE series

Cheers guys! Oh, sounds good! Take pictures!

*picks up jaw* That's certainly big. I love it!

No problemo; let's see if the attachment function works. EDIT: on second thought, it might not be the pulley. It could be something with the 1x10 plates as it detects the intersection with a 1x8 plate just fine.

One I found while working on an A-Wing: bounding box of part #3736 isn't right?

Okies.. so a quick write up of what I've done to get rid of the rubber bands. In all honesty: it never occurred to me they might dry out; I just didn't like the way they looked on the model. The modification is basically adapting the scissor mechanism from the excellent Mike Psiaki X-Wing for the standard 9493 X-Wing set without having to order too many parts. The LDD model file can be found HERE. This is what it looks like in real bricks: When you are going to build it, I recommend building the major components as illustrated below (the model file is already done like this). Assemble them in this order: Top wing part (the big part top right) Both lower wings Attach lower wings to top wing part Attach the cockpit part to the wing assembly Add bottom and top parts. ??? Profit! If you have an existing 9492 set that you intend to modify, note that the rear of the cockpit section is slightly modified to accommodate the 1x2 Technics brick needed for the wing assembly (shown below). Another thing to watch for is that I've replaced the stickered round tiles with a more complex assembly as you can see from this close up of the side. Note that the little 1x1 tiles do not show up in the LDD model file as LDD does not allow this kind of connection. The result is less sturdy than the original set, but at least now the wings close properly. Also, it is still quite swooshable. Good luck to anyone doing this mod; if you have questions, feel free to ask!

I have. I've used Mike Psiaki's X-Wing design as a base to redo the rear section. The wings now open en close using a scissor like action, which works much better imho. I'll see if I can make some pictures or draw up an LDD file this weekend

This: the #6801 Moon Buggy! The first set I got (probably in 1986), which is funny as it was introduced in 1981; the same year I was born in. I have individual bricks that are older (my dad had those, so that makes them early '60s), but no complete sets with instructions.

Damn, those are some big trees! I'm not much of an ewok expert though... Keep up the good work.

Thanks for the kind words guys. Much appreciated Not right now. If you have a suggestion, I'm all ears. As for something completely different: feedback from a user on Cuusoo triggered me to look at my design again. I quickly saw that the original version may be a bit too narrow on the front. The rear of the hull is 12 studs wide, but the front tapers only to 10 (hence the use of those wedge blocks there). I now redesigned it to taper to 12 studs. I've drawn up a comparison below. Which version looks best to you guys?

Cheers guys! Glad you like. I've also taken the photographic feedback to heart and replaced most shots. What do you think?

Seems that I need to pay more attention. Is it a chain? *google doet*

Thorough indeed! Thanks. I just got the 75010 myself, but mainly for the new B-Wing pilot minifig to go with my big minifig-scale B-Wing. Building the little B-Wing, though, turned out to be more fun that I expected.