lotryay

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/306621 Hope you like it!

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/320116 Hope you like it!

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/317563 Actually rocks back and forth- hope you like it!

More pictures on MOC Pages: http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/306860 The pistons actually move along with the wheels. Hope you like.

Does anyone have any idea or viable information on how long the LOTR theme is going to last? Hopefully it will long surpass the release dates of the two new hobbit movies and be just like Star Wars.

This has probably been discussed in length already, but does anyone have and idea how long the Superhero theme is going to last? Hopefully it will be just like Star Wars.

What? Is that it? Just four dollars for a second-hand set that was originally priced at 65 dollars and has been stripped of figs? Am I right in what I believe?

But, once again, may I ask, how much would I get for 6868 Hulk's helicarrier Breakout without the figs?

Could anyone tell me how likely they think it is that the Hulk will be reprinted in the future with classic purple pants?

O.k, it seems that most people are strictly against buying anything significantly large purely for minifigs. But, may I ask, and this isn't a rhetorical question, what is one to do when he wants first-hand figs that are only included in large sets and are doubted to be released again? I payed 90 dollars for the quinjet aeriel battle for Iron man, and the quinjet alone I would only give a 7.4/10 in value for money, and I paid 65 dollars for the Incredible Hulk alone, and I'm thinking of regaining my value for money just by either selling the parts second hand in box, or using the spare parts for system mocing. What does everyone elese think of this as a long-term strategy, and how much will I get for the parts in 6868 Hulk's helicarrier breakout?

So who else buys whole sets for figs? What do you think about this issue and do you think Lego should obtain an action figure license so they can market figs alone? What do you do to reduce the amount of money you lose? Personally, I've only recently had the need to buy whole sets for figs, what with the new superheroes theme, and I'm not sure whether to sell the parts, or see how I am as a system MoCer, or what. I think it would be great if LEGO could obtain an action figure license, the only downfall would be it might put a considerable dent in their profit, as minifigs, and us fools who are willing to buy whole 20-100 dollar sets for them, are a huge part of LEGO's business. Discuss. EDIT:O.k, it seems that most people are strictly against buying anything significantly large purely for minifigs. But, may I ask, and this isn't a rhetorical question, what is one to do when he wants first-hand figs that are only included in large sets and are doubted to be released again? I payed 90 dollars for the quinjet aeriel battle for Iron man, and the quinjet alone I would only give a 7.4/10 in value for money, and I paid 65 dollars for the Incredible Hulk alone, and I'm thinking of regaining my value for money just by either selling the parts second hand in box, or using the spare parts for system mocing. What does everyone elese think of this as a long-term strategy, and how much will I get for the parts in 6868 Hulk's helicarrier breakout?

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/306620 Made it ages ago.

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/316424 Hope you like it. :)

I have lots of ideas, but I really want to see Robin in his classic suit.

I would like to ask several questions about the Lego superhero sets: 1. Why was Captain America's head printed without wings? 2. Why was the Wolverine fig designed without a mask? Do you believe it is purely to appeal to those who prefer the cinematic wolverine to that in the comics, or do you think they saw such a mask as difficult to design without looking slightly ridiculous? if it is the former, why would they do that at the expense of all those who truly want a legit wolverine minifig. 3. Why is the upcoming spider-man minifig printed with big eyes. Sure, it's accurate to the cartoon it's trying to portray, but it's not really what ages groups over 13 who like Spider-man would want, and those below the age group of 13 are indifferent. Why would it be necessary to make such an accurate depiction of the cartoon at the expense of many fans, and, possibly, much money? 4. Do you think they're likely to remake Robin in his classic suit as opposed to what they've designed him with now? And, secondly, where does that black and red color scheme come from? 5. Do you think it's likely they'll redesign the batman minifIg with different suits? 6. Why was Deadpool designed with a brown sword-holder instead of a black one? 7. This isn't really a question related to the superhero sets, but the previous question sparks a point. Often Lego will do things that appeal more to younger generations, which is fair, because that's what will bring in the money, and that's the kind of company they are. But then they do things like design deadpool with a brown sword-holder, and make spider-man have big eyes, and design wolverine without a mask. Lego tries to get an image of caring for all their customers, but when they do things like design spider-man with monstrous eyes and not even give wolverine a mask, it makes me wonder if that image is one true to their nature and why they do things like that. Does anyone else know why they do things like that? Thanks.