LRDark

Yep, TLG and those who are against the MOC being produced are definitely overly sensitive prudes who were raised with puritanical leanings. Perhaps it has to do with what we view LEGO as, and less about how we view moral issues in our personal lives. I, for one, am by no means any of what you describe, and I still support TLG's decision.

Well,Yatkuu, it was a valiant effort for an undoubtedly impressive MOC; you did everything you could, and I'm sure many of would agree that you should feel quite proud of yourself. There are a plethora of suggestions on CUUSOO that won't even come close to what you've achieved. For that, I can only say congratulations- your MOC and what you've put into getting as far as you did were both outstanding! I do agree, however, with TLG, Shadows, and the others, that this was a project which just never in the cards. As fun as Shaun of the Dead is as a film (I'm a huge fan), the violence and language are far beyond anything that TLG has tackled before. While other licenses have had adult-oriented language and humour, it was few and far between. I can remember the horrific effects from Indiana Jones, such as the Nazi mechanic vs. Plane, Arnold Toht vs. God, and Mola Ram vs. Sternum, but their violence was centered on good vs. evil, and it showed what happened to those that lived villainous lives. The same is with Star Wars- Anakin despite his gristly burn, has a full arc between the six movies. With Shaun of the Dead, the only actual characters are simply trying to survive. As fun as that may be for them, it gives no real conflict, as the only "enemy" in the film is a mindless mass that is also trying to survive. There is no "good vs. evil" in this particular film; there is only "protagonists who use a lot of profanity vs. senseless murder." It doesn't teach much, if any, value to the audience. There is no "absolute power corrupts absolutely," "with great power comes great responsibility," or "friendship is magic" type of message. While the scene chosen doesn't necessarily have any negative connotations to it (other than being a bar with a shotgun surrounded by living corpses where three main characters die), TLG may very well not wish to connect themselves with such a work. Sure, they've produced guns, taverns and zombies, but please consider that all of these together might've been enough to push that proverbial envelope out of reach, especially considering that colourful list provided by Sharky. Sure, some parents might be alright with those words around their children, but I think we're all aware that the majority aren't. I for one don't feel that TLG is lying about a single thing regarding this project being denied. Personally, I would've been rather appalled, and I would've questioned the morality level of TLG had this product been green-lit. When I think of LEGO, I think of adventure, harmony, and wholesome fun, not "I got wood."

Mmm, sounds yummy! Actually, very well done, ED-209. They all look terrific, but I think the foot soldier is my favourite!

It apparently matters a whole lot to you how many figures I have. Should we always request your approval whenever we decide to purchase another piece for our collection? You assume that’s all every army builder does with their figures? I enjoy doing much more with my (admittedly small) armies, such as equipping them, unequipping them, forming ranks and battalions, and giving each figure I own a purpose for their king. At least we're not bored enough to rant, complain, and resort to name calling. You're also assuming that our army building takes up 100% of our time. Dictionary definition: Play n. Exercise or activity for amusement or recreation. I believe army building is just that. I enjoy making armies, and that’s exactly what Lego allows me to do. Do you also assume that every single AFoL who does not make their tiny figures fight other tiny figures is using the product incorrectly? I can only imagine how offended model builders are at that statement, sir. Again, why is that not right? Why do you have a cap of what is acceptable and what is not? Did some magic Lego Genie tell you that after he's what was left for you in the box? While I don't buy anything for resale personally, I understand that it happens, and I take it into account when I go to the store to buy figures when a new series hits. It's not that difficult to understand- people do it, and if you want to get figures before them, then do so. Just because it's morally wrong to you does not mean it is for them; as it isn't illegal in the slightest, it's something you're going to have to learn to deal with. It might be "wrong" to you (for whatever magical reason), but ultimately it isn't up to you to decide how they use what's available to them. I can tell that you certainly sound sorry. I, for one, don't appreciate being called a "socially impaired adult," especially by someone who knows absolutely nothing about me. You can make a judgmental statement, certainly, but passing it off as a fact instead of an opinion is something that I see as rather immature. My troops are nothing that I resort to due to boredom, but rather it's an activity that I can fully enjoy doing when the opportunity arises, such as a new wave of sets or a new series of Collectable Minifigures. Firstly, while I'm indeed giving my explanation, it seems as though one is required in order for you to accept that we actually enjoy some small aspect of Lego. Why does it matter to you what aspect that is, when all that really matters is that we enjoy it? Sure, some are used for wonderful MOCs, and some I purchase just because I appreciate the figure, but ultimately it's not up to you what I buy or why it is that I buy it. Just because you view something as "wrong" doesn't mean it is. We enjoy it, for whatever reason, and that's all that matters. Now, on a lighter note, I personally view nothing wrong with feeling the packets. I've never been questioned about it at any toy store or even the Lego stores that I've visited. In fact, as some others have made mention of previously, some employees are even kind enough to assist in the searching. One local store near me even numbers the packs 1-16 to correlate to which minifigure is inside, but they do it discretely enough to not ruin it for those that wish to gamble. In addition, I found dozens of figures for people over the holiday season for their kids, which was a very delightful feeling. Although I certainly approve of feeling the packages, almost nothing is more disappointing than seeing a package opened. If a package of anything is opened, to me, the product is ruined. Sure, every piece might still be in the package, but I can't imagine a store knowingly keeping it on the floor for sale while remaining opened.