Mencot

What make me shudder is that, it is day 3 and almost everyone has stopped talking, just waiting on my lynch. This is something Munud pointed out also! What is up with you people, what are you going to do tomorrow... continue the wasted talk about traitors? I bet you will be surprised in someways

You will see your reasoning when Iam lynched and someone will be killed. Maybe I will.

You don´t even know what was meant with that, so why comment on it? Not much contents in your words either, Day 1 Day 2 (and what a lame one it was from you, probably busy weekend but also flying under the radar.) For day 3, all that wanna, can go back and read. So yea, low posts full of fluff ecuals loyal town

The who is going for lunch today is pretty clear but what you people should start doing is to actually start searching for the scum. The killing will not stop with my lynch because I don´t have anything to do with those, what you will figure out tomorrow and the next day if you don´t find the killers quick. There is with big likeness a scum among your early "town block". I have noknowledge of who could be scum in this game, almost everybody has been acting scummy in away or the other, so far. Stop twisting my words.

Hmm, he has 4 short comments in day 1, 4 in day 2 and 5 in day 3, not really much. But yes he isn´t exactly under suspicion Sorry, I meant to write traitor not third party but sentence is usually also true.

I have never thought the traitor to be a third party . If there is a third party, I have thought it to be a scum. But there you see it how newbie I am to the whole case, with any thing like it.

I haven´t had time to read any old games in a long time (how would I whan I don´t almost have time to read through the game i am currently playing ) It was based on what i had read sometime ago. Not this year.

My own conclusions, based on reading on on the mafiawikis and other older games. But I don´t know, those were just thoughts about the whole thing. Who has said that.... Not me. But your posts in this game, nothing to brag about. So I think you don´t have anything to talk about to anyone, Petr!

No, why would I? Do you quiet one? What I think about the traitor role is, if there is one: I think the traitor knows that he is scum but he doesn´t know who the others are and the other scum doesn´t know who the traitor is.

Hmm, very confusing.

Technically yeah... hmm nothing much, just saying. It has confused alot, so thank you

:thumbup: High five :thumbup: :thumbup: Yea, this is nothing more than a scum move. And who did bring it up again? Brand is dead, he was town but who were the others? or other two people who started the whole "traitor" nonsence. wink wink

Yea, I don't agree with you. Don't see the point why you included him and some of the others to your list. Ofcourse at this point we are pretty much clueless of where to start to search for the scum. But I don't think that comment helped much! Or do you think it did?

This is not any defending Dar here because there is much I don't agree on with him. but I don't agree and see Puddle heads point about including Dar as middle, quiet, under the radar guy. He has said pretty much of contens in two days but some nonsence also.

To me it seem Lauga is trying to put me up as a traitor in this game. But maybe I am wrong if not anyone else gets that from her posts.

If you trust this scumbag with his fake claims, you can already throw in the towel. I don´t have any nightactions, so the block has been totally useless on me. If Puddingface will claim that I did something he is as scum as his ancestor before him. If you mean that PM where I said I maybe haven´t played in any games or don´t remember any traitors in any of the games i have played before. Then yes I don´t remember any, doesn´t mean that it hadn´t been used. You said there was traitors in a submarine game where a Malcome was the investigator and he trusted the wrong people, the Godfather and the got whacked at night one. After that it was pretty much scum run through and if I remember correctly you were scum in that game so you had an better look on what happened. But that was that game and this is this game, totally different. You can´t base your accusations on that game, to claim I am a traitor in this game.

Hahaha awesome opening to this day. Ability wasted because I don't have any talents.

Unvote: Cranebeinn (chromeknight) Vote: Jarl Name-Loser (jluck) Jarl has been ecually if not more today scummy.

Sunday night, jacuzzi, singstar and drinking. On my mobile, that doesn't work well but I gonna switch my vote to Jarl. Crane can be lynched another day. But can't really explain or give much because this Sony is so messed.

Yes I did and do remember. But that was not the case with her comment, as seen later when she responded back to me. But this is okay just what I saw.

Do you actually think I would remember your name Look here what she said: Then I said this to lauga in responce: Then Crane said: And okay I replied this: I see now that my damn mobile did some typos there. But what I meant to say to Crane, was: "If I, wanna know what Lauga meant with that comment about scum and traitors. Is not a bad thing because if there are traitors in this game, I wanna help finding them." There you have it... if someone is twisting words it is you Dar! Who do you think I have PM´d for info? I haven´t done that. I have asked Crane the man, about why he would be so naive to "fish" for info about town PRs and think it wouldn´t look scummy and then mean that it is a townie move to do.

For Dag the DragonD*** or what his name is!

what are you talking about? If I wanna know why Lauga means there is traitors isn't a bad thing. Because if there are in this game, they are scum and I try to help finding them.

so you are going to continue your quest against me, are you? Oh well, if you wanna. But what is this talk about "scum or traitors"? I thought there was just loyal and scum and neutral in this game... So where have you gotten that from? From the Brand discussion yesterday or what?

Awesome figs Sandy, you do have a great collection of parts.