TeddytheSpoon

I'm sort of the same, although I'm not sure there's any that I actively dislike. I just write those off as 'not for me' - life is too short to spend time disliking stuff! That said, of the series I like, this is what's near the top: Andor Bad Batch Rebels Mando (S3 really brings down the average but I have to remember how good the first two seasons were) Clone Wars 08 Clone Wars 03 (up until S7 of the Filoni one, these two would've been swapped) Tales of the *insert faction here* (mostly decent but I REALLY liked the Dooku episodes. More TPM-era content please!) Visions Acolyte (this and Visions get extra points for being something new that took a risk, which is something I think Star Wars doesn't do anywhere near enough) Kenobi (I'm a sucker for Ewan McGregor)

Both for Depa. The new mould and her limited appearances in screen media, let alone in scenes that could be made into a set, throw her way down the list of Jedi That Could/Should Be Made IMO. As for the others... do you mean Sidious pre-disfiguring? I don't think there's any need for that at all tbh. Just swap out the head and boom, you're there. I'm also assuming you mean Senator Palpatine as he appears in TPM, in which case the argument for he and Valorum are the same: they appeared a couple times in one movie where basically nothing happened other than dialogue. I'd love a set based on the big bulbous shuttle thing or Theed, but us TPM fans are feeding off scraps as it is, so I don't think there's much chance of seeing official figures for those. I think Amedda's case for inclusion in sets is similar: he's in a lot of scenes, but with minimal dialogue and/or action. Pretty easy to fit in anything Senate-related. You can make a much better case for Boss Nass though. He can fit into pretty much any Naboo set that doesn't include Darth Maul (even an N-1, arguably). If/when LEGO does make another Naboo set, IMO it'll be a big miss if he's not in it.

Funnily enough (and presuming from the other thread that you didn't know what the planets line was), a lot of those did actually get made. I liked the Planets series. I thought they made for fun display sets on a budget. Although the big planet pieces inflated the price, some of them were actually quite interesting (and plenty have been used in unique MOCs down the years). I might have a think later of which planets I'd make.

Surely Gingerbread 212th in Geonosian camouflage. The colours match already, and it would be the next monkey paw to curl for those of us who like the 212th...

So these sets have low part counts AND side builds? Hmm. That doesn't fill me with confidence.

I have seen it discounted in a few places for Black Friday weekend (or Black Friday fortnight, as it now seems to be). £110 seems like a good deal either way!

I saw the Coruscant gunship on the EU list there too. Might finally be my time to pick it up as i assume it's retiring at EoY.

£35?! That's the bargain of the century right there!

Oh I love that the remote has little icons showing what each of the levers actuate! That's a fun touch.

All I can think of here is Always Sunny in Philadelphia. (Always Sunny in Sundari?) "Day Owls! Fighters of the Night Owls! Masters of Karate! Champions of Concord Dawn, and friendship for an ex-Sith Lord!"

I'm not sure I have any specific use for this yet, but from a technical perspective it's very cool! If you find a way to do points/switches I'll be seriously impressed

I think the thing to remember about the whole 'LEGO tech never works' is that these are based on the Super Mario system, which by all accounts seems to have been a success (notwithstanding some vocal complaints online). I can see price being the bigger issue if the sets are only going to get more expensive. Even now, I can count on one hand the number of SW sets that came out this year that I'd consider good value for money.

It is quite impressive from a technical standpoint that they've managed to cram all that tech into such a small space. I still imagine I'll skip them though. I wonder how water/dust proof they'll be...

I kinda agree with this, although I don't think it's limited to LEGO Star Wars - it's just particularly prevalent in this theme for some reason. I feel like I've seen a noticeable increase in people trying to turn LEGO into an investment in the last few years ("Top 5 most valuable minifigures you MUST OWN!" or stuff to that effect). That's mostly on other social media though; I feel like forums and, to a lesser extent, blogs are less sensationalist, and therefore it's easy to be more measured.

I agree, I feel like the drop-off has been less steep on forums than it has compared to blogs, say. And after all, many social media sites have come and gone over the years. EB is still going pretty strong, and it's great it still attracts new users! I will say from personal experience too, and it was alluded to further up: the closer your ties are to TLG, the less acceptable it generally is to discuss leaks in public forums these days. Of course that's not the only thing discussed on EB but it's a big discussion driver. Hey, now THIS is blasphemy! If there's one thing the Brits can do it's a good cup of tea