Ethan Dunn

Your posts are helping me with comprehension in general and that's fun. But I'm lost here. My announcement made you worry about Robert? I think I understand your posts but I missed where you accused him of fishing. Could you tell us again in more of a SparkNotes version of your novel? Got it.

At first this pinged me because I thought it weird that you would think I was town unless I voted for you. Arthur voted for me yesterday and I still had a town read on him. I understand how my worry about the vote in the official tally wasn't explained well. But, William Mitchell voted for me and I got really suspicious of him but that was because my game was misrepresented by his accusations. So if you feel my vote misrepresents your game I can understand this feeling cuz I had it to. It's not baseless tough. If you go through the day threads and search your name you are mentioned a lot. A lot of people have concerns about your low activity. This pinged me at first because I haven't screamed at anybody or said fuck you turd or anything like that. I tried to stop the arguments they don't help. You are grouping me with others? Maybe because you are scum and easily mistake twonies for each other but also maybe because six of us are identical. No no no. I don't want to play this way and make people feel this way it makes me sad. Unvote: Zachary Mercier There's too much else going on for the day to start focusing on Zachary on a slight suspicion and start picking his words apart. Not sure if I'm right but my gut says it's not helpful.

No. He meant the scum teamates. I got it.

You freak out at one vote? Who have I screamed at? This is a similar accusation to what William Mitchell said about me that I'm creating chaos. I tried to calm down the argument yesterday. I'm voting for you for being too quiet. People asked about your vote on Morgan because it was easy and that's all you did yesterday. Now you say you had all these other thoughts fears even and didn't shared them with us. What would be to listen to post-mortem? You haven't said much. Now you suggest it's better to be quiet than try to help. That is not a townie attitude. I will try to explain the bus driver thing better. https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Bus_Driver Somebody PM me and told. me that they are a bus driver and redirected actions targeting me to Ansel and Ansel is dead. The killer says I didn't expect to see you here. The bus driver says he trusts me because he assumes the scum tried to kill me. I am worried that anybody else could've killed me, the scum kill failed for some other reason and now a scum bus driver is trying to buddy up. Either way the scum must know this so the town should to. If the bus driver is telling the truth then the scum targeted me. Even if he is telling the truth its still possible that it was a vigilante or serial killer wanting to kill me and the scum kill fail for some other reason. How many killers would there be in a game with 16? I'm really asking cuz I don't know. Any of these things are possible. Lots of things to think about and the best way to get all options is to discuss it with everyone not just the bus driver.

Here's what I've learned. Ansel wasn't the kill target last night, I was. The target was redirected from me to Ansel. The scum know this the town should too. My concern here is that the scum have a bus driver, drove me to Ansel but it was a vig or SK that targeted me and killed Ansel instead and the real scum kill was blocked or the target protected. Now the scum bus driver trying to buddy up to me. A blocker has contacted me. If you're a town blocker and not the person who contacted me please find a way to let someone you trust no to get the information to us. I'm scared. Am I doing this right? This is exciting but also a lot. If anybody has any advice for me on handling claims public or privates I'd appreciate that. Vote: Zachary Mercier This sounds mad up. You had one post yesterday where you voted for someone who had already been voted for and now you tell us you had all these thoughts about other things that were going on. So you were here but ignored people's questions for you and also didn't share your gut wrenching feelings.

Quieter then I expected today. I'm looking forward to what @William Mitchell @Zachary Mercier & @Benjamin Samuels have to add today.

Uuuuuuuum- I think his point is about Elijah no?

I posted in the wrong day. Sorry Bob. This is the phrase that keeps pinging my blipper. It's seems to be WIFOM but why would a townie serve WIFOM to the town? Seems more like something a scum would do to be clever.

This is the phrase that keeps pinging my blipper. It's seems to be WIFOM but why would a townie serve WIFOM to the town? Seems more like something a scum would do to be cleaver.

Based on what Warrne just said I looked at the people who did vote for Reginald: At the time I voted for Reginald there were three votes for Robert as well. My vote put Reginald in the lead and there was a quick voting from the others. Ethan Dunn - me Paul LaPointe Morgan Marchand Kendall Odell Benjamin Samuels Louis Townsend Louis made the lynch official and I donn't know that scum would choose to hammer position. I look at the people including me who voted after the first three with the most scrutiny but that doesn't mean the first three can't be scum of course. Morgan says his goal was to get a lynch. He also names other suspects especially Zach and he's right because Zach didn't do shit except pop into vote for him. Flying under the radar so we can't pinge him. Paul said he was suspicious of Reginald and Robert but he was poking the pig all day maybe stocking an argument between the two of them to cause distraction. Kendall says he didn't like Reginald's vote on him. I assume he means the picking randomly part and not being OMGUS towards him. He also mentions not liking poppers. Those who pop in and pop out, Zachary and William. Benjamin has low activity but gets Reginald within one vote of a lynch. He repeats what others have said. He himself hasn't added much but seems to repeat suspicions others have had. Not sure this was helpful as nobody really sticks out as scummy but maybe they are just good at appearing to be twonie. I apologize for double posting and making walls of text. I know that annoys people but I want to make some points. If you saw my point regarding Ansel why are you not happy that he's gone? Is it wrong for me to say I am happy he is gone because he was my top suspect and now I won't waste any time chasing the wrong lead. Direct suspicion of what? Being the vigilante? Why would scum kill Ansel to implicate me? I'm not sure I follow that. Do scum often point suspicion at someone and vote for them and then kill them to prove that they are townie? Because I don't understand the benefit for the scum there. Maybe you can explain to me how that would work for them.

OK Liam you're the crew of the maseba. This pinges me. You couldn't decided yesterday if you were telling us not to vote or not to lynch and now you're trying to paint yourself as some genius for knowing it would turn out bad. Where's our evidence or should we ask Flag? One of the only things you said yesterday besides not vote not lynch was this. If you think there is something between Paul and Reginald and we now know Reginald was town what do you think of Paul? You yell at us for lynching but you were tempted to vote. You've posted a lot but haven't said much and now yelling at us is more not helpful. I think it's weird that Ansel was killed. He was pretty scummy so why would the scum take him out? Were they going for lower posters to avoid detection or hunting for a townie with a role or was that a vigilante? I think Ansel was a good vigilante target. So if the vigilante killed Ansel what happened to the scum kill? Bob said there are no conversions.

I believe the sun is beginning to rise.

Rock on Robert. Great song! Guard duty is pretty boring tonight. Nothing much going on. Nothing to do but punt rats out to the sharks. PUNT! SCREEE! CHOMP!!!

I tried to ring the bell to signal help from France allegedly. But it just went DINGE DONGE! DINGE DONGE! Weird...

oh cool! Are we supposed to just roleplay and not discuss the game? Is that the rule? Oh yes there it is. It wasn't in the rules. Sorry.

Reginald if you are town it would help to get a list of your greatest suspicions for us to analyze tomorrow. If you turn up scumit will be even more interesting.

What's a policy lynch?

This PINGES me. Scum would think of other players as ones they want to keep around not townies.

OK. The tongue moves!

Morgan says he knew it was a joke but it was still scummy of me to throw a name out. Am I supposed to have expected people to vote for Arthur because his face is squashy? Morgan is still casting suspicion without voting. Liam has an inappropriate relationship with the flag. I wouldn't reccommend anybody else touching it. Liam doesn't have much to say yet he repeats it like a guy in a mental institution. And he does go back and forth about it. Not flip-flop, back and forth. I disagree with Warren that the people who talk more are likely scum. Looking at the history books in our library the scum seem to try to say less. I'm not saying it applies in every game to every player but we shouldn't follow Warren's grandpa's advice here. I also disagree that a day one lynch benefits the scum. The other thing we can see in the history books is that voting patterns can catch scum even when they are votes from day one. Not voting benefits the scum because they have an excuse not to leave a trail of evidence. I am for a day one lynch because that is how the game is played. I believe there's enough activity today for people to make an informed decision about a lynch. Anybody not contributing to the overall discussion is either scum or lazy. Or they're busy. I'm quarantined in my quarters because of the smallpox outbreak so I've got plenty of time to join the discussion. Holding a vote on conviction is what the scum did in the history book Star Trek Mafia 2. I am not afraid of a day one lynch though and I won't keep my vote on Ansel even though he blips me the most. Unvote: Ansel Michel Vote: Reginald Aston Reginald was trying to get us not to vote and not look at voting patterns claiming they are only random. The scum team is probably not placing random votes and encouraging us not to vote only gives the scum a hiding place. His need to be assertive rather than defensive also blips me.

Yeah you have.

Oh ping! That makes mores sense. I thought you guys were saying pinge. But its ping like a radar. I get it. I'd have said blipped because radar makes blips. That's scummy it blips me. On board now. Carry on. Whats with you? You said you didn't want anybody to vote. Then you said you said you just didn't want a lynch which isn't what you said. Now you say you want to vote but Flag is stopping you. Look we all love Flag but vote if you have a suspicion. Your trying to get us not to vote and then going back and forth on what you said and now voicing a suspicion without voting and blaming it on Flag blips me.

It looks to me like he is taking the comment you said into consideration. It's that he didn't vote and you did. And that was his pinge so he told us. That's what townies are supposed to do point out what pinges them. This pinges me Robert. What was the plan? Maybe I dont understand yet but I dont come in here and post with a plan. I respond to whats going on. Planning sounds scummy. Maybe I just misunderstand you. I was leaning town on you and I dont see what Reginald and Paul are voting for you for. I'd like to hear about your comment about the plan. I dont know. I asked him the same question three times and he hasn't answered.

I looked over this marathon argument between Reginald, Paull and Robert and I think I understand what the three of them are saying. I think this may be three townies arguing over each other. Robert I think Paul was saying that you voted while accusing Morgan of not voting trying to make yourself look like not the thing you were saying Morgan was. And that was a pinge for him. I think that even in context his explanation makes sense. Hes also right that Reginald's vote for you was OMGUS cuz it was. The only pinge I get from Paul is that he thinks Morgan's response to me was also a joke. Maybe that's the hypocrite part that I don't get. Maybe he's right but he seems to be alone in his thinking and its odd because Morgan has the most votes and Paul is kind of defending him. I get the most pinges from Rginald because he says hes trying to be assertive to not appear defensive. Don't we appear defensive when we defend ourselves? What's wrong with that. He also encouraged us not to vote or even look at votes and tried to make us believe that looking at voting patterns when there was no lynch had no use. The most supsicious of the three is Reginald because of his insisting we don't vote, then placing a random vote then saying he had no choice but to voice and then calling it reasonable proof against Robert. He starts buy telling us he doesn't think there's any evidence on day one but now he thinks he has reasonable proof. I find his posts hard to follow maybe because I am apparently dumb, but he says Has more evidence come to light on Morgan? Or did he just mix up names cuz its day one? I'm kind of convincing myself on Reginald here as when you look at it altogether he's pretty scummy. And hes not very nice to people and I don't like that. I know we're not supposed to vote because of that but I find it scummy as well to just push people around instead of being reasoonable. He says he doesn't want to look defensive so hes choosing to be assertive. Why be worried about seeming defensive? Unless you have something to be defensive about? I am leaning town on Robert at the moment. He seems like a townie who is trying to read people but his eyes are stuck on the two people voting for him. I can understand his concerns about them outside of that though so maybe its not just his mindset. I think hes misunderstood Paul but may be onto something with Reginald. That took me a long time to look at everything and respond. This is hard work!!

Thank you. I had googled it and got a similar response. I think I understand now.