Zandder

The nameless killer-for-hire is an NPC as indicated in the Night Zero and day posts. I know we need to examine everything but it's ridiculous to read into this as much as you have.

Proochllooeros is referreing to the carrot, pie and wine glass that are literally under His Blobbiness. No jokes and certainly no revelations about what happened in the night. Though I do think the brandy would float up through the clairvoyant coral, seeing as alcohol is less dense than water. It would be going out on quite a long limb to hope (a) that he had received a scroll and (b) hadn't given it away already, especially since (c) only those who have received scrolls know what effect they have. Though I do agree with Tameekys that it wouldn't be surprising if one of the scrolls gave a kill action to the Traveler. I'm inclined to agree with this assessment of the situation. As for rationalizing one death rather than two: Mazziko said it. A responsible vigilante doesn't attack on Night One.

So why comment then that Luxxon seems "really upset"? Can you explain that interpretation in a world where Cadd and Luxxon aren't scumbuddies together? To me it looks like you're trying to imply something while being able to say you weren't implying anything at all. But to the rest of us it looks like you're accusing Luxxon. You can't have it both ways.

I said this to Nerrio and I"ll say it to you now: it's fine and dandy not to want a lynch*, but who do you find suspicous? I'm inclined to agree with what Araveea said: And indeed Araveea and Marwyyn have the most votes so far. Why would it be in the traitor's best interests to look scummy? Why would Luxxon be upset that you pointed out someone who might be a traitor? Do you think he and Cadd are in cahoots? "Ah yes my request for B is completely separate from my request from A even though they are in consecutive sentences with no transition." Classic. If you say "it ended up being helpful" then it means you didn't plan for it from the start. You're busking to try and make Luxxon's interpretation look stupid. Well call me stupid too because I agree with him. *and the quoted vote looks OMGUS more than anything else Considering how hard you're trying to spin things against Cadd and Luxxon, it does look like you're trying to sow seeds for future lynches. Unvote: Nerrio Vote: Marwyyn

Also, Luxxon explicitly referred to your quote opening the discussion about lynching or not lynching when he complained you didn't offer an opinion. To me it looks like you offered exactly as much as Cadd did when it comes to lynch or not to lynch: a cursory acknowledgement of the topic. How come you're most suspicious of Eeyore when the posts you seem to find most objectionable are Nancy's and Luxxon's? Three votes for Marwyyn a bandwagon makes? I suppose you're officially perturbed but you'll stay out of the fray until the chips fall and you cast your absolutely seriously not-a-wagon vote? So if someone does get lynched you can do the "aw shucks" song and dance? That's true - whether there is a pew pew is up to us and our votes. As for active participation... can I prod you into activity beyond repeating "I don't think we should lynch anyone today"? Who do you find suspicious? Would a Vote: Nerrio help at all?

We need to be active participants in this process if we are to root out the Gorgons and avenge the death of King Naryyus. We create information by participating. We can't (and it would be foolish) to wait until someone shares their night action results with us - it would give the Gorgons too much power over us. The other question is what Proochllooeros is an anagram of...

Why should someone confirm possession of a scroll in one situation but not the other? Precisely.

I don't think the Traveler would reveal themselves, no. But if the mechanic works by passing the scroll around until it reaches the Traveler, then the claim of passing the scroll is verifiable. Nothing, you're right. But it's possible that there may be multiple scrolls in play if they haven't been given to the Traveler and used already. So counter-claims may not be desperately helpful. It's unclear whether passing the scroll is a night or day action. But you know what is a day action? Passing around cookies. You got any more of those macadamia nut ones?

The rules do say that every day a random siren (or jellyfish) will receive a scroll. I can't see why they wouldn't stack up. Somehow I feel this process is mediated by a certain clairvoyant coral. The person allegedly receiving a scroll could verify that they did, in fact, receive a scroll.

pew pew! I really like the fabulous fins we have on our backs for better handling down in these depths. Except Scabowee-wah, of course, who is an invertebrate. I find they really make it feel like we are a real underwater kingdom. I did like the excel spreadsheet suggestion, though. Excel helps me organize my coral-protection duties.

What an amazing figure you've got there, Scabowee-wah! What exercises do you do to keep in shape?

It seems I am not merely "Zandder" but "Zandder". I like it. Gives me a bit of oomph.

Zandder here, ready to Zandd anything and everything that attempts to harm the corals... whatever this transitive verb means.