Jump to content

lego_guyon02

Eurobricks Archdukes
  • Posts

    8,968
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lego_guyon02

  1. There were plans to show a bunch of rats eating bits of Bellatrix after Molly had killed her Definetely not the only one. Fleur is one of my favorite characters and that dress is beautifull, I do hope they give her a new hairpiece though
  2. With or without rats?
  3. I know, they contacted me earlier today saying they were writing an article
  4. That's not how it works, if there was money to be earned there would be a lot more leakers out there And like I said before, I don't do this for attention (or in this case: money).
  5. Amazing Toro made (once again) by Lucca: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/738599246764179595/767790972183904286/Carnotaurus_Toro_2020.png
  6. We've known about that image for quite a while. It looks like that's the sourcematerial LEGO used when creating the latest Hulkbuster set because of the head but it's far from the truth. Compare the set to images of the classic Hulkbuster and you'll that that's what it's based on, the head was just executed very poorly.
  7. In terms of Hogwarts' exterior the only things left that I'd really like to see are the Owlery and wooden bridge. Besides those 2 I'd like all future Hogwarts sets to mainly focus on giving us fantastic interiors
  8. It's possible but highly unlikely. An addition to Diagon Alley is a complementary thing that can also stand on it's own, an expansion to the microscale Hogwarts D2C would definetely be a cool addition but it can't stand on it's own. A set like that would be ''unusable'' for anyone who doesn't have the other set.
  9. Kingwong on Instagram posted an image of a comicbook panel with Reyes' Ghost Rider. He often hints at figures that are about to leak so if things go the same as usual that means it won't be long untill the Ghost Rider figure leaks
  10. It's very Star Warsy with the ''old good, new bad'' stuff imo. A lot of people think they're the most unique people in the world (''unpopular opinion: the original movie is the best'') and most of them keep posting the same stuff every few days. I'm not a fan of it so I keep myself to this thread and my friends for Jurassic discussions
  11. Don't think I'd recommend going there. Reddit is about as toxic as you can possibly get and, while I don't like saying it, the people on the Jurassic forums are a bunch of morons to rival the Star Wars haters. I joined a couple of years ago but I didn't stay long
  12. As of this moment the anniversary sets are only 2 GWP or Brickheadz sets. It's possible we're getting normal sets as well but from what I know atm that's not the case. I can't stress enough that, at least right now, it's very important to keep your expectations for these anniversary things in check untill we know more about them. Snape definetely shouldn't get a new hairmold but a new set of prints would definetely be appreciated! The accessory pack is a good idea but if they really want to make this a recurring thing I'd much rather have standard battlepack-like sets. They're the same price but the accessory packs are much harder to find due to them being LEGO-exclusives and because of the build included the battlepacks would give you more bang for your buck.
  13. The delay doesn't have anything to do with spoilers, they would be released before the movie so if they contain spoilers they would be out there anyway. The reason the sets are delayed is because they partially function as marketing for the movie, kids buy the sets and then ask their parents to watch the movie the sets are based on. As far as I know there's no place to talk about the universe itself. From a quick search I did find one for the MCU but the Jurassic community on EB is really small so I'm not sure if there's even a point to making a seperate thread
  14. I knew there was a GWP coming but I didn't know what it was (turned out to be the MBoM). I learned about DA a short time before it was 'made public' but couldn't tell anything so that..... well it sucked Like I said, my source prove his worth to me quite a few times I wouldn't really consider myself a leaker though, I guess you could say I'm the voice of my source's knowledge. I don't do any of this for attention, to be honest I'm not too fond of attention seekers, I just want to keep the discussion alive and going if I can
  15. The original post came from lego_fans_news, who posted it shortly after contacting me about the latest info I posted. He probably took my info out of context, ran with it and is now getting copied by other leakers I'm not saying there definetely aren't any anniversary sets among the list I shared earlier but at this exact moment the only anniversary sets I know of are the 2 I just shared the info for.
  16. Small info drop: we're getting 3 more sets in 2021. - One of them is 40500, which is an accessory pack. - The other two are 40495 and 40496. These 2 sets are for the anniversary but we're not sure what they are exactly, should be either GWPs or BrickHeadz sets though.
  17. Unless they reuse the CMF version and change it slightly there's only really the Deathly Hallows outfit left for Sprout, I doubt we'll get that in the summer wave so fingers crossed it's included here! For Snape I'd really like to see full-black robes, never been a fan of the purple But seeing as Snape's DH robes are entirely black we're bound to get a new figure sometime in 2021
  18. That McGonagall is B E A UTIFULL!!! Turned the Transfiguration book into a must-buy!
  19. I don't think I'd recommend buying the game at all. I personally didn't pick it up because I could smell that dumpsterfire from a mile away but from what I've heard the story is just decent, the endgame content gets stale very quickly, there are a lot of bugs and a ton of post-launch content has been delayed
  20. To echo @Balrogofmorgoth: this isn't the place to talk about the franchise itself but strictly the LEGO stuff (the reason news and leaks regarding upcoming projects are discussed is because they may influence future LEGO products). To answer the question: the Jurassic ''canon'' doesn't really have an answer or explanation to this problem so everything written below is pure speculation: The JPIII variant of Pteranodon did not appear on InGen's list, just like the Spinosaurus. From their absence on the list and their agressive behavior seen in JPIII we can conclude that it's likely InGen found them too agressive to be kept with the other variant of Pteranodon, the ones we see in TLW who did appear on InGen's list. It wouldn't be the first time agressive creatures are contained in different locations than other individuals as shown by Camp Cretaceous, which explained the sudden appearance of Carnotaurus in Fallen Kingdom by saying it was quarantined because of it's agression. We can assume that this second aviary containing the TLW variants was significantly damaged by hurricane Clarissa which allowed the Pteranodons to escape or, and this is less likely, these Pteranodons were set free by workers during the evacuation. After the First Sorna Incident the TLW variants of Pteranodon most likely kept roaming the western part of Sorna untill they all died before or during the islands eventual clean-up which took place around 2004. The JPIII variant fled Sorna after they were accidentally set free during the Second Sorna Incident and were hunted down and killed by Vic Hoskins and his team shortly after. It's best to just ignore it and try to fit it into canon by yourself just like with a lot of other erros and inconsistencies, Jurassic doesn't really have a canon so they don't really care wether or not everything lines up.
  21. There are only a couple of small steps leading to the main entrance so I don't see the designers putting the entrance on the second floor. If we get the vaults but not as a part of the mine I think it'll just be a more traditional vault similar to the one included in the 2011 set.
  22. I know but Dobby was most likely included in the first CMF because they wanted to include as many big characters as possible just in case the theme would die off quickly. In the case of Griphook it wouldn't make much sense to put him in a CMF and include almost the exact same figure in a normal set a year later.
  23. Thing with Griphook is that we already got that exact version in the CMF. I guess they could reuse that figure and change the face slightly but that would be extremely lame
  24. I have to agree. With the way they've designed DA there's not really a way to properly add the tracks, ''colosseum'' and vaults without it looking weird so if we just get a facade for Gringotts with the big hall as the interior and the Ukranian Ironbelly that's already enough for me. A $250 Hogsmeade set sounds much more promising to me atm.
  25. Well kinda yes and no. This really is an exceptional situation as we rarely (if ever) have setnumbers and prices this early. But I can confirm that absolutely nothing is known about the sets other than what's already been shared so in this instance Falconfan is definetely right. That doesn't mean this guy can't be right ofc but that doesn't really mean much as the Potter sets are often quite easy to predict. Not long after I posted the list I said Gringotts could be one of the sets priced around the $100 mark and Hogsmeade for $250, Instagram ''leakers'' present suggestions and speculation like that as fact so often it's also possible that this once again happened here.
×
×
  • Create New...