Mobley Mouse

Gamer
  • Content Count

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Mobley Mouse


  1. it’s possible that the slumber party role will change as various animals leave the boat. i was reporting what i received. truthfully. 
    but equally it means i don’t have a power role, and if i go the town isn’t losing anything tonight. and when i  flip town I expect close scrutiny of those who were pushing the wagon on me.

    “but mobley! you’re giving up? that’s not very townie” some of you will say. i can see the writing on the wall, i explained myself and other animals just used it as more ammunition. there aren’t enough votes unvoted to get anyone else except the memey-goat, and i don’t know if annoying equals scum. 
    “but mobley! don’t you have any suspicions yourself?” some of you will say. not really, it’s day one, no one is standing out and the certified glitch has stretched response times to re

    reduce hasty words. so no, i have no clue.


  2. 2 hours ago, Corrina Cow said:

    what I doubt is that it has no other purpose than entertainment, since no such role would be needed in a game with so many others that could be given out.

    oh wakey-fakey-steaky-makey

    take it up with the captain. I told the truth, so that we didn’t spend time distracted over what the role does. if you don’t like that, fine. it’s not like the stupid thing is compulsive anyway.


  3. 36 minutes ago, Corrina Cow said:

    It's awfully easy to just reverse anything you say when it clearly earns negative attention, isn't it? How are we ever going to be certain what you've said or meant?

    You did say that, words have meanings. You may or may not have meant it, but you said it. Then, when the answer clearly came back "hell no!" you reversed. So yeah, intentionally or not, you did exactly what they stated and then backtracked. And now you're just trying to use confusing phrasing to explain it away. Maybe you don't mean to do that, but who knows what you mean when you can change immediately?

    And then there is this. I really doubt that with enough roles to choke an entire stable, there would be additional roles created for nothing but amusement value when the host could just do those actions on their own

    oh cow-chicka-bow-wow.

    I’m making up the dragon slumber party? maybe go back and read omwom’s first post. 

    as for knowing what i mean when i say stuff, you ask. then i answer, then you listen to the answer and stop making more of stuff than needs to be. sure, what i said might have been less than englishly good. but if anyone knows what i meant, it’s me. i didn’t change what i meant between posts and i sure as steak didn’t change it in response to replies. believe me or not, but your belief doesn’t make truth.


  4. 7 hours ago, Holbrook Horse said:

    If you meant to ask whether everyone should claim, you should have said that. Instead you used the word "surely", and it comes across as a recommendation rather than an earnest question.

    oh horsey-clang-dang-wang!

    i thought i did say that. we’d can disagree on how to english good, but if i later clarify what i meant to  say, you can’t then tell me what i meant when i said what I’d said earlier.

    4 hours ago, Hyacinth Hippo said:

    Ouch! I seem to have stubbed my toe. Please, friends, I need medical assistance! Why don't we have a doctor onboard? 

    We need to vote. I'm going to:

    Vote: Mobley Mouse

    Because I found it a bit suspect that he said we should all claim, then backtracked on it, and then tried to say that he didn't actually say we should all claim. 

    ha ha ha oh,

    oh hippy-dippy-fatty-fapper.
    are you working with the horse and the dog? trying to make an book out of a tiny bit of paper? we’ve been through this a couple of times now. if you don’t like the way i phrase things, fine, say that, but don’t invent stuff that didn’t happen. 
    - i didn’t say we should all claim, i was responding to an earlier post with a interogative, surely we will? (to which the answer clearly came back, hell no!)

    - since i didn’t do what you claim, I can’t’ve backtracked. i did clarify when some animals had trouble understanding the difference between a subjunctive and declaritive.

    - and then i didn’t try to say that i didn’t say what you claim I said, i outright did say. because poofy-puppy was suspicioning me for stupid thin reason and that needed to be called out.


  5. 7 hours ago, Shainen Sheepdog said:

    This is probably where:

    How else should this be interpreted other than that you think we should all claim?

    oh shanny-sham-poo-poo.

    if you can’t tell the difference between someone asking what will happen and someone saying what they want to happen, you’re going to have a very confusing life. 
    and the first thing is said when waking up was obvious? oh wow! call the goblins! as if everyone is barking ready to go. please. and if you could tell me what is wrong with asking what we should do rather than being silent, or loudly declaring they way things should be, i’d love to learn that too.

    so far it seems you’re just suspicioning for suspicioning sake, your points are thinner than omwoms hair.

    3 hours ago, Franczeska Fox said:

    Prettty suure we knoww nothing *hic* aboutt them but I wannaa go

    Oh franny-fine-fanny-bangy! 
    if you ask nicely, maybe i can hook you up with a ticket to sleep with the dragons


  6. 2 hours ago, Benicia Bear said:

    I think someone else said it, but even if they turn roles off, they still have to kill someone and the more they know the easier they can plan their actions. Do you and the mouse want everyone to claim?

    oh beary-weary-bubbles! i don’t know where you got the idea that i want everyone to claim, i was asking if everyone should. turns out the answer is no, and i’m ok with that. i’ve never been on a boat like this, usually I just stick to soaping up tiny dragon bodies. this is all new and scary. i have now read the big book and mostly understand what animals will be able to do.