Jump to content
Issues with Images is known, we are working on it. ×

Recommended Posts

  • 7 years later...
Posted (edited)

Yes, the old ones are actually 5.4. In fact,

  • the old one is 0.9 axle + 0.1 ring + 0.4 cylinder + 4.0 axle, total 5.4
  • the new one is 0.9 axle + 0.1 ring + 0.4 cylinder + 4.1 axle, total 5.5

The 0.1 difference is equal to the ridges in all pinholes. I think the difference has to do with the fact that if the short end (0.9 long), is inserted into an axlehole (such as an axle joiner), 0.1 length of the axlehole remains unused and it's actually not in system. If you do that with the new one, it's 0.1 too long. But if the old one is inserted into a pinhole (such as a 3L differential), then there is no 0.1 shortage, but it's still 5.4 so the long end is now too short. This might be why the new ones are longer.

Edit: by the way, there are also dark-gray old ones (I mean current dark-gray, not old dark-gray).

Edited by Erik Leppen
Posted (edited)

Thanks @Erik Leppen for the exact sizes :thumbup:. This subscribes my observations. Funny thing is that in LDD the 5.5L axle matches the old one and in Stud.io - and probably LDraw - the 5.5L axle matches the new one. So my idea to obtain 11L by inserting the ring-side of two 5.5L axles into 2L of axle holes, turned out a disappointment...

800x450.jpg

Edited by Didumos69
Posted

I just tried to build that with my dark grey 5.5L axles, and indeed, it does not fit, axles are slightly too wide...

 

Good to know.

Posted
1 hour ago, Erik Leppen said:

Yes, the old ones are actually 5.4. In fact,

  • the old one is 0.9 axle + 0.1 ring + 0.4 cylinder + 4.0 axle, total 5.4
  • the new one is 0.9 axle + 0.1 ring + 0.4 cylinder + 4.1 axle, total 5.5

The 0.1 difference is equal to the ridges in all pinholes. I think the difference has to do with the fact that if the short end (0.9 long), is inserted into an axlehole (such as an axle joiner), 0.1 length of the axlehole remains unused and it's actually not in system. If you do that with the new one, it's 0.1 too long. But if the old one is inserted into a pinhole (such as a 3L differential), then there is no 0.1 shortage, but it's still 5.4 so the long end is now too short. This might be why the new ones are longer.

Edit: by the way, there are also dark-gray old ones (I mean current dark-gray, not old dark-gray).

thanks indeed, :classic: I have noticed difference between white, and black on one side and on dark bluish gray on other side when trying to make axles for my fastrac using 4 black axles 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Didumos69 said:

in Stud.io - and probably LDraw - the 5.5L axle matches the new one

LDraw has both.

  • 32209.dat is the old type, called Technic Axle  5.5 with Stop
  • 59426.dat is the new type, called Technic Axle  5.5 with Stop Type 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Erik Leppen said:

the old one is 0.9 axle + 0.1 ring + 0.4 cylinder + 4.0 axle, total 5.4

Great observation. It's the same story like "axle with stop / stud end": they have 3, 5, and 8 lengths when inserted in a pinhole, but 2.9, 4.9 and 7.9 in case of an axle hole. And as for them, I don't like be getting +0.1 axles.

Posted

I have had trouble with 5.5 axles being slightly too long during my last MOC when adding drives up the boom, between supports causing binding. “A file works” !

Posted
5 minutes ago, Doug72 said:

I have had trouble with 5.5 axles being slightly too long during my last MOC when adding drives up the boom, between supports causing binding. “A file works” !

that means that you have to use older axles :laugh:

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, I_Igor said:

that means that you have to use older axles :laugh:

Haven't got any.
The example with yellow axle joiner is about 1mm longer overall than the oe with red axle joiner which matches the 11L axle.

41447931784_5c7e43b29e.jpg

Edited by Doug72
Corrected
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Doug72 said:

The example with yellow axle joiner is about 1m longer overall than the oe with red axle joiner which matches the 11L axle.

1m longer? Are you wearing your 5x7-frame glasses:laugh:? I suppose you mean 1mm. According to @Erik Leppen's measurements it should be twice the size of a ring (= 0.2 of a stud) longer, that should be 1.6mm.

Edited by Didumos69

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...