legolijntje Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 I was thinking; is it possible to conect 2 LA's like this: They must work. The picture is from HAN. Quote
Zerobricks Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 (edited) I managed to use 2 LA's as a single one like this: Edited October 4, 2010 by Zblj Quote
legolijntje Posted October 4, 2010 Author Posted October 4, 2010 I think u got a wrong pic :D I managed to use 2 LA's as a single one like this: No, it's not the wrong pic; it's an example whit pneumatic. Your idea is good , but can it be used on a truck or smothing else? Quote
freakwave Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 I was thinking; is it possible to conect 2 LA's like this: They must work. The picture is from HAN. Easily: NO With Efforts: YES The crux is that you have to make something that can rotate with an axle, but has to move along the axle as well when the LAs extend. The solution coming to my mind would be a construction with a worm-gear that can slide over a distance of 5L. Now as the LA move they will also pivot somewhere. At this pivot the axle driving the worm-gear needs to have a Universla Joint respectively a gear rotating on this pivot point. See the 8043 for U-joints going through pivot-points as a reference! freakWave I think u got a wrong pic :D I managed to use 2 LA's as a single one like this: Isn't the whole thing the rotating? I mean the bodies of the two LAs including the bottom rod? How is this thing doing in real life? extending both at the same time or extending the upper one first, little puzzled... so I need to try this at home... Quote
Milan Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Zblj, that is very nice idea. Do they spin when they are being operated? I guess they do. Quote
Zerobricks Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Yeah, they spin too, but thats the only way for it to work. Internally they are connected via a 2L axle. They are great fio supporting weight, like crane booms and such. On thing when extending this LA combo OVERRIDERS internal clutch, so dont put too much torque on them. Quote
backbone Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Check this: http://technicbricks.blogspot.com/2008/08/tbs-techreview-05-technic-pf-linear.html Quote
roamingstop Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Actually for low torques you could use the rotating head (of the first LA) to drive the axle thread (of the second LA), with the frame for the second held rigid using a supporting beam (as per the pneumatic cranes). However it might not work for higher torques / load. Quote
legolijntje Posted October 4, 2010 Author Posted October 4, 2010 Check this: http://technicbricks.blogspot.com/2008/08/tbs-techreview-05-technic-pf-linear.html Can you post the picture? For some reason I can't see technicbricks the last time, it doesn't work. Quote
efferman Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 (edited) maybe this is a solution for you. Edited October 4, 2010 by efferman Quote
Milan Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Can you post the picture? For some reason I can't see technicbricks the last time, it doesn't work. There are 30+ pictures, here are few most important: And a video: Quote
Blakbird Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Barman has designed a whole series of parts to do just this, and has presented them on his Brickshelf page. The image I've linked below shows and animation of his concept. Very well thought out! Quote
Burf2000 Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Barman has designed a whole series of parts to do just this, and has presented them on his Brickshelf page. The image I've linked below shows and animation of his concept. Very well thought out! Very cool Quote
freakwave Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 So I tried my sliding worm-gear suggestion and it works. I did not try it with a lot of load but the principle is ok. Was too late to take pics, sorry. I will do so may be tomorrow. A little disadvantage of replacing such a "quattro" cylinder construciton with LAs is the quite bulky construction of the mechanism.. Mounting the PF-XL directily on the LA... hm, I do not like this, puts some uneven weight onto them. fW Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 to get a nice looking system you would need to use something like blakbird posted with a driven tele axle or a micomoter but it also could be done using the m moter or xl moter but just not as good looking Quote
efferman Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 4 actuators, 5 studs wide, at the base of the actuators 6 studs wide. want anyone pics? Quote
freakwave Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 4 actuators, 5 studs wide, at the base of the actuators 6 studs wide. Great construction! Very slim and space saveing solution! like it! Quote
efferman Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 thanks, i hope it could lift a relevant weight. i have made a few pics more can you find here when the folder is public again Quote
Milan Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 Great, efferman! I wonder how much it can hold and lift with one XL. Quote
efferman Posted October 6, 2010 Posted October 6, 2010 it works too with a M, but the noise of the M is a little bit stressed. the gears are producing in the current a little bit much resistance, so i have used the XL for the vid Quote
GuiliuG Posted October 6, 2010 Posted October 6, 2010 Do you use the old or the new linear actuor? Actually great construction Quote
efferman Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 ok, i have tested it and the lifting capacity is my Kat 7to mil gl (nearly 1 Kg) before the first 12 tooth Bevel Gear cracks. My conclusion of this is, that a rock solid transmission is required to get the payload from the ground. Quote
Erik Leppen Posted October 9, 2010 Posted October 9, 2010 4 actuators, 5 studs wide, at the base of the actuators 6 studs wide. want anyone pics? This is almost exactly what I did in one of my mobile cranes (not uploaded yet), but the problem with this is that the very long gear train consumes a great part of the energy, so it's not very much stronger than using just two parallel LAs. Also it's quite hard to combine with other functionality alraedy going through the boom axle (e.g. an extension mechanism). Quote
efferman Posted October 9, 2010 Posted October 9, 2010 i agree. next i will test this combination. if you and i right, it will lift my trial truck easier Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.