Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Same thing with 42061. Maybe it just didn't sell. Not surprising, since 42097 is not a commonly seen piece of equipment and thus wouldn't sell well with people who wouldn't know what the hell it is.

42061 still baffles me though, since telehandlers are pretty common.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Maaboo35 said:

42061 still baffles me though, since telehandlers are pretty common. 

Yes this one I remember too. Also 31085 from the Creator range, lasted just half a year. So it's not uncommon and seems to follow demand.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Maaboo35 said:

Same thing with 42061. Maybe it just didn't sell. Not surprising, since 42097 is not a commonly seen piece of equipment and thus wouldn't sell well with people who wouldn't know what the hell it is.

42061 still baffles me though, since telehandlers are pretty common.

Perhaps Lego plans to make another telehandler in 2021?

Posted
43 minutes ago, Maaboo35 said:

Same thing with 42061.

Whilst a very different set, and looking back a 9 year gap too, i always compared it in my head to 8295 and as such it never gelled with me.

Ian...

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, I_Igor said:

Perhaps Lego plans to make another telehandler in 2021?

Don't give me false dreams. :cry_sad:

22 minutes ago, Fuzzock said:

Whilst a very different set, and looking back a 9 year gap too, i always compared it in my head to 8295 and as such it never gelled with me.

Ian...

8295 was actually released twelve years ago, in 2008. Why did 42061 not gel with you, though? Was it 'coz you liked 8295 so much that no other telehandler could touch it? Or did it put you off telehandlers forever? :laugh:

Edited by Maaboo35
Posted
24 minutes ago, Maaboo35 said:

8295 was actually released twelve years ago, in 2008. Why did 42061 not gel with you, though? Was it 'coz you liked 8295 so much that no other telehandler could touch it? Or did it put you off telehandlers forever? :laugh:

I was thinking of the gap between the models initially, however I think it is very much that at the time I liked the 8295 so much that the 42061 was a folly to me.

Glad to say that I grew up *cough* from that thinking... :smug:

Ian...

Posted
12 hours ago, Maaboo35 said:

Why did 42061 not gel with you, though?

I remember that 42061 didn’t gel with me because it was a ripoff. $50AUD was frankly ridiculous, that thing shouldn’t have been any more than $40.

Posted
4 hours ago, Bartybum said:

I remember that 42061 didn’t gel with me because it was a ripoff. $50AUD was frankly ridiculous, that thing shouldn’t have been any more than $40.

That is crazy, I am buying it for $10AUD second hand.

 

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...