astyanax Posted April 5, 2020 Posted April 5, 2020 (edited) Quite a few people before me have had the brilliant idea of turning Lego treads inside out to make giant wheels. But it's not trivial to connect and drive them in a strong and robust way. The vehicle can easily sag under the weight of its motors and batteries. This is exacerbated by the fast spins that you'll want to do with it! I found a very robust solution: (1) making the body as narrow as possible (just 7 studs between the wheels); (2) using small Technic turntables instead of axles to attach the wheels to the body; (3) using a reinforced liftarm construction inside the wheels. The model is VERY fast on carpet. On a slippery floor, spinning is the name of the game: Piece count: 260 Motors: 2x PF Large Free building instructions: https://rebrickable.com/mocs/MOC-38946/astyanax/fast-robust-inverted-wheel Edited April 5, 2020 by astyanax Quote
Jurss Posted April 5, 2020 Posted April 5, 2020 This is cool! Why those axles at treads are not other way around? Quote
astyanax Posted April 5, 2020 Author Posted April 5, 2020 On 4/5/2020 at 10:19 AM, Jurss said: This is cool! Why those axles at treads are not other way around? Expand Actually the stops are too wide so the axles would stick out of the wheel, causing a bumpy ride! Anyway, the treads are entirely secure in the shown configuration. Quote
Jurss Posted April 5, 2020 Posted April 5, 2020 On 4/5/2020 at 10:45 AM, astyanax said: the stops are too wide Expand I think I understood, they can't pass that thread middle part. Quote
howitzer Posted April 5, 2020 Posted April 5, 2020 What a funny contraption. Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Tank Quote
SNIPE Posted April 5, 2020 Posted April 5, 2020 I tried something like this but found that you could never have perfectly parralel holes using these inverted tracks athough you could force an axle (or liftarms like in your case) in them. This is because the tracks are not precisley 1L thick. I wonder if your model has perfectly parralel tracks or are the supports forced in a bit? Quote
astyanax Posted April 5, 2020 Author Posted April 5, 2020 (edited) On 4/5/2020 at 12:01 PM, SNIPE said: I tried something like this but found that you could never have perfectly parralel holes using these inverted tracks athough you could force an axle (or liftarms like in your case) in them. This is because the tracks are not precisley 1L thick. I wonder if your model has perfectly parralel tracks or are the supports forced in a bit? Expand I don't entirely understand what is supposed to be parallel and why. Note that each wheel is driven independently. And the liftarms inside the wheel don't have to reach exactly up to the inner diameter: the axles that you see sticking out cover the last bit. Edited April 5, 2020 by astyanax Typo Quote
astyanax Posted April 5, 2020 Author Posted April 5, 2020 On 4/5/2020 at 11:49 AM, howitzer said: What a funny contraption. Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Tank Expand "This project has become known among industrial design students as a catastrophic failure of engineering without proper consideration to design." Haha yup, this contraption is good for nothing except some mindless racing fun! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.