Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Overall I kinda like it. The fenders seem to have a thin black stripe print. They really used bevel gears for the LAs, whicht seems a little bit odd, but maybe was the only solution...

Posted
Just now, Ngoc Nguyen said:

The XL LAs are indeed put at a V shape *oh2*

 

Smart use of the fact that the extension rod can turn around in the housing 

Posted

I'm a bit surprised that this final model is approved with all those disproportions compared to the reallife. Seems Volvo cares more about technical side than exact looks, which IMHO is a good thing next to UCS line.

Posted (edited)

@Ngoc Nguyen and  @Maaboo35   

Gentleman, just one another point of view; i work on pone my project for some time because I'm not satisfied with it, but to solve my problem I need liftarm 1 x 8 so I have to make compromises. The same is with Volvo; Volvo engineers make vehicles that are optimal for customers need and with LEGO limitations it is very difficult to make make correct proportions with minimal parts count...

Edited by I_Igor
Posted

I think the designer wants to incorporate the Defender mudguards, so the cabin and the hand rails must be scaled accordingly. The hazard light is also disproportionate. If it's true to scale then it should be this instead

4524365

Posted
Just now, I_Igor said:

Volvo engineers make vehicles that are optimal for customers need and with LEGO limitations it is very difficult to make make correct proportions with minimal parts count...

They could at least get the windscreen pillars going in the right direction!

Posted (edited)

I agree that the cabin's oversized. Compared to the real model, both the cabin and tipper are a few studs too tall. I do wonder how this wasn't noticed, and if it was, why it wasn't fixed.

THAT BEING SAID, I'd say the designer did a top job with the panel work on the front. The yellow curved paneling fills its spot extremely well, and I'm thoroughly impressed at how clean and finished the model looks

Edited by Bartybum
Posted
1 minute ago, Ngoc Nguyen said:

I think the designer wants to incorporate the Defender mudguards, so the cabin and the hand rails must be scaled accordingly. The hazard light is also disproportionate. If it's true to scale then it should be this instead

4524365

I agree, but it is (probably) due to parts limitation. From time to time I have learned to be a bit reserved about criticism, because one thing is to make our MOCs and another thing is when you design something for market and have compromise between acceptable price and parts expanses. I do not want to sound political, but no one forces you to buy this set and keep it like it is; you can always improve it as you made with 42097 set (If I'm correct)

Posted
Just now, Ngoc Nguyen said:

Well, technically, the box name DOES NOT say it is the A60H.

So the real model maybe a smaller hauler.

This is not final model and design. Usually they show preliminary sets at this Toyfair

Posted
Just now, Maaboo35 said:

The side panels identify it as an A60H.

As a sticker hater I wonder why do you pay attention to stickers :wink: Stickers can change and as already mentioned it can be preliminary design

Posted
Just now, rm8 said:

This is not final model and design. Usually they show preliminary sets at this Toyfair

I don't recall ever seeing a design change for large Technic sets, except for the Le Mans racer

Posted
Just now, I_Igor said:

As a sticker hater I wonder why do you pay attention to stickers :wink: Stickers can change and as already mentioned it can be preliminary design

I wouldn't imagine this would be too far from the final design. And I use stickers. Doesn't mean I have to like them.

Posted

I think they prepare for toyfair long before start. So this can be model verison of 2 months before today, despite designers have final model.

Posted
Just now, rm8 said:

I think they prepare for toyfair long before start. So this can be model verison of 2 months before today, despite designers have final model.

That doesn't deal with the fact that we pretty much never see any changes made

But honestly, aside from the weird proportions, it's a very nice looking set. I just hope the suspension turns out nice

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, I_Igor said:

compromise between acceptable price and parts expanses

I don't get this part. If the model is scaled around the wheels, then the cabin would be smaller, which would consume less part, which should lead to less part expenses?

Edited by Ngoc Nguyen
Posted (edited)
Just now, Ngoc Nguyen said:

I don't get this part. If the model is scaled around the wheels, then the cabin would be smaller, which would consume less part, which should be more profitable?

Might make the model look smaller, possibly making it look less worth its price. I doubt it's anything that sinister though, I think the designer just got it wrong.

I'm curious as to how it steers. Can anyone confirm whether we're looking at LA steering or something as boring as 42030-A's solution?

Edited by Bartybum
Posted

This model is more representative of A25G, which seems to be the smallest in the Volvo hauler line.

 

83638637_2367812696653979_71312355867748

ART_A25G_2_W_13105_04_LF.jpg

But even in the smallest hauler the cabin wouldnt be that big. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...