Karie's Cosplay Mafia: Day Two

[Hinckley]

In a game this small, we may all be vanilla Townies. Except the Scum, of course.

Here are my reasons for voting for Kylo again:

1. Speaking from the Scum perspective on why Daphne was killed. Yes, not a smart move, but we've seen a slip like that before. When LEGODad killed def in the Tree Mafia, I think.

2. He said a lot without really adding anything to the conversation–a typical Scum tactic.

3. He voted for me for being aggressive when I wasn't, things like this are magnified when you're in Scum mode.

4. He, along with Raphael, who is also being super susp, are taking advantage of the penalty votes on me

Reasons against lynching Kylo:

1. I swear I've said all these things before about him, in previous games, and he's turned out to be Town. So, that's metagaming, but his Town game is typically Scummy.

[Kintobor]

Current Votes:
Tauriel (Hinckley): 3 votes (penalty!, penalty!, Sandy, Sir Stig)
Newt (KotZ): 2 votes (penalty!, penalty!)
Kylo Ren (Sandy): 4 Votes (jimmynick, KotZ, Hinckley, Trekkie99)
Black Canary (jimmynick): 2 Votes (khscarymovie4, Tariq j)
Tyrion (Trekkie99): 1 Votes (Bob)

Apologies for the errors in the vote count, I believe I have the issues fixed. 

[Khscarymovie4]

3 hours ago, Sir Stig said:

 

@Khscarymovie4: Why did you have to point out it was a joke vote on me yesterday? After Jimmynick pointed out stupid reason. I don't find much contribution in your posts, other than keeping score of who is not active, and stating obvious mafia strategies.

Can you please show me where I said you had a joke vote on you yesterday? I'm not sure I understand this. Also when have I keep score on who is a active? The only time I can think of was when I agreed with Tyrion wanting you to say something when you had been completely silent. I also don't remember stating any mafia strategies. Are you confusing me with someone else or are you just making stuff up? I find your completely random post with random voting reasons to not contribute.

[Trekkie99]

Sandy and Sir Stig voting each other day one and then Hinckley today makes me think they could be scum partners. That and the other odd bits and pieces of their activity strikes me as funny. There's not a massive push for Sandy's lynch which gives Sir Stig room to avoid his potential scum partner's lynch, and instead vote for Hinckley alongside his partner. 

Sandy and Sir Stig voting for each other day one caught my attention after the day had ended, but this morning the suspicion didn't hold weight as much as I'd originally felt. Sir Stig's vote Hinckley alongside Sandy, along with his more recent activity, reinstated my initial suspicion.

[Tariq j]

4 hours ago, Sir Stig said:

 I will change my vote again. Let's see who hammers, and who doesn't. If he turns up town, I, Sandy and the hammerer will be under scrutiny. This is a risk I am willing to take. I would vote for Korry/Khscarymovie4 if she was close, and am willing to change if enough people are on board with that gut feeling.

Another vote change? You’re posts are confusing. You’re doing a Kylo Ren. You’re saying things without saying anything at all. 

4 hours ago, Sir Stig said:

Since most does not understand my gibberish,

So you admit your posts are gibberish but are upset no one understands them? 

The votes on Kylo Ren have built up quickly. Newt Scamander’s vote seemed sheepish. And Trekkie also flipped randomly.

 

[Trekkie99]

4 minutes ago, Tariq j said:

And Trekkie also flipped randomly.

I was open to lynching the dark lord awhile ago. 

[jimmynick]

1 hour ago, Tariq j said:

Newt Scamander’s vote seemed sheepish.

Good observation. Nota bene that nobody is interested in voting for Newt. Might that be because he's playing a fairly innocuous game, so we don't have reason to vote for him, and because scum don't want to trump up charges against him? Now, I know not to trust anything anyone says, but Tauriel has a point that Sir Stig's vote is stupid. But my objection is for a different reason:

5 hours ago, Sir Stig said:

Why not Newt? I don't know. Why not?

You seem to have no reasons to choose Tauriel over Newt, or vice versa. "I don't feel like it" is a crap reason to vote for one over the other. As I pointed out to Korra, we don't look for excuses to vote for someone: we look for reasons.

1 hour ago, Trekkie99 said:

I was open to lynching the dark lord awhile ago. 

I also observe that @Trekkie99, despite endorsing my early vote, didn't follow my lead until Sandy and Hinck were both on 3 votes each. If I entertain the thought that Tauriel and Tyrion are scum together, that rules out Kylo Ren. Megabluck it.

Unvote Kylo Ren (Sandy)

Vote: Newt Scamander (KotZ)
 

[Trekkie99]

^^^Scum^^^

Me thinks.

[KotZ]

38 minutes ago, Trekkie99 said:

^^^Scum^^^

Me thinks.

Jimmynick is scum or me? 

[Trekkie99]

24 minutes ago, KotZ said:

Jimmynick is scum or me? 

Spoiler

 

[Bob]

9 minutes ago, Trekkie99 said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I think all your memes and what not are just a guise to hide the fact that you're actually scum. How much time is left in the day? Can I repeat my vote for you to try and draw attention to it? Why is everyone acting so weird this game? Is everyone scum except for me? No, Daphne wasn't scum. Is everyone scum except for me and Daphne? 

Trekkie is talking in memes. Sir Stig is speaking bonkers nonsense. Hinckley is saying that he's voting for people for dumb reasons. I don't understand Jimmynick's vote. Sandy is the wrong character from Star Wars. I guess that's not a reason to be scum.

What's going on? Someone help me.

[Trekkie99]

9 minutes ago, Bob said:

What's going on? Someone help me.

And you feigning confusion. 

There's under an hour left in the day. Put your vote somewhere that will give us a lynch people!!! Jimmynick is looking very scummy changing his vote at the last minute.

 

Something!!!!

Anyone wanna here?

[Bob]

35 minutes ago, Trekkie99 said:

Anyone wanna here?

Here what? I'm not going to just vote for someone when I don't properly understand the rationale behind it. 

[KotZ]

Y'all, we need a lynch, otherwise we're basically resetting. Today's been ugly. Hopefully we can analyze a bit better tomorrow.

Unvote: Kylo Ren (Sandy)

Vote: Tauriel (Hinckley)

Both are really scummy today, and there's way too many of us acting sheepish.

[Trekkie99]

Just now, KotZ said:

Y'all, we need a lynch, otherwise we're basically resetting. Today's been ugly. Hopefully we can analyze a bit better tomorrow.

Unvote: Kylo Ren (Sandy)

Vote: Tauriel (Hinckley)

Both are really scummy today, and there's way too many of us acting sheepish.

What even is the case against Hinckley?! He scares Sandy and Sir Stig is like "Uh, so your not sure if sandy is scum? Oh. Okay. Well, uh, you called me inexperienced so, yeah. There's that."

 

[Khscarymovie4]

45 minutes ago, Bob said:

I think all your memes and what not are just a guise to hide the fact that you're actually scum. How much time is left in the day? Can I repeat my vote for you to try and draw attention to it? Why is everyone acting so weird this game? Is everyone scum except for me? No, Daphne wasn't scum. Is everyone scum except for me and Daphne? 

Trekkie is talking in memes. Sir Stig is speaking bonkers nonsense. Hinckley is saying that he's voting for people for dumb reasons. I don't understand Jimmynick's vote. Sandy is the wrong character from Star Wars. I guess that's not a reason to be scum.

What's going on? Someone help me.

Your not the only one who is confused. So many scummy things have been said today I can't even wrap my head around it. There is still a lot of questions I had a couple of hours ago  (yesterday) that remain unanswered 

On 6/20/2019 at 1:32 PM, Khscarymovie4 said:

This comes off as very defensive about someone who you are not, do you know something about this person that we don't know? Are you a dynamic duo for evil trying to save a body for scrutiny? 

I mean I think most of us just wanted you to say anything as you were not hear at all for awhile. I thinks that's issues specific enough. Also I have to ask but what does the quote you quoted have anything to do with what you are talking about? 

I don't remember a comment saying Kylo Ren has a defeatist attitude. I remember this. 

Which I still have no idea what that means, and I think plenty of us here have asked what you were talking about but no comment on your own odd comment. How exactly is Kylo having a defeatist attitude? You seem like you have your reasons but yet seem afraid to share them. 

I don't expect the ninja to give real answers at this point but I hope maybe Tyrion of Black Canary can answer this much need questions. Tyrion why were you so defensive about my questions for the Canary? And I still have no clue what the Canary is talking about in her "complimenting the scum reason". Also no examples of Ren having a defeatist attitude. So what was her vote about? I guess she just really agreed with Tauriel. Yet she changes her vote to Newt because he is sheepish. Not arguing about the sheepish vote but you also have little reasoning's behind your votes. 

2 hours ago, Trekkie99 said:

^^^Scum^^^

Me thinks.

Specific reason? Why do I even bother asking at this point. 

1 hour ago, KotZ said:

Jimmynick is scum or me? 

Any response to your votes against you? 

1 minute ago, KotZ said:

Y'all, we need a lynch, otherwise we're basically resetting. Today's been ugly. Hopefully we can analyze a bit better tomorrow.

Unvote: Kylo Ren (Sandy)

Vote: Tauriel (Hinckley)

Both are really scummy today, and there's way too many of us acting sheepish.

Any reasons!? You are right about many of us being sheepish though. But I think you forgot to bah in your post. 

I guess we have a lynch. Yay. I find so many of you scummy today, but I think Black Canary is still the top with her no reasons vote for Ren and then switch to a person who also has no reasons. I don't even need to explain whats scummy about the ninja but if I have to it seems he is randomly spurting non sense as a way of last resort maybe? Its not like he was close to a lynch though. I will have my eye on this one tell he either he is dead or I am. Tyrion's original defense and little reason for calling people scum is also fishy. And then Newt comes in and does so more fishy voting with no reasons. From now on lets just vote randomly with no real reasons at all and maybe the scum will just reveal themselves. 

[KotZ]

3 minutes ago, Trekkie99 said:

What even is the case against Hinckley?! He scares Sandy and Sir Stig is like "Uh, so your not sure if sandy is scum? Oh. Okay. Well, uh, you called me inexperienced so, yeah. There's that."

2 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

Any reasons!? You are right about many of us being sheepish though. But I think you forgot to bah in your post. 

I guess we have a lynch. Yay. I find so many of you scummy today, but I think Black Canary is still the top with her no reasons vote for Ren and then switch to a person who also has no reasons. I don't even need to explain whats scummy about the ninja but if I have to it seems he is randomly spurting non sense as a way of last resort maybe? Its not like he was close to a lynch though. I will have my eye on this one tell he either he is dead or I am. Tyrion's original defense and little reason for calling people scum is also fishy. And then Newt comes in and does so more fishy voting with no reasons. From now on lets just vote randomly with no real reasons at all and maybe the scum will just reveal themselves. 

Unfortunately Hinckley has the most votes with the penalties, and we would not reach a concensus. With Sandy and Tauriel going at each others' throats, I think there's a chance one is scum and we can find out which one is scum tomorrow morning with the reveals. Black Canary I agree seems scummy, but I think everyone is just throwing darts and the wall to see what sticks, and there's no rhyme or reason.

 

[jimmynick]

8 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

her no reasons vote for Ren

OK, lemme break this down for you. If someone says "OMFG Daphne died, I super super hope she wasn't the cop" that's congratulating the scum on their choice of kill. That's what Kylo Ren did, and I didn't like it. The "defeatist attitude" is the tone of how Sandy said it: more or less "well shit we've lost our (possible )cop, what are we going to do now."

9 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

switch to a person who also has no reasons

There are these things called context clues, like when I contemplated possible reasons that people voted for Tauriel but not Newt:

3 hours ago, jimmynick said:

Might that be because he's playing a fairly innocuous game, so we don't have reason to vote for him, and because scum don't want to trump up charges against him?

where you can read "scum don't want to trump up charges against him" as "scum don't want to bring attention to one of their own". Not everything has to be "I think X is scum because of Y and Z." I remember when a certain Senator played a fairly stupid game and ended up being scum...

There's not much I can do when I point out reasons for my votes and all you can say is "that's not a reason, I can't read, la di da".

[Tariq j]

1 hour ago, Trekkie99 said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

So if you think Jimmynick is scum then why are you voting for Kylo Ren/Sandy instead of him? You and Raphael are talking in riddles at this stage. Newt is saying other people are sheepish... whilst being sheepish himself. He also agrees with Korra that Black Canary is scummy.... yet votes for Hinckley instead. 

There’s too much flip flopping going on in the votes. People are saying they think someone is scummy. But then do a 360 and vote for someone else for little to no reasoning. 

[Trekkie99]

Just now, Tariq j said:

So if you think Jimmynick is scum then why are you voting for Kylo Ren/Sandy instead of him?

Because Sandy is scummier and I encourage you to join me. Who would you rather lynch? Sandy or Hinckley?

9 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

Tyrion why were you so defensive about my questions for the Canary?

I'm assuming your referring  to this?

On 6/20/2019 at 7:19 AM, Trekkie99 said:

(1) I mean it is odd, but maybe it was somewhat of a joke saying the vote was self explanatory? That's how I viewed it at first anyway.

(2) While not a very detailed reason, I think it pretty much sums up Sandy's behavior.

(3) IDK 

I was defending my own actions from when I half joked that an explanation for his vote was unnecessary.

 

21 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

Specific reason? 

The sudden vote change. Jimmynick voted for Sandy first. Maybe Sandy is his scum mate and Jimmynick didn't think the bandwagon for Sandy would take off. Now Jimmynick finally got a reason to jump in the form of seeking a lynch. 

Man I'm gonna look so scummy if Hinckley flips scum. 

[Trekkie99]

Quite a few people here. Anyone wanna be productive?

[Sir Stig]

4 hours ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

Can you please show me where I said you had a joke vote on you yesterday? I'm not sure I understand this. Also when have I keep score on who is a active? The only time I can think of was when I agreed with Tyrion wanting you to say something when you had been completely silent. I also don't remember stating any mafia strategies. Are you confusing me with someone else or are you just making stuff up? I find your completely random post with random voting reasons to not contribute.

Last post before day 1 ended.

3 hours ago, jimmynick said:

Good observation. Nota bene that nobody is interested in voting for Newt. Might that be because he's playing a fairly innocuous game, so we don't have reason to vote for him, and because scum don't want to trump up charges against him? Now, I know not to trust anything anyone says, but Tauriel has a point that Sir Stig's vote is stupid. But my objection is for a different reason:

You seem to have no reasons to choose Tauriel over Newt, or vice versa. "I don't feel like it" is a crap reason to vote for one over the other. As I pointed out to Korra, we don't look for excuses to vote for someone: we look for reasons.

I also observe that @Trekkie99, despite endorsing my early vote, didn't follow my lead until Sandy and Hinck were both on 3 votes each. If I entertain the thought that Tauriel and Tyrion are scum together, that rules out Kylo Ren. Megabluck it.

Unvote Kylo Ren (Sandy)

Vote: Newt Scamander (KotZ)
 

But wait? Why? If you entertain the thought that Tauriel and Tyrion are scum together, that rules out Kylo.... and then you vote Newt/Kotz? Your reasoning lacks coherence

[Khscarymovie4]

On 6/16/2019 at 11:35 AM, Khscarymovie4 said:

Unvote: Raphael (Sir Stig)

That was a joke vote and I now have a little bit of a suspicion towards some of our cosplayers. I am worried about some of our cosplayer who fail to vote, as its not helpful to the town. I also I think Tyrion's latest post always raises some questions from me that I asked above. I will 

Vote: Tyrion Lannister (Trekkie99) 

 

9 minutes ago, Sir Stig said:

Last post before day 1 ended.

Yes I needed to remind everyone that my obvious joke vote was a joke vote. Truly a scummo could only do such a thing. Nice to see your failed to give examples of your other suspicions against me. Need I remind you? 

5 hours ago, Khscarymovie4 said:

Can you please show me where I said you had a joke vote on you yesterday? I'm not sure I understand this. Also when have I keep score on who is a active? The only time I can think of was when I agreed with Tyrion wanting you to say something when you had been completely silent. I also don't remember stating any mafia strategies. Are you confusing me with someone else or are you just making stuff up? I find your completely random post with random voting reasons to not contribute.

 

[Kintobor]

Day is now over!

With a majority vote, Hinckley is lynched.

Night begins. You have 48 hours to get your night actions in.

[Trekkie99]

23 minutes ago, Sir Stig said:

Last post before day 1 ended.

THE SCUMMO HAVE SPOKEN!!! DISCUSSION, FROM HERE ON, IS UTTERLY POINTLESS!!! 

XD

rip