-
Posts
21 -
Joined
About Robert Mangold

Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
435 profile views
-
Minimal Mafia: Day Three
Robert Mangold replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Sorry, that was the investigator cleared Eva, not the investigator cleared John. Same difference. Anne, you weren't going to win in pushing that point, so you changed your tune. I think you knew exactly what I meant, but exaggerate your confusion to help justify pointing your finger elsewhere. Revenge voting. Very townie scummy. I feel better about my vote. -
Minimal Mafia: Day Three
Robert Mangold replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Sorry, I forgot about that claim when was saying that. Nobody has been blocked can counter claim that? I think it's safe to trust your claim. -
Minimal Mafia: Day Three
Robert Mangold replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I can emoticon too. When I have time, I can. I know you're unemployed, Jo, so you can spend hours going though things, but I genuinely haven't had the time to participate. It's just what happens sometime. Don't hold your breath. It cuts off the air to the brain. It's bad for you. I appreciate your hard work in catching scum so far. Oh, wait, none of us have Glass houses, stones, etc etc Anyway, now that that piousness has been dealt with... I don't think they would. There is/was an investigator, so unless the scum got really lucky on day one, were read as godfather, then got contacted by the investigator, and knew to kill them (making that Frank)... It's just really unlikely they would risk lying when the real investigator could call their bluff. John calls Anne scum, and she immediately backs down on her very strong claims. I don't like that at all. I agree, but I have been away from things for a while. Even most of day two, I wasn't able to check in much. If I don't have a lot of opinions, then it's better for me to go along with the town pack, rather than float out some baseless theories for the sake of pretending to be active. Looking at the quotes from Donald and Anne, I'm pretty iffy about the both of them. Donald immediately tries to cast doubt on the claims, which seemed really solid from the start. Anne's worries me more though. She knew she would lose if it came down to her and John, so she did a hard 180. Too wishy washy. Dan is getting the lynch, unless a lot of you change your minds quickly. My vote won't change much. Vote: Anne Truitt -
Minimal Mafia: Day Three
Robert Mangold replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
I'm sorry I don't have much to contribute. I'll try to find some time today to read through things before the day ends. -
Minimal Mafia: Day Three
Robert Mangold replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
if John and Eva are confirmed through an investigator, I will vote with them. -
Minimal Mafia: Day Three
Robert Mangold replied to Hinckley's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
That's too bad about Tony, I was really hoping we were making some progress. Why didn't the investigator tell Eva this? -
Not trying to pick on you two days in a row, but can you make some time to explain your thinking? I know you're busy painting and all...
-
Sorry I've been away, I'm back now. You noticed I was gone, right? I don't think John would be scum. His voting was irregular, but I think if he had a scum team they would have told him to sit on his vote with Eva. Tony I feel 50/50 with. The points Anne made were fair, and he was Sol's choice. Day one, there was no real reason to vote except that we had to. Today, we have a better idea of who to vote for. Vote: Tony Smith
-
If you hadn't voted as you did, for the reason you did, it probably would have. As it is, this frustration is a little flop-sweaty (or flip-floppy-flip-sweaty as Frank Stella thinks the English language works). You haven't pushed the point since, so I'm fine with not pushing it for now. There is a chance that you are scum who got cautioned and changed tactics, but there's as at least as good a chance that it was just a joke. I've seen townies do much worse on day one. Let us call this a detante, Brice.
-
That's my thinking. Not so much as to be a frame, but that he was killed to lead us astray. Sol wasn't even part of the top three lynch candidates. His suspicion wasn't carrying much weight. Looking at the votes yesterday, I don't know who would be protected. John McCracken: 3 votes (Eva Hesse, Anne Truitt, Ellsworth Kelly) Brice Marden: 1 vote (Robert Mangold) Eva Hess: 3 votes (Dan Flavin, Tony Smith, Frank Stella) Ellsworth Kelly: 3 votes (Donald Judd, Carl Andre, John McCracken) Tony Smith: 2 votes (Sol LeWitt, Jo Baer) Robert Mangold: 1 vote (Brice Marden) Frank voted for Eva late to make a three way tie, and Carl voted for Ellsworth to tie the vote with John. Maybe Carl was saving John, or Frank was trying to muddy the waters. Let's keep our fingers crossed that someone has something to reveal after last night
-
Thanks Ellesworth. I can't make much of that so far, but it's a valuable post that we can refer to I wanted to address this post from yesterday, but we got cut off before I could. Reason one is fair enough, but reason two is totally scummy. I completely explained my reasons. As much as the host loves people to search images to suss out scum (whether there, or more often than not, not), that isn't a helpful way to play. Brice claimed that he was joking about his original post analyzing the day one photos, but it it just wasn't obvious at any point, until I voted for him and he made a big deal of it. He swung it back to the idea that I was 'poorly justified' in voting for him. No, that was suss. He doth protest too much...
-
It's not surprising we lost one of ours today, but I think we're in a better position than if we'd lynched Town yesterday. Now to look at Sol's history, to see if there's a reason he was chosen. He wasn't on my radar yesterday.
-
I don't feel confident enough to drop the hammer on any if you. I don't think John is scum, so it would be you or Eva. I'd rather have a no-lynch for day one though.
- 100 replies
-
What the hell is flip-sweaty? First time you can't read, it's an honest mistake. Second time, you're just being a dummy. Anyway, I gave two reasons for my day one vote, so it seems you don't know what backless means either.
- 100 replies
-
Can you find where I called him flip-floppy? I can't. I did say he looked flop-sweaty, which has a totally different meaning, as in, being sweaty because you're nervously failing. But if you want to accuse me because you can't read, feel free. Can we have a vote tally? I'm on a phone, and can't keep track easily. Is there a tie? Lynch is guaranteed unless there is a tie. Maybe for day one, we should try for a tie. It seems safer.
- 100 replies