Vezon

I always thought Nuparu headlined the Inika. I might think that because he was on the cover of Power Play, which was the first book with the Toa Inika (not counting the very end of Dark Destiny).

Although if we got Mata Nui then we wouldn't have the yellow Rahkshi.

It would need to be a black set so it couldn't be Pridak. Maybe Nuhvok? It does annoy me there's two 09 characters when this line is supposed to be about old character and not ones that were just introduced. However, most of my annoyance at the Skrall set is because this is the third Skrall-like small set we've gotten in a year. Weren't Atakus and Fero enough? At the very least, though, this has a slightly different build and a black Kopaka blade.

All of these guys are cool, but Tahu is just plain incredible. Plain and simple. And remember this isn't really a small version of him, since the Av-Matoran body is barely shorter than the Toa Mata. This set's actually an upgrade over the Mata and Nuva versions due to the improved hip and shoulder articulation, as well as the moving neck. I don't think I've ever been this excited about a Bionicle set before.

I'm the kind of person that can only buy something if it's unopened. I've looked for misb Tahu's multiple times, and they're really expensive.

It looks like instead of being comlpetely orange like Ackar's, Tahu's is gonna start red on the bottom and gradually turn orange. I'm really exicted with these sets, especially since this is probably gonna be the closest I ever get to owning Tahu Mata (Despite being one of the smaller sets, the build is about the same height as the Mata's).

Either that or the fact that the Legends leaked less than a week after I first spotted the Glatorian.

Agreed. Together those shots take up, what, 10 seconds of a 75 minute long movie?

I've been thinking for a while that the titan looks a great deal like Mata Nui's original body. I decided to try something. I removed the weapons and the shoulder blades, as well as giving it a different head. I have an image of it here.

The only part that seemed to imply the sets was this: It is possible he's implieing that the sets aren't real. However, he could be referring to something else, like a storyline explanation for why all of these characters are back, and just be trying to lead us in the wrong direction. :P

Note that this is the kind of set that looks a lot better in person than in photos. Despite all of the great pics I've seen, it just looks meh in every single one. I bought it expecting something decent but nothing more, but after building it, spending some time posing it, and seeing it in person and not in a pic or a vid, I honestly think it's the greatest Bionicle set I own (and that's a lot of sets :P).

I actually had a small theory a while back. These set listings seem to support it. Basically I believed that either the main story would go back to the MU in the next year or two or the Toa Nuva would go to the 2010/11 location. First there was the large storyline change Greg spoke of. It's the reason the ELs were revealed so early, as well as the RS's purpose. Second has to do with a question Greg was asked a few months back. We all remember back in 2008 that when Greg was asked if the Nuva would appear in the main story again, he said there were no plans at the moment. However, a few months ago, someone asked Greg if the Nuva would reappear in the comics. If a character appears in the comics than it's almost a guarantee that they're a character in the main story. Greg said he wasn't able to discuss this. I know Greg saying "I can't discuss this" doesn't automatically mean "yes." However, I don't get why he wasn't able to discuss a question that he already gave a direct answer to half a year before. The only explanation I was able to think of would be that the answer to the question changed. That's what concluded me to think that the huge change would be the Nuva returning to the main story. If the set list is true then the theory was at least partially right, with Tahu and Taka (if he counts as a Nuva) getting new sets and becoming main characters in 2010's story.

At least we'll have someone on here to chase as an angry mob. :P

Right now Taka looks like how he did in 03, except with the 08 set's weapons. He was cured of the Shadow Leech by the Klak, and the growth spurt was only in effect while he was in Karda Nui. Once he left he gradually returned to his original height.Also, I see where you're coming from about rereleasing the sets, but what's the point of rereleasing Gresh and Skrall, who were released 2 waves/1 year before?

I'm certain that's incorrect. Not once in the OGD has Greg been able to discuss the 2010 story, including the location. Let alone 2011.

I hope I'm not sounding like that, and I'm also not trying to say that if they can't discuss it that confirms the list is real. I've just been meaning to say that in my opinion if they aren't able to discuss it, then it adds a small thing to the list of reasons why it might be real.

Although Vastus did turn out to be a real name. Just not one for the winter sets.

Sorry about that. Although has any info about 2010 Castle sets been revealed so far? In addition, I'm a bit curious about what Greg said back when the Phantoka list was first revealed. What happened there might help a bit this time around.

Is it possible they're in these sets? It's a bit difficult to tell if they are or not, though, since it's a bit blurry, in addition to elves looking similar to people, especially as minifigs.

Elves as in characters or their own line? I'm asking because I've seen a group of Castle sets that might have elves in them.

Really good points from both of you guys. I honestly think if Greg can't talk about it then it's real. There's no real point in Lego being quiet about a fake list of sets.

Thanks. Still, if a list turns out to be fake, then he's allowed to confirm it being fake. Similar to that list of 2009 sets with Brutaka in it. I remember him saying it was a fraud right away.

What exactly does NDA stand for?

As awesome as images would be, right now I'd be perfectly fine with just BZP coming back up. I bring this up because I want Greg to say if the list is real or fake.

True, but it seems that all of the names have come from the same source. If some of them are right, then I think they're probably all right.In short, here's what I think of the Bionicle names on the lists: Original names: Real Tilius names: Fake Also, thanks for the link, Brickthing