Rufus

WTF????? Firstly - who's we? Who else has divine powers around here? Secondly, you and I discussed the 'invisibility' already, and I gave you my truthful answer. Thirdly, I was having a daydream that I was at home with my beautiful wife, and whilst watching television, I was idly reliving with her the long conversation I thought I'd been having with YOU and your disciples. But that can't have been happening, because I am here, with you, in this godforsaken asylum, where innocent people are dying left right and centre, and you are wasting your time watching me 'skulking around dark corners.' We all 'discussed it together', yes, but I did not want to reveal this information because it might undermine your plans. The last thing I knew, it wasn't me you were switching, so how can I be sure anything else you said has actually happened? Your view on the likely killer is based on the fact that you blocked who you suspected, and no kill has occurred. I agree with this logic, but how can I be sure who you actually blocked? Surely you can see where I'm coming from?

Once again, we start the day with no sinister killed, and closer to our own deaths. I am sorry for the death of Misty, although I did have my own suspicions of her; still, she wasn't working for us. The death of Canny Bol is a shock, and a blow. It is my understanding that he was the only one left of us insanes with the potential to take out sinister at night. Not that he was ever successful, but I was hopeful for last night. The manner of his death was different to the Walrus killings; the possibilities here are that his target defended him/herself, or that there is another killer out there. I am saddened to find that Jesus has turned against me. I would like to ask Jesus: what is your reason for suspecting me, and why did you choose to switch Timtam and me when there are much more suspicious people out there? I have done nothing but try to track down the sinister, and I have done my best to assist in the limited way that I can, including bringing you all the information I received. If you're looking for a mole in the group, you should be looking elsewhere. I might also ask if the conclusion you have drawn from your attempted swap is correct? The way you have presented it, of course Timtam will defend himself and point the finger at me, and it would be natural for me to do the same, but because I know my own innocence, and I don't want to jump to conclusions, I will continue to hunt for the sinister the only way I can. I'm sure there will be more revelations about last night, including the name of the likely killer, and I would like to hear all of this information before I voice my own suspicions and pass judgement.

Threatening us will get you Nowhere. Unvote: Misty Monroe Vote: Mr. Nowhere

Then who is? You've been acting suspiciously, and haven't said or done anything to help bring the sinister to light. And I'm in a bad mood. Vote : Misty Monroe

It looks like Dr. Bloodbrick is cracking. Maybe it's the sleep deprivation, or maybe he is already half mad as Jesus suggests. I'm really struggling to follow what's going on here. The machete killings point to there definitely being some sinister in here, but maybe there are fewer than we thought? I've been going over and over what everyone's said and it's driving me nuts. More nuts, at any rate. I'm going to have a lie down.

This is a disaster. I cannot believe we haven't managed to find a sinister yet. I was sure Ted would turn out to be sinister, or at least independent, but no he was insane. What was he playing at? And what's with that quicksilver brain? If he'd been more open with us, we could have had a powerful weapon, if he was telling the truth about his night immunity. Trust him or not, you all must agree with Jesus about one thing - we have to get a sinister tonight, though I confess I'm not really sure where to start.

He unvoted Titmam so I guess the vote for Cookie should stand. Ahem, of course I mean Timtam.

Well, Timtamtum, after our chat, I believe you may be worth a chance. Just prove us right tonight. Unvote: Timtam Tummers Vote: Ted Tompkins, who remains in my eyes the most suspicious.

This is super confusing. What you've said sounds convincing... I'm tempted to unvote you, but I'd like to know how you plan to prove yourself. Tell me privately, if you like.

Professor Diem in bed with Dr. Ballbreaker? Eeuuw. I'm not sure what to make of that. I guess it confirms Dr. B isn't the night killer, but as has been said, doesn't prove she's not sinister. I think if the photograph of Martin's killing was meant to obscure the killer, it would have been a little more obviously obscured. So the only sensible conclusion is that it's the blue arm/yellow hand guy. Unvote: Ted Tompkins Vote: Timtam Tummers I do hope we're right about this.

I'll have you know I'm a vegetarian. Mmmm, tofu! For now, I'll stand by my vote. Ted sounds like a likely independent. Better vote off an independent than risk voting off another insane.

Dangit people talking at the same time. What you say has the ring of truth, Petey. Mr. TNT has been suspiciously quiet, so until something else comes up I will join you. Vote: Ted Tompkins

A voice in my head just reminded me you can't vote for yourself, which makes Petey's 'assurance' from yesterday a bit worthless, in my opinion, assuming he had read the rules knew that. You heard it too?

Wait - before you vote yourself off, Petey, this could be very relevant. I've had a niggling doubt about Tompkins - he has a funny smell about him. Perhaps he'd like to explain himself? It may be that what you found last night is more useful than if you had found a file. Unless, of course, you are trying to mislead us.

Perhaps he should lay off the ketamine? Seriously, def, this a fantastic story: colourful, gripping, and poignant, with beautifully rendered scenes and fantastic photography. Just don't go too Twin Peaks with the ending! (Yes, I got the gum quote )

2 minutes before, to be precise, hence the four out of five trips westbound

For a swansong, Havel's is the most heartfelt I've heard, and his reasoning is, well, reasonable. I'm having a hard time believing he's sinister. Most of us have put our trust in Jesus' plan. I'm not sure how much it will tell us about who's voted, other than that there are (to my count) two people besides Havel who haven't yet voted. If Havel isn't sinister, it looks like Petey's ability is useless

I think that's a great idea. It will also bring a lot of traffic into this forum, and hopefully increase the exposure of the rest of the content. I also think it might be a good idea to have a themed month once in a while (obviously when there isn't other stuff going on) - a Creator month might be worthwhile. One thing I've learned from doing Creator reviews is that it's a theme which doesn't get much attention, but when brought to the limelight people often comment very favourably. Showcasing the theme could help

Whilst I agree that 'LEGOs' is highly distateful, I'm somewhat surprised that the company should be so worried about this. What the disclaimer is saying in effect is that LEGO bricks shouldn't be referred to simply as 'LEGO' or 'LEGOs'. Why this should hurt the brand is a mystery to me; I can't see it's any different to Tannoy or Hoover (or Kleenex or Coke), and I don't see those guys complaining. Perhaps someone in marketing knows different Now to be anal: LEGO, if used to refer to bricks, the Company, or the Group is a collective noun. As such it ought to be followed by a singular verb: 'My LEGO is dusty'; 'LEGO is trying to promote its brand image', et cetera. Though I can't say I'm always 100% accurate in following those rules myself

A possibility, but it suggests Cat had more than one grenade. It appears to be more of a self-defence role that didn't work, as Dr Blutz said in his letter. As for the vote, I'd be happy to proxy to a known insane. Proxy: Ricardo Salvatore

Oh. My. God. What a disastrous night for us. Three good men lost. I too was convinced of the King's guilt; I can only hope that we don't make the same mistake again. At least we know not to trust Petey's findings. Sorry Petey. But, Jesus is right, we still have the evidence of the blue arm, assuming the Photographer's evidence can also be trusted. I wonder if he saw anything last night? Jesus, I want to trust you, but I'm still concerned that you proxied your vote rather than voting for the King yourself, considering you were so vocal about his guilt. It was your confidence that persuaded me to vote for him. Did you want to escape the consequences of his wrongful conviction? I suspect we will learn more in due course, so I'm going to hold off voting for now.

Excellent, Blackknight112!

:laugh: Very funny! The picture could do with being a little brighter, but do post some more! Thanks for blogging mine, KimT!

You certainly gave me a fright! I like the train moderator logo. I hope you'll continue to post your wonderful articles here, otherwise I'll have to visit the Train forum more, and I don't understand much of what goes on there!

Sorry - I didn't make it public - now fixed. I did upload it to the SW Photography pool, but it needs moderator approval